US4056716A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Defect inspection of objects such as electronic circuits
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1976-06-30
•
Granted: 1977-11-01
•
Expires: 1996-06-30
Abstract
Abstract Successive areas of a high-resolution object image are compared with corresponding areas of a low-resolution master pattern to produce signals representing the quality of the object. Comparison is effected by detecting which of a set of features occurs in each area of the object image, detecting which feature of the same set occurs in a larger area of the master pattern, and determining whether these two features are the same.
Inventors
- 👤 Duane Willard Baxter
- 👤 Richard Edward Shipway
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 15:14
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/302; G01R31/308; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/84; G01N21/88; G01N21/95; G01N21/956; H; H05; H05B; H05B39/00; H05B39/04; H05B39/08; H05B39/083
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
158 words
A method of inspecting an object for defects, comprising the steps of: a. producing a high-resolution electronic representation of an object, said representation having a plurality of cells each corresponding to a first amount of area on said object; b. storing a low-resolution master pattern having a plurality of cells each representing a second, substantially larger amount of area on said object; c. detecting a first of a predetermined set of features in a first window comprising a plurality of said cells of said high-resolution representation; d. detecting a second feature of said set in a second window comprising a plurality of said cells of said low-resolution master pattern, said second window representing a substantially larger total area on said object than the area represented by said first window; e. comparing said first feature with said second feature; and f. repeating steps (c), (d) and (e) for different ones of said windows, representing further areas on said object.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
158 words
A method of inspecting an object for defects, comprising the steps of: a. producing a high-resolution electronic representation of an object, said representation having a plurality of cells each corresponding to a first amount of area on said object; b. storing a low-resolution master pattern having a plurality of cells each representing a second, substantially larger amount of area on said object; c. detecting a first of a predetermined set of features in a first window comprising a plurality of said cells of said high-resolution representation; d. detecting a second feature of said set in a second window comprising a plurality of said cells of said low-resolution master pattern, said second window representing a substantially larger total area on said object than the area represented by said first window; e. comparing said first feature with said second feature; and f. repeating steps (c), (d) and (e) for different ones of said windows, representing further areas on said object.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
171 words
Comparison means for an automatic inspection device, comprising: a high-resolution register for receiving and shifting an image of an object to be inspected, said first register having a plurality of cells each representing different first areas on said object; a low-resolution register for receiving and shifting a master pattern of an ideal form of said object, said low-resolution register being divided into a plurality of cells each representing different second areas on said object, each of said second areas corresponding to a plurality of said first areas on said object; a first feature detector coupled to a group of said cells of said high-resolution register for detecting the presence of absence of a predetermined set of features; a second feature detector coupled to a group of said cells of said low-resolution register for detecting the presence or absence of said set of features; gating means coupled to said feature detectors for producing a signal indicating whether or not the particular features found by said first and second detectors are the same.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
171 words
Comparison means for an automatic inspection device, comprising: a high-resolution register for receiving and shifting an image of an object to be inspected, said first register having a plurality of cells each representing different first areas on said object; a low-resolution register for receiving and shifting a master pattern of an ideal form of said object, said low-resolution register being divided into a plurality of cells each representing different second areas on said object, each of said second areas corresponding to a plurality of said first areas on said object; a first feature detector coupled to a group of said cells of said high-resolution register for detecting the presence of absence of a predetermined set of features; a second feature detector coupled to a group of said cells of said low-resolution register for detecting the presence or absence of said set of features; gating means coupled to said feature detectors for producing a signal indicating whether or not the particular features found by said first and second detectors are the same.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
37 words
The comparision means of claim 2, wherein said group of cells of said high-resolution register includes a substantially smaller area on said object than a larger area included in said group of cells of said low-resolution register.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
The comparison means of claim 3, wherein said larger area includes and surrounds said first area.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
The comparison means of claim 3, wherein said smaller area has substantially the same extent as the area on said object corresponding to a single one of said cells of said low-resolution register.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The comparison means of claim 2, wherein both said high-resolution register and said low-resolution register comprise a shift register having a plurality of stages.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
The comparison means of claim 2, wherein said first and said second feature detectors comprise Boolean logic gates having inputs coupled to said registers.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The comparison means of claim 7, wherein said gating means comprises Boolean logic gates having inputs coupled to said feature detectors.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3463007A
Cited
US3613081A
Cited
US3812426A
Cited
US3760355A
Cited
US3816719A
Cited
US3887762A
Cited
US3790767A
Cited
US3908118A
Cited
US3889053A
Cited
US3991302A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-10-31 | 1981-05-02 | 1981-11-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-10-31 | 1985-05-02 | 1985-11-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-10-31 | 1989-05-02 | 1989-11-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |