← Back to Patent Explorer
US5742507A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Driving stability control circuit with speed-dependent change of the vehicle model

Assignee: ITT Automotive Europe GmbH
•
Filing: 1995-06-07
•
Granted: 1998-04-21
•
Expires: 2015-06-07
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The present invention is a control circuit for controlling the driving stability of a motor vehicle, in which the desired value of the yaw rate is calculated by a vehicle model. To make it possible to calculate a value of the highest accuracy possible using the vehicle model circuit at both very high and very low velocities, at least two vehicle models, which are associated with suitable velocity ranges, are used within the vehicle model circuit. The changing over between the two models is performed as a function of the range of velocity being used. Advantageous variants of the inventions use the hysteresis of the two velocity threshold values, at which the changeover is performed, and avoid jumps in the output signal of the vehicle model circuit during changing over between the models.

Inventors

  • 👤 Alfred Eckert

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-27 08:51
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60K; B60K31/00; B60T; B60T8/00; B60T8/17; B60T8/1755; B60T2230/00; B60T2230/02; B60T2270/00; B60T2270/30; B60T2270/86

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim 356 words
A control system for controlling driving stability of a vehicle which has a velocity, a steering angle, a measured yaw rate, and a plurality of brakes to which respective braking pressures are applied, individually, comprising: means for receiving first signals representing the velocity, second signals representing the steering angle and third signals representing the measured yaw rate; vehicle model means responsive to the first and second signals for providing one of a first desired yaw rate and a second desired yaw rate, including: (1) first modeling means for determining the first desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a first predetermined range of values, and (2) second modeling means for determining the second desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a second predetermined range of values, said first predetermined range including velocity values lower than said second predetermined range; means coupled to the receiving means and the vehicle model means for comparing the measured yaw rate to the one of the first and second desired yaw rates provided by the vehicle model means, to calculate a difference therebetween; yawing moment control means responsive to the difference for determining a moment that is applied to the vehicle, so that the measured yaw rate is adjusted towards the desired yaw rate; and means responsive to the yawing moment control means for determining pressure adjustments that are applied to each brake, individually, to generate the moment, wherein: the vehicle model means provide the second desired yaw rate when the velocity of the vehicle increases from a first predetermined velocity to a second predetermined velocity which is higher than the first predetermined velocity, the vehicle model means continues to provide the second desired yaw rate while the velocity of the vehicle decreases from said second predetermined velocity to a third predetermined velocity, and the vehicle model means provide the first desired yaw rate when the velocity of the vehicle decreases from said third predetermined velocity to a fourth predetermined velocity, said first predetermined velocity being higher than either of said third and fourth predetermined velocities, thereby providing hysteresis in switching between the first and second desired yaw rates.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 356 words
A control system for controlling driving stability of a vehicle which has a velocity, a steering angle, a measured yaw rate, and a plurality of brakes to which respective braking pressures are applied, individually, comprising: means for receiving first signals representing the velocity, second signals representing the steering angle and third signals representing the measured yaw rate; vehicle model means responsive to the first and second signals for providing one of a first desired yaw rate and a second desired yaw rate, including: (1) first modeling means for determining the first desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a first predetermined range of values, and (2) second modeling means for determining the second desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a second predetermined range of values, said first predetermined range including velocity values lower than said second predetermined range; means coupled to the receiving means and the vehicle model means for comparing the measured yaw rate to the one of the first and second desired yaw rates provided by the vehicle model means, to calculate a difference therebetween; yawing moment control means responsive to the difference for determining a moment that is applied to the vehicle, so that the measured yaw rate is adjusted towards the desired yaw rate; and means responsive to the yawing moment control means for determining pressure adjustments that are applied to each brake, individually, to generate the moment, wherein: the vehicle model means provide the second desired yaw rate when the velocity of the vehicle increases from a first predetermined velocity to a second predetermined velocity which is higher than the first predetermined velocity, the vehicle model means continues to provide the second desired yaw rate while the velocity of the vehicle decreases from said second predetermined velocity to a third predetermined velocity, and the vehicle model means provide the first desired yaw rate when the velocity of the vehicle decreases from said third predetermined velocity to a fourth predetermined velocity, said first predetermined velocity being higher than either of said third and fourth predetermined velocities, thereby providing hysteresis in switching between the first and second desired yaw rates.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 56 words
A control system according to claim 3, wherein: the first modeling means include means for determining the first desired yaw rate based on a stationary circular travel model of the vehicle, and the second modeling means include means for determining the second desired yaw rate based on a dynamic single track travel model of the vehicle.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 82 words
A control system according to claim 1, wherein: the vehicle model means provide the first desired yaw rate when the velocity of the vehicle is less than 30 kilometers per hour (km/hr), the vehicle model means provide the second desired yaw rate when the velocity of the vehicle is greater than 50 km/hr, and the vehicle model means switch between providing the first desired rate and the second desired rate while the velocity of the vehicle is between 30 and 50 km/hr.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 53 words
A control system according to claim 1, wherein: the first modeling means generate a plurality of output values, and the second modeling means determine the second desired yaw rate based on the plurality of output values when the velocity of the vehicle passes from the first predetermined range to the second predetermined range.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 68 words
A control system according to claim 1, wherein the second modeling means generate a set of output values, further comprising: means for generating a plurality of correction factors based on the set of output values, wherein the first modeling means determine the first desired yaw rate based on the correction factors when the velocity of the vehicle passes from the second predetermined range to the first predetermined range.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 389 words
A control system for controlling driving stability of a vehicle which has a velocity, a steering angle, a measured yaw rate, and a plurality of brakes to which respective braking pressures are applied, individually, comprising: means for receiving first signals representing the velocity, second signals representing the steering angle and third signals representing the measured yaw rate; vehicle model means responsive to the first and second signals for providing one of a first desired yaw rate and a second desired yaw rate, including: (1) first modeling means for determining the first desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a first predetermined range of values, and (2) second modeling means for determining the second desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a second predetermined range of values that is different from the first predetermined range, said second modeling means generating a set of output values; means coupled to the receiving means and the vehicle model means for comparing the measured yaw rate to the one of the first and second desired yaw rates provided by the vehicle model means, to calculate a difference therebetween; yawing moment control means responsive to the difference for determining a moment that is applied to the vehicle, so that the measured yaw rate is adjusted towards the desired yaw rate; and means responsive to the yawing moment control means for determining pressure adjustments that are applied to each brake, individually, to generate the moment, means for generating a plurality of correction factors based on the set of output values, wherein the first modeling means determines the first desired yaw rate based on the correction factors when the velocity of the vehicle passes from the second predetermined range to the first predetermined range, and the first modeling means includes a first one of the correction factors as a component of the desired yaw rate, said first correction factor defined by the equation: ##EQU30## where Ψ korr first correction factor, Ψ Desired is the desired yaw rate, δ is the steering angle, ν is the velocity, l h is a distance between a rear axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle, l v is a distance between a front axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle and ν ch is given by the equation: ##EQU31##
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 389 words
A control system for controlling driving stability of a vehicle which has a velocity, a steering angle, a measured yaw rate, and a plurality of brakes to which respective braking pressures are applied, individually, comprising: means for receiving first signals representing the velocity, second signals representing the steering angle and third signals representing the measured yaw rate; vehicle model means responsive to the first and second signals for providing one of a first desired yaw rate and a second desired yaw rate, including: (1) first modeling means for determining the first desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a first predetermined range of values, and (2) second modeling means for determining the second desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a second predetermined range of values that is different from the first predetermined range, said second modeling means generating a set of output values; means coupled to the receiving means and the vehicle model means for comparing the measured yaw rate to the one of the first and second desired yaw rates provided by the vehicle model means, to calculate a difference therebetween; yawing moment control means responsive to the difference for determining a moment that is applied to the vehicle, so that the measured yaw rate is adjusted towards the desired yaw rate; and means responsive to the yawing moment control means for determining pressure adjustments that are applied to each brake, individually, to generate the moment, means for generating a plurality of correction factors based on the set of output values, wherein the first modeling means determines the first desired yaw rate based on the correction factors when the velocity of the vehicle passes from the second predetermined range to the first predetermined range, and the first modeling means includes a first one of the correction factors as a component of the desired yaw rate, said first correction factor defined by the equation: ##EQU30## where Ψ korr first correction factor, Ψ Desired is the desired yaw rate, δ is the steering angle, ν is the velocity, l h is a distance between a rear axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle, l v is a distance between a front axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle and ν ch is given by the equation: ##EQU31##
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 78 words
A control system according to claim 6, wherein the first modeling means calculates a vehicle side slip angle and includes a second one of the correction factors as a component of the vehicle side slip angle, said second correction factor defined by the equation: ##EQU32## where β korr is the second correction factor, β is the vehicle side slip angle, m is the weight of the vehicle, and c h is a rigidity factor for the rear wheel.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 34 words
A control system according to claim 7, wherein the first and second correction factors diminish over time after the velocity of the vehicle passes from the second predetermined range to the first predetermined range.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 69 words
A control system according to claim 8, wherein the correction factors decrease each time Ψ Desired and β are determined, according to the equations: ω.sub.korr (n+1)=Ψ.sub.korr (n)*λ and β.sub.korr (n+1)=β.sub.korr (n)*λ where n is an integer, and λ given by the equation: ##EQU33## where l is Euler's number, T o is a time interval between calculated values of the correction factors, and T p is a characteristic response time.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 38 words
A control system according to claim 8, wherein: the vehicle model means switch between providing the first desired rate and the second desired rate at a changeover velocity which is determined based on a size of the vehicle.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 385 words
Control circuit for controlling the driving stability of a vehicle, in which the variables entered for setting the course of the path, e.g., the velocity of travel and the steering wheel angle, are sent to a vehicle model circuit, which determines a desired value for the controlled variable, especially for the yaw rate on the basis of a vehicle model, which is in the vehicle model circuit and simulates the properties of the vehicle, and in which this desired value, e.g., the yaw rate, is compared with a measured value of the controlled variable, e.g. the yaw rate, in a comparison unit, wherein an additional moment is calculated in a yawing moment controller, and this additional yawing moment is used to set pressure variables, which generate, via the wheel brakes of the vehicle, an additional yawing moment, which brings the controlled variable to the calculated controlled variable, characterized in that: the first vehicle model used to calculate the desired value of the controlled variable is replaced by a second vehicle model as a function of the measured velocity of travel; the model of stationary circular travel is used as the first model at low speeds, and the model of dynamic single-track travel is used as the second vehicle model at high speeds; the model changes from the stationary circular travel to the dynamic single-track travel model at the time of the change from a first velocity to a second velocity, and the model changes from the dynamic single-track model to the static model of circular travel at the time of a change from a third velocity to a fourth velocity, and that the second velocity is higher than the first one and the third velocity is higher than the fourth one, and that the first velocity is higher than the third one, and the first velocity is higher than the fourth one; the values calculated last via the circular travel model form the initial values of the single-track model at the time of the changeover from the circular travel model to the single-track model; and the initial values calculated by the circular travel model are provided with a correction factor at the time of the changeover from the single-track model to the circular travel model and the correction factors are preferably calculated as follows: ##EQU34##
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 385 words
Control circuit for controlling the driving stability of a vehicle, in which the variables entered for setting the course of the path, e.g., the velocity of travel and the steering wheel angle, are sent to a vehicle model circuit, which determines a desired value for the controlled variable, especially for the yaw rate on the basis of a vehicle model, which is in the vehicle model circuit and simulates the properties of the vehicle, and in which this desired value, e.g., the yaw rate, is compared with a measured value of the controlled variable, e.g. the yaw rate, in a comparison unit, wherein an additional moment is calculated in a yawing moment controller, and this additional yawing moment is used to set pressure variables, which generate, via the wheel brakes of the vehicle, an additional yawing moment, which brings the controlled variable to the calculated controlled variable, characterized in that: the first vehicle model used to calculate the desired value of the controlled variable is replaced by a second vehicle model as a function of the measured velocity of travel; the model of stationary circular travel is used as the first model at low speeds, and the model of dynamic single-track travel is used as the second vehicle model at high speeds; the model changes from the stationary circular travel to the dynamic single-track travel model at the time of the change from a first velocity to a second velocity, and the model changes from the dynamic single-track model to the static model of circular travel at the time of a change from a third velocity to a fourth velocity, and that the second velocity is higher than the first one and the third velocity is higher than the fourth one, and that the first velocity is higher than the third one, and the first velocity is higher than the fourth one; the values calculated last via the circular travel model form the initial values of the single-track model at the time of the changeover from the circular travel model to the single-track model; and the initial values calculated by the circular travel model are provided with a correction factor at the time of the changeover from the single-track model to the circular travel model and the correction factors are preferably calculated as follows: ##EQU34##
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 66 words
Control circuit in accordance with claim 11, characterized in that the effect of the correction factors is time-dependent and is brought continuously toward zero (forgotten), and the change in the correction factors is preferably determined according to the equation: Ψ.sub.korr (n+1)=Ψ.sub.korr (n)*λ and β.sub.korr (n+1)=β.sub.korr (n)*λ in which λ=e ##EQU35## T 0 = time interval between the calculated values and T p = the response time.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 277 words
In a control system for controlling driving stability of a vehicle which has a velocity, a steering angle, a measured yaw rate, and a plurality of brakes to which respective braking pressures are applied, individually, apparatus for providing desired yaw rate values to a yaw moment control system for determining brake adjustments which are used to apply a yawing moment to the vehicle, comprising: first modeling means for determining a first desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a first predetermined range of values; second modeling means for determining a second desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a second predetermined range of values that is different from the first predetermined range, said second modeling means including means for generating a set of output values; and means for generating a plurality of correction factors based on the set of output values, said first modeling means determining the first desired yaw rate based on the correction factors when the velocity of the vehicle passes from the second predetermined range to the first predetermined range, said first modeling means including a first one of the correction factors as a component of the desired yaw rate, said first correction factor defined by the equation: ##EQU36## where Ψ korr is the first correction factor, Ψ Desired is the desired yaw rate, δ is the steering angle, ν is the velocity, l h is a distance between a rear axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle, l v is a distance between a from axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle and v ch is given by the equation: ##EQU37##
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 277 words
In a control system for controlling driving stability of a vehicle which has a velocity, a steering angle, a measured yaw rate, and a plurality of brakes to which respective braking pressures are applied, individually, apparatus for providing desired yaw rate values to a yaw moment control system for determining brake adjustments which are used to apply a yawing moment to the vehicle, comprising: first modeling means for determining a first desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a first predetermined range of values; second modeling means for determining a second desired yaw rate while the velocity is within a second predetermined range of values that is different from the first predetermined range, said second modeling means including means for generating a set of output values; and means for generating a plurality of correction factors based on the set of output values, said first modeling means determining the first desired yaw rate based on the correction factors when the velocity of the vehicle passes from the second predetermined range to the first predetermined range, said first modeling means including a first one of the correction factors as a component of the desired yaw rate, said first correction factor defined by the equation: ##EQU36## where Ψ korr is the first correction factor, Ψ Desired is the desired yaw rate, δ is the steering angle, ν is the velocity, l h is a distance between a rear axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle, l v is a distance between a from axle of the vehicle and the center of gravity of the vehicle and v ch is given by the equation: ##EQU37##

References Cited (Backward Citations)

DE1902944U Cited
DE1455731C3 Cited
US3640156A Cited
US3719246A Cited
DE2726465A1 Cited
DE2752908C2 Cited
DE2900461C2 Cited
US4295540A Cited
DE3033653A1 Cited
EP0280879B1 Cited
EP0064669B1 Cited
DE3127302C2 Cited
DE3127605C2 Cited
EP0078655A3 Cited
EP0081758B1 Cited
US4542460A Cited
EP0106112B1 Cited
DE3342152C2 Cited
DE3343007C2 Cited
DE3309712A1 Cited
DE3421776C2 Cited
DE3425956C2 Cited
DE3438086C2 Cited
EP0148349B1 Cited
EP0145374A3 Cited
US4878557A Cited
US4625824A Cited
DE3416292A1 Cited
US4809181A Cited
EP0168356B1 Cited
DE3528536A1 Cited
DE3529928C2 Cited
US4679809A Cited
EP0180033B1 Cited
EP0180095B1 Cited
DE3541354A1 Cited
US4679808A Cited
US4758053A Cited
DE3618691A1 Cited
EP0217087B1 Cited
DE3534211A1 Cited
DE3536185C2 Cited
US4760893A Cited
DE3537452C2 Cited
US4765430A Cited
US4805105A Cited
DE3545715C2 Cited
US4763262A Cited
US4794539A Cited
US4739856A Cited
DE3643147A1 Cited
US4843557A Cited
US4872116A Cited
EP0231025B1 Cited
US4805102A Cited
DE3605600C2 Cited
US4809183A Cited
DE3708581A1 Cited
DE3612170C2 Cited
DE3616907A1 Cited
US4705922A Cited
DE3721626C2 Cited
US4836618A Cited
US4884651A Cited
EP0254943B1 Cited
US4779696A Cited
DE3724575A1 Cited
US4762196A Cited
DE3724574C2 Cited
US4809175A Cited
US4821606A Cited
DE3634301C2 Cited
US5164902A Cited
DE3634240A1 Cited
DE3736010C3 Cited
EP0265969B1 Cited
US4922427A Cited
DE3641908A1 Cited
US4866623A Cited
EP0272700B1 Cited
US4836619A Cited
US5001636A Cited
US5333058A Cited
EP0282041B1 Cited
EP0576044B1 Cited
US4841815A Cited
EP0342200B1 Cited
DE3710870A1 Cited
EP0288666B1 Cited
US4868755A Cited
US4939656A Cited
EP0296756B1 Cited
US5089967A Cited
US4865148A Cited
DE3728572C2 Cited
US5332300A Cited
DE3832924C2 Cited
EP0311131A3 Cited
DE3836713A1 Cited
DE3839710C2 Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2001-04-20 2001-10-20 2002-04-21 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2005-04-20 2005-10-20 2006-04-21 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2009-04-20 2009-10-20 2010-04-21 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag