US4760893A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of controlling slipping or spinning of a vehicle wheel
Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH
•
Filing: 1986-10-17
•
Granted: 1988-08-02
•
Expires: 2006-10-17
Abstract
Abstract To prevent slipping or spinning of a driven wheel which, selectively, can be braked or supplied with reduced torque from a vehicle engine, a reference speed is determined against which slipping or tendency to slip is measured. The reference value for slip measuring, derived from non-driven or rolling wheels, is tested for physically impossible conditions and, if such physically impossible conditions obtain, they are disregarded when determining slipping or tendency to slip. Proper speed values can be stored, utilized for subsequent measurement, directly or modified, which may also be made speed dependent, or dependent on differences between the speeds of two rolling wheels.
Inventors
- 👤 Alfred Sigl
- 👤 Thomas Isella
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 06:56
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60T; B60T8/00; B60T8/17; B60T8/173; B60T8/175
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
257 words
A method of controlling slipping or spinning of a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the vehicle has driven wheels and non-driven or rolling wheels, and a slip control system for the driven wheels, comprising the steps of sensing if a respective driven wheel slips or spins above a predetermined slip level, or rotates under conditions indicating a tendency to slip or spin above said predetermined slip level; monitoring the speed of at least one of the rolling wheels and deriving rolling wheel output signals representative of said monitored speed; sensing the speed of at least one driven wheel and deriving driven wheel output signals representative of said sensed speed; generating a reference parameter signal representative of the speed of the at least one rolling wheel; comparing the driven wheel output signals with the reference parameter and deriving a comparison signal indicative of slip or incipient slip; decreasing the speed of rotation of said respective driven wheel when said comparison signal representative of slip indicates wheel slip above said predetermined slip level; in successive time steps, testing the rolling wheel output signals representative of the speed of the rolling wheel to determine if the signal has a characteristic indicative of change of speed of the rolling wheel which is not physically possible, and if the test indicates a condition of the signal representative of a physically impossible condition, generating, as the comparison signal, a new signal which is representative of at least a lesser change of speed than the rolling wheel output signal representative of said monitored speed.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
257 words
A method of controlling slipping or spinning of a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the vehicle has driven wheels and non-driven or rolling wheels, and a slip control system for the driven wheels, comprising the steps of sensing if a respective driven wheel slips or spins above a predetermined slip level, or rotates under conditions indicating a tendency to slip or spin above said predetermined slip level; monitoring the speed of at least one of the rolling wheels and deriving rolling wheel output signals representative of said monitored speed; sensing the speed of at least one driven wheel and deriving driven wheel output signals representative of said sensed speed; generating a reference parameter signal representative of the speed of the at least one rolling wheel; comparing the driven wheel output signals with the reference parameter and deriving a comparison signal indicative of slip or incipient slip; decreasing the speed of rotation of said respective driven wheel when said comparison signal representative of slip indicates wheel slip above said predetermined slip level; in successive time steps, testing the rolling wheel output signals representative of the speed of the rolling wheel to determine if the signal has a characteristic indicative of change of speed of the rolling wheel which is not physically possible, and if the test indicates a condition of the signal representative of a physically impossible condition, generating, as the comparison signal, a new signal which is representative of at least a lesser change of speed than the rolling wheel output signal representative of said monitored speed.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of testing the signal to determine if the signal has characteristics indicative of a physically impossible condition comprises monitoring temporally sequential signals, and determining if the second subsequent signal exceeds a threshold or limit value.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the step of obtaining the reference parameter comprises determining the speed of two rolling wheels; determining the difference in speed between said two rolling wheels and obtaining a rolling wheel speed difference signal; and wherein said modifying step comprises decreasing the limit or threshold value if the rolling speed difference signal indicates a speed difference of the rolling wheels in excess of a predetermined value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the threshold or limit value, as modified, is approximately 0.15 g.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said testing step comprises monitoring the speed of the rolling wheel and determining if the wheel has a rate of change of speed in positive or negative direction which exceeds a threshold or limit value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 3, wherein, if the rolling wheel is unbraked, said threshold value of a physically impossible condition is approximately -0.3 g.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1, wherein, if the rolling wheel is braked, said threshold value indicative of a physically impossible condition is approximately ±1 g.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 1, including the step of storing the comparison signal; and wherein, upon determining that a comparison signal is representative of a physically impossible condition, a stored prior comparison signal is subsequently utilized as the comparison signal.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 1, including the step of storing a comparison signal; and wherein, upon determining that a subsequent comparison signal is representative of a physically impossible condition, the prior, stored comparison signal is recalled and modified and, as so modified, utilized as the comparison signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 1, wherein (FIG. 3) the step of modifying said comparison signal comprises establishing a time interval; and blocking application of said comparison signal for the time duration of said time interval.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
91 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating the new signal comprises sensing the driven wheel speed (V); approximating the reference parameter to be representative of a theoretical speed condition of the vehicle, corresponding to deceleration of the vehicle; comparing the approximate reference parameter and the driven wheel speed and determining if a predetermined difference (ΔV) between the sensed wheel speed and the approximated reference parameter exists; and, if said predetermined difference exists, modifying the approximate reference parameter by decreasing said approximate reference parameter at a predetermined negative rate.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 11, comprising the steps of operating the method of claim 11 in control cycles; and wherein the step of approximating the reference parameter comprises storing an actual reference speed of a prior control cycle, and utilizing said stored reference parameter as the reference speed in a subsequent cycle.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method of claim 11, comprising the step of operating the method of claim 11 in control cycles; and wherein the step of utilizing said reference parameter comprises storing an actual reference speed of a prior control cycle and utilizing said stored reference speed, decreased at a slow negative rate, as the reference parameter in a subsequent cycle; and if the comparison step has determined that said predetermined difference exists, decreasing the reference parameter at a faster negative rate.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method of claim 11, comprising the steps of approximating the reference parameter to a theoretical vehicle speed condition, in decreasing direction (a) in accordance with a slowly decreasing time function having gradually decreasing slope, and corresponding to only little vehicle deceleration, for a predetermined time duration T, and (b) said time duration in accordance with a maximum negative slope corresponding to vehicle deceleration of about -0.3 g maximum.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 11, including the step of determining if the vehicle speed (V) exceeds a predetermined value; and carrying out the steps of claim 13 only if the vehicle speed is below said predetermined value.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 11, including the step of modifying the predetermined difference (ΔV) by decreasing the value of the predetermined difference at which the approximate reference parameter is modified with increase of vehicle speed.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 11, including the step of determining a time interval, and carrying out said step of decreasing the stored reference parameter at the slow negative rate only for said predetermined time interval and, thereafter, blocking further decrease at said slow negative rate.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 11, including the step of determining if the vehicle operates in a curved path; and, if a curved path is determined, utilizing said stored reference parameter, decreased, at said slow negative rate.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said steps of deriving rolling wheel output signals and driven wheel output signals comprise deriving said rolling wheel and driven wheel output signals in digital signal form.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
192 words
Method of controlling slipping or spinning of a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the vehicle has driven wheels and non-driven or rolling wheels, and a slip control system for the driven wheels, sensing if a respective driven wheel slips or spins, or rotates under conditions indicating a tendency to slip or spin; monitoring the speed of at least one of the rolling wheels and deriving an output signal representative of said monitored speed; and decreasing the speed of rotation of said respective driven wheel, including comparing the speed of at least one of the driven wheels and a reference parameter which includes a value representative of the speed of at least one of the rolling wheels, and deriving a comparison signal, comprising, in accordance with the invention, the steps of approximating the reference speed to a theoretical vehicle speed condition, in decreasing direction (a) in accordance with a slowly decreasing time function having gradually decreasing slope, and corresponding to only little vehicle deceleration, for a predetermined time duration T, and (b) after said time duration T, in accordance with a maximum negative slope corresponding to vehicle deceleration of about -0.3 g maximum.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
192 words
Method of controlling slipping or spinning of a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the vehicle has driven wheels and non-driven or rolling wheels, and a slip control system for the driven wheels, sensing if a respective driven wheel slips or spins, or rotates under conditions indicating a tendency to slip or spin; monitoring the speed of at least one of the rolling wheels and deriving an output signal representative of said monitored speed; and decreasing the speed of rotation of said respective driven wheel, including comparing the speed of at least one of the driven wheels and a reference parameter which includes a value representative of the speed of at least one of the rolling wheels, and deriving a comparison signal, comprising, in accordance with the invention, the steps of approximating the reference speed to a theoretical vehicle speed condition, in decreasing direction (a) in accordance with a slowly decreasing time function having gradually decreasing slope, and corresponding to only little vehicle deceleration, for a predetermined time duration T, and (b) after said time duration T, in accordance with a maximum negative slope corresponding to vehicle deceleration of about -0.3 g maximum.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 20, wherein said time duration T is in the order of about 2 seconds.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-08-02 | 1992-02-01 | 1992-08-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-08-02 | 1996-02-01 | 1996-08-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-08-02 | 2000-02-01 | 2000-08-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |