US4965515A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and method of testing a semiconductor wafer
Assignee: Tokyo Electron Ltd
•
Filing: 1989-04-26
•
Granted: 1990-10-23
•
Expires: 2009-04-26
Abstract
Abstract An apparatus and method of testing semiconductor wafer, which are capable of properly processing inking errors caused in the process of determining whether the chips are good or bad. The apparatus comprises an inker for markings those chips which have been found defective by probing test, a TV camera for imaging the chips including those which have been found defective and marked, a computer system for comparing an image-signal with a reference-signal, and determining that the chip has no marking when the signals coincide and that the chip has a marking when the signals do not coincide, and a counter for counting those chips which have been determined to have markings or no marking by the computer system.
Inventors
- 👤 Wataru Karasawa
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 06:27
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/2851; G01R31/302; G01R31/308; G01R31/311
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
154 words
An apparatus for testing a semiconductor wafer on which devices are arranged at regular intervals in a matrix pattern, said apparatus comprising: probing test means for electrically testing the devices sequentially; marking means for marking those of the devices in the matrix pattern which are determined to be defective by the probing test means; image scanning means for optically scanning the semiconductor wafer including those devices which are determined to be defective and bear markings, and generating an image-signal representing the scanned image of the semiconductor wafer; comparing/determining means for comparing the image-signal with a reference-signal and determining that the device does not have a marking when the signals coincide with each other and that the device has a marking when the signals do not coincide with each other; and counting means for counting those of the devices which have been determined by the comparing/determining means to have markings or not to have markings.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
154 words
An apparatus for testing a semiconductor wafer on which devices are arranged at regular intervals in a matrix pattern, said apparatus comprising: probing test means for electrically testing the devices sequentially; marking means for marking those of the devices in the matrix pattern which are determined to be defective by the probing test means; image scanning means for optically scanning the semiconductor wafer including those devices which are determined to be defective and bear markings, and generating an image-signal representing the scanned image of the semiconductor wafer; comparing/determining means for comparing the image-signal with a reference-signal and determining that the device does not have a marking when the signals coincide with each other and that the device has a marking when the signals do not coincide with each other; and counting means for counting those of the devices which have been determined by the comparing/determining means to have markings or not to have markings.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
33 words
The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said counting means counts only those devices in the matrix pattern on the object which have been determined to have no marking by the comparing/determining means.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
44 words
The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the devices in the matrix pattern on the object determined to have markings by the comparing/determining means include those which are marked because of marking errors even if they have been found good by the probing test.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said imaging means is a CCD camera or an ITV camera.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
55 words
The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the image of each of devices picked up by the imaging means is divided into fine picture elements and said comparing/determining means determines that the marking on a device is a pseudo-marking on the basis of those picture elements of the device on which the marking is present.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for testing a semiconductor wafer on which devices are formed at regular intervals in a matrix pattern, said method comprising the steps of: marking those of the devices which have been found defective by an electrical probing test; image-scanning the semiconductor wafer including those devices which are determined to be defective and bear markings, and generating an image-signal representing the scanned image of the semiconductor wafer; comparing said image-signal with a reference signal; determining that the device does not have a marking when the signals coincide with each other and that the device has a marking when the signals do not coincide with each other; and counting those devices which have been determined by the comparing and determining steps to have markings or not to have markings.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for testing a semiconductor wafer on which devices are formed at regular intervals in a matrix pattern, said method comprising the steps of: marking those of the devices which have been found defective by an electrical probing test; image-scanning the semiconductor wafer including those devices which are determined to be defective and bear markings, and generating an image-signal representing the scanned image of the semiconductor wafer; comparing said image-signal with a reference signal; determining that the device does not have a marking when the signals coincide with each other and that the device has a marking when the signals do not coincide with each other; and counting those devices which have been determined by the comparing and determining steps to have markings or not to have markings.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method according to claim 6, whereby only those devices which have been determined to have no marking by the comparing and determining steps are counted in the course of the counting step.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method according to claim 6, whereby the devices determined to have markings according to the comparing and determining steps include those which come to have markings because of marking errors even if they have been found good by the probing test.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method according to claim 6, whereby the image of each of devices in the matrix pattern picked up in the course of the imaging step is divided into fine picture elements and the marking on a device is determined to be a pseudo-marking on the basis of those picture elements of the device on which the marking is present according to the comparing and determining steps.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2311942A
Cited
US3991302A
Cited
US4056716A
Cited
US4101759A
Cited
US4097226A
Cited
JPS5730964A
Cited
US4454585A
Cited
JPS5828546A
Cited
JPS5895271A
Cited
JPS58172562A
Cited
US4507605A
Cited
US4468260A
Cited
JPS5935441A
Cited
US4545327A
Cited
US4550245A
Cited
US4535228A
Cited
JPS59184542A
Cited
JPS6024031A
Cited
US4649261A
Cited
US4755747A
Cited
US4758782A
Cited
US4786867A
Cited
JPS6399541A
Cited
US4755654A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-10-22 | 1994-04-23 | 1994-10-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-10-22 | 1998-04-23 | 1998-10-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-10-22 | 2002-04-23 | 2002-10-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |