US5610831A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Semiconductor element layout method employing process migration
Assignee: Toshiba Corp
•
Filing: 1994-11-04
•
Granted: 1997-03-11
•
Expires: 2014-11-04
Abstract
Abstract A semiconductor element layout method carries out process migration to convert a first mask layout prepared for integrated circuits according to a first design rule into a second mask layout that follows a second design rule. The process migration selectively removes substrate contacts that are present between adjacent elements on the first mask layout.
Inventors
- 👤 Nobu Matsumoto
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 19:14
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F30/00; G06F30/30; G06F30/39; G06F30/398
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
93 words
A semiconductor element layout method comprising the steps of: selectively removing substrate contacts from a first mask layout prepared for integrated circuits according to a first design rule which requires at least a first minimum spacing between the substrate contacts; and carrying out process migration to convert the first mask layout, from which some of said substrate contacts have been removed, into a second mask layout that follows a second design rule which requires at least a second minimum spacing that is smaller than the first minimum spacing of the first design rule.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
93 words
A semiconductor element layout method comprising the steps of: selectively removing substrate contacts from a first mask layout prepared for integrated circuits according to a first design rule which requires at least a first minimum spacing between the substrate contacts; and carrying out process migration to convert the first mask layout, from which some of said substrate contacts have been removed, into a second mask layout that follows a second design rule which requires at least a second minimum spacing that is smaller than the first minimum spacing of the first design rule.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the step of selectively removing substrate contacts that are present between adjacent elements.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step carries substrate contacts that are present in a space between dissimilar wells on the first mask layout into the second mask layout, and removes substrate contacts that are present in the wells on the first mask layout.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step removes substrate contacts that are on or attached to a power supply trunk on the first mask layout.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step removes substrate contacts that are adjacent to each other on the first mask layout.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step keeps substrate contacts that are indirectly connected to a power supply trunk through a layer that is different from the power supply trunk, and removes substrate contacts that are directly connected to the power supply trunk.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step converts substrate contacts on the first mask layout into Joint contacts on the second mask layout.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step converts substrate contacts on the first mask layout into butting contacts on the second mask layout.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step converts substrate contacts on the first mask layout into borderless contacts on the second mask layout.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step divides a substrate contact on the first mask layout into square contacts of uniform size.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step removes substrate contacts from a power supply line on the first mask layout and converts the power supply line into a path of uniform thickness on the second mask layout.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
89 words
The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the process migration step grows contacts, substrate diffusion layers, and layers to be short-circuited to them, obtains an OR region of these grown contacts and layers, obtains an ANDNOT region of the OR region and wells, removes a power source from a metal conductive layer, inverts the power-source-removed metal conductive layer, scales down the inverted region by a predetermined value, finds an AND region of the ANDNOT region and the scaled-down inverted region, and forms substrate contacts in the AND region.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the step of preparing a symbolic layout according to the the first mask layout with the selectively removed substrate contacts, and forming substrate contacts on the symbolic layout.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second mask layout is a symbolic layout.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
99 words
A semiconductor element layout method comprising the steps of: selectively removing substrate contacts from a first mask layout prepared for integrated circuits according to a first design rule which requires at least a first minimum width for each of the substrate contacts; and carrying out process migration to convert the first mask layout, from which some of said substrate contacts have been removed, into a second mask layout that follows a second design rule which requires at least a second minimum width for the substrate contacts that is less that the first minimum width of the first design rule.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
99 words
A semiconductor element layout method comprising the steps of: selectively removing substrate contacts from a first mask layout prepared for integrated circuits according to a first design rule which requires at least a first minimum width for each of the substrate contacts; and carrying out process migration to convert the first mask layout, from which some of said substrate contacts have been removed, into a second mask layout that follows a second design rule which requires at least a second minimum width for the substrate contacts that is less that the first minimum width of the first design rule.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as claimed in claim 15, further comprising the step of selectively removing the substrate contacts that are present between adjacent elements.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the process migration step carries substrate contacts that are present in a space between dissimilar wells on the first mask layout into the second mask layout, and removes substrate contacts that are present in the wells on the first mask layout.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the process migration step keeps substrate contacts that are indirectly connected to a power supply trunk through a layer that is different from the power supply trunk, and removes substrate contracts that are directly connected to the power supply trunk.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the process migration step converts substrate contacts on the first mask layout into joint contacts on the second mask layout.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the process migration step converts substrate contacts on the first mask layout into butting contacts on the second mask layout.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5097422A
Cited
US4952522A
Cited
US4910168A
Cited
US5018074A
Cited
US5477467A
Cited
US5019534A
Cited
US5225993A
Cited
US5253182A
Cited
US5247455A
Cited
US5369596A
Cited
US5381343A
Cited
US5416722A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-03-10 | 2000-09-09 | 2001-03-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-03-10 | 2004-09-09 | 2005-03-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-03-10 | 2008-09-09 | 2009-03-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |