Patent US6553559B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US6553559B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method to determine optical proximity correction and assist feature rules which account for variations in mask dimensions

Assignee: GlobalFoundries US Inc
•
Filing: 2001-01-05
•
Granted: 2003-04-22
•
Expires: 2021-01-05
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Optical proximity correction (OPC) and assist feature rules are generated using a process window (PW) analysis. A reference pitch is chosen and the mask bias is found that optimizes the process window. This can be done using standard process window analysis or through a weighted process window (WPW) analysis which accounts for focus and dose distributions that are expected in a real process. The WPW analysis gives not only the optimum mask bias, but also the center focus and dose conditions for the optimum process centering. A series of other pitches and mask biases are then analyzed by finding the common process window with the reference pitch. For the standard PW analysis, a common process window is found. For the WPW analysis, the WPW is computed at the center focus and dose conditions found for the reference pitch. If mask or lens errors are to be accounted for, then multiple structures can be included in the analysis. Once the common process windows for the mask features of interest have been computed, functional fits to the data can be found. Once the functional forms have been found for each of the OPC parameters, the rules table can be determined by solving for the spacings of interest in the design.

Inventors

  • 👤 Lars W. Liebmann
  • 👤 Scott Mansfield
  • 👤 Alfred K. Wong

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 10:05
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F1/00; G03F1/36; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70425; G03F7/70433; G03F7/70441

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 39
Claim 1
Independent Claim 107 words
A method to determine optical proximity correction and assist feature rules which account for variations in mask dimensions, exposure tool and process in the manufacture of an integrated circuit, comprising steps of: choosing a reference pitch and finding mask bias for features of interest which optimize a process window; analyzing a series of other pitches and mask biases for features of interest by finding a common process window with the reference pitch; computing functional fits to data found for the common process window for the mask features of interest; and determining a rules table by solving the functional fits for spacings of interest in a product design.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 107 words
A method to determine optical proximity correction and assist feature rules which account for variations in mask dimensions, exposure tool and process in the manufacture of an integrated circuit, comprising steps of: choosing a reference pitch and finding mask bias for features of interest which optimize a process window; analyzing a series of other pitches and mask biases for features of interest by finding a common process window with the reference pitch; computing functional fits to data found for the common process window for the mask features of interest; and determining a rules table by solving the functional fits for spacings of interest in a product design.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said reference pitch is approximately equivalent to the minimum pitch allowed in said product design.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of claim 2 , wherein said reference pitch is sufficiently small so that no assist features can be placed in the space between two main features.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 3 , wherein said reference pitch is optimized by finding the main feature bias that optimizes the process window for this pitch.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 2 , wherein said mask bias is such that on the mask, said reference pitch has approximately a 1:1 line-space ratio.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said common PW is weighted PW, which incorporates expected focus and dose distributions.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said common PW is multi-dimensional PW, which incorporates sources of error other than focus and does.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 7 , wherein other sources include mask CD errors, lens aberrations and exposure tool flare.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 7 , wherein said multi-dimensional PW is weighted multi-dimensional PW, which incorporates expected distributions of all variables.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said reference pitch and said other pitches include features that are printed in photoresist at a dimension that is consistent with the minimum sized features in said product design.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method of claim 10 , wherein said minimum sized feature is printed in photoresist at a dimension smaller than its designed size.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said mask features of interest include main feature edge bias, assist feature sizes, and assist feature locations.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 12 , wherein up to four assists can be placed in said spacing of interest.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 12 , wherein more than four assists can be placed in said spacing of interest.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method of claim 12 , wherein all assist features have the same size.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 12 , wherein assist features placed in the center of a space can differ in size by one grid point from all other assist features, all other assist features being the same size.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 48 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said rules table includes transition points which are spacings where an additional assist feature is added, so that spacings greater than or equal to a transition point have at least one more assist feature than spacings less than that transition point.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said transition points are determined by comparing said common process windows utilizing differing number of assist features at the same spacing.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method of claim 18 , wherein said transition point is set at the spacing where adding an additional assist feature improves said common process window over not adding an additional assist feature, provided that adding an additional assist feature does not violate any mask manufactureability rules.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 41 words
The method of claim 19 , wherein said mask manufactureability rules include minimum main feature size, minimum assist feature size, maximum assist feature size, minimum spacing from assist feature to main feature, and minimum spacing from assist feature to assist feature.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said functional fits are curve fits to sets of data.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method of claim 21 , where said curve fits are computed by weighting each member of said set by a weighting function of said common process window for that member.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 22 , wherein said weighting function is of the form PW to the n power, wherein PW is a measurement of the common process window.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 23 , wherein n is adjusted depending on the amount of noise in said set of data.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method of claim 23 , wherein n falls in the range of 2≦n≦10.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 22 , wherein said weighting function is also a function of the step size between mask features of interest utilized in said set of data.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 41 words
The method of claim 21 , wherein multiple independent curve fits are computed on multiple independent sets of data, each data set corresponding to mask layouts that employ the same number of assist features in the space between two main features.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein said curve fits are to polynomial functions for said mask features of interest as a function of the spacing between the designed main features.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 27 , wherein said curve fits are to polynomial functions for said mask features of interest as a function of normalized spacing.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of claim 29 , wherein the normalized spacing is defined as the spacing between the designed main features divided by one more than the number of assist features placed in that spacing.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 66 words
The method of claim 29 , wherein the normalized spacing is defined as the spacing between the designed main features divided by one more than the number of assist features placed in that spacing, except for the case wherein no assist features are placed in this space, in which case the normalized spacing is defined as the spacing between the designed main features divided by two.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 21 , wherein said sets of data are determined by measuring test patterns on wafers that are processed in a manner similar to that used to process wafers using said product design.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 32 , wherein said test patterns are created by exposing a test photomask.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 33 , wherein said test photomask is designed at a design grid that differs from the design grid of said product design.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 32 , wherein said test patterns are created by exposing patterns found in a kerf or scribe of a product design.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said rules table is determined at a grid that differs from said product design grid.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein said rules table grid is equal to said product design grid divided by an integer.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 43 words
The method of claim 23 , wherein said PW is equal to a value or a combination of values from a group of measurements consisting of: maximum depth of focus, maximum exposure latitude, depth of focus at 10% exposure latitude, and total window.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2006-04-21 2006-10-21 2007-04-22 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2010-04-21 2010-10-21 2011-04-22 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2014-04-21 2014-10-21 2015-04-22 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag