Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 25
Claim 1
Independent Claim
35 words
A method of normalizing a subject's immune response which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 effective to increase the proliferation of T cells and thus normalize the subject's immune response.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
35 words
A method of normalizing a subject's immune response which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 effective to increase the proliferation of T cells and thus normalize the subject's immune response.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
11 words
A method of claim 1, wherein the subject has an immunodeficiency.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method of claim 2, wherein the immunodeficiency is a congenital immunodeficiency syndrome, Hodgkin's disease, Kaposi's Syndrome, or Nezeloff Syndrome.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method of claim 2, wherein the immunodeficiency is caused by immunosuppression associated with chemotherapy, radiation therapy or bone transplantation therapy of cancer.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method of claim 2, wherein the immunodeficiency is associated with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method of claim 1, wherein the interleukin-2 is selected from the group consisting of interleukin-2s characterized by molecular weights of about 14,500±2,000, 16,000±1,000, 17,000±1,000, and 26,000±4,000 daltons as measured by gel filtration and sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method of claim 6, wherein the interleukin-2 is further characterized by a specific activity of at least about 9×10 5 U/mg in the murine interleukin-2 dependent cytotoxic T-cell line assay.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method of claim 2 which further comprises administering to the subject a lymphokine other than interleukin-2.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method of claim 8, wherein the lymphokine is administered in combination with the human interleukin-2.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
38 words
A method of treating a subject having an interleukin-2 dependent neoplasia which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 in combination with cytotoxin effective to inhibit growth of, or cause regression of, the neoplasia.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
38 words
A method of treating a subject having an interleukin-2 dependent neoplasia which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 in combination with cytotoxin effective to inhibit growth of, or cause regression of, the neoplasia.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
13 words
A method of claim 10, wherein the interleukin-2-dependent neoplasia is acute lymphocytic leukemia.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method of claim 10, wherein the interleukin-2-dependent neoplasia is a neoplasia of mature T-cells.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method of claim 10, wherein the interleukin-2 is selected from the group consisting of interleukin-2s characterized by molecular weights of about 14,500±2,000, 16,000±1,000, 17,000±1,000, and 26,000±4,000 daltons as measured by gel filtration and sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method of claim 13, wherein the interleukin-2 is further characterized by a specific activity of at least about 9× 10 5 U/mg in the murine interleukin-2 dependent cytotoxic T-cell line assay.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
32 words
A method of treating a subject having an overreactive immunity which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 effective to decrease the reactivity of the subject's immune system.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
32 words
A method of treating a subject having an overreactive immunity which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 effective to decrease the reactivity of the subject's immune system.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
12 words
A method of claim 15, wherein the subject has an autoimmune disorder.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method of claim 15, wherein the interleukin-2 is selected from the group consisting of interleukin-2s characterized by molecular weights of about 14,500±2,000, 16,000±1,000, 17,000±1,000, and 26,000±4,000 daltons as measured by gel filtration and sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method of claim 17, wherein the interleukin-2 is further characterized by a specific activity of at least about 9×10 5 U/mg in the murine interleukin-2 dependent cytotoxic T-cell line assay.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
35 words
A method of selectively eliminating interleukin-2 receptor-bearing cells from a subject which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 in combination with cytotoxin effective to selectively eliminate the interleukin-2 receptor-bearing cells.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
35 words
A method of selectively eliminating interleukin-2 receptor-bearing cells from a subject which comprises administering to the subject an amount of a human interleukin-2 in combination with cytotoxin effective to selectively eliminate the interleukin-2 receptor-bearing cells.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method of claim 19, wherein the interleukin-2 is selected from the group consisting of interleukin-2s characterized by molecular weights of about 14,500±2,000, 16,000±1,000, 17,000±1,000, and 26,000±4,000 daltons as measured by gel filtration and sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method of claim 19, wherein the interleukin-2 is further characterized by a specific activity of at least about 9×10 5 U/mg in the murine interleukin-2 dependent cytotoxic T-cell line assay.