US5705301A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Performing optical proximity correction with the aid of design rule checkers
Assignee: Bell Semiconductor LLC
•
Filing: 1996-02-27
•
Granted: 1998-01-06
•
Expires: 2016-02-27
Abstract
Abstract A method is disclosed for identifying regions of an integrated circuit layout design where optical proximity correction will be most useful and then performing optical proximity correction on those regions only. More specifically, the method includes the following steps: (a) analyzing an integrated circuit layout design with a design role checker to locate features of the integrated circuit layout design meeting predefined criteria; and (b) performing optical proximity correction on the features meeting the criteria in order to generate a reticle design. The criteria employed by the design role checker to select features include outside corners on patterns, inside corners on features, feature size, feature shape, and feature angles.
Inventors
- 👤 Mario Garza
- 👤 Nicholas K. Eib
- 👤 John V. Jensen
- 👤 Keith K. Chao
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 04:08
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F1/00; G03F1/36; G03F7/70425; G03F7/70433; G03F7/70441
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
110 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design, the method comprising the following steps: (a) analyzing the integrated circuit layout design with a design rule checker to locate features of said integrated circuit layout design meeting predefined criteria; (b) partitioning said integrated circuit layout design meeting defined criteria into a plurality of grid regions such that at least some grid regions enclose at least part of said features meeting said predefined criteria, and at least some grid regions do not enclose said features meeting said predefined criteria; and (c) performing optical proximity correction on said features meeting said criteria to generate a reticle design.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
110 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design, the method comprising the following steps: (a) analyzing the integrated circuit layout design with a design rule checker to locate features of said integrated circuit layout design meeting predefined criteria; (b) partitioning said integrated circuit layout design meeting defined criteria into a plurality of grid regions such that at least some grid regions enclose at least part of said features meeting said predefined criteria, and at least some grid regions do not enclose said features meeting said predefined criteria; and (c) performing optical proximity correction on said features meeting said criteria to generate a reticle design.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
66 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction of claim 1, further comprising a step of providing a partial layout design which includes said features of the integrated circuit layout design meeting said predefined criteria but does not include features not meeting said predefined criteria, wherein said step of providing the partial layout design is performed before said step of partitioning and performing optical proximity correction.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
68 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction of claim 2, wherein the step of performing optical proximity correction on said partial layout design includes a separate evaluation of each one of said plurality of grid regions such that only those grid regions which enclose said features meeting said predefined criteria are subject to said step of performing optical proximity correction to form a corrected partial layout design.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
43 words
Computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction of claim 3, further comprising a step of substituting those grid regions from the corrected partial layout design that enclose said features meeting said predefined criteria for corresponding grid regions in the integrated circuit layout design.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
47 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity corrections of claim 1, wherein said predefined criteria include one or more items selected from the group consisting of inside corners of features, outside corners of features, polygonal classes of features, feature size, interfeature spacing, and angle sizes of features.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction of claim 5, wherein said predefined criteria include features having critical dimensions of less than about 1 μm.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity corrections of claim 1, wherein said predefined criteria include features having critical dimensions of less than about 0.5 μm.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
137 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design, the method comprising the following steps: (a) analyzing the integrated circuit layout design with a design rule checker to locate features of said integrated circuit layout design meeting a predefined criteria; (b) separating features that do not meet said predefined criteria from the integrated circuit layout design to define a partial layout design; (c) partitioning the partial layout design into a plurality of grid regions, some of the plurality of grid regions enclosing at least a portion of a feature in the partial layout design; (d) marching sequentially through each of the plurality of grid regions in the partial layout design; and (e) performing optical proximity correction for selected ones of the plurality of grid regions to produce a corrected partial layout design.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
137 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design, the method comprising the following steps: (a) analyzing the integrated circuit layout design with a design rule checker to locate features of said integrated circuit layout design meeting a predefined criteria; (b) separating features that do not meet said predefined criteria from the integrated circuit layout design to define a partial layout design; (c) partitioning the partial layout design into a plurality of grid regions, some of the plurality of grid regions enclosing at least a portion of a feature in the partial layout design; (d) marching sequentially through each of the plurality of grid regions in the partial layout design; and (e) performing optical proximity correction for selected ones of the plurality of grid regions to produce a corrected partial layout design.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
42 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design as recited in claim 8, wherein the selected ones of the plurality of grid regions enclose at least a portion of the feature in the partial layout design.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
47 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design as recited in claim 9, further comprising the step of: skipping the optical proximity correction step for grid regions not enclosing at least the portion of the feature in the partial layout design.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
48 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design as recited in claim 8, further comprising a step of: joining said corrected partial layout design with said features that do not meet said predefined criteria to produce a corrected integrated circuit layout design.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
82 words
A computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design as recited in claim 11, further comprising a steps of: transferring said corrected integrated circuit layout design to a reticle for use in a photolithography stepper apparatus; providing a photoresist covered substrate; and activating the stepper apparatus to apply light through said corrected integrated circuit layout design onto the photoresist covered substrate to define a pattern that is substantially similar to that of said integrated circuit layout design.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
34 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design as recited in claim 8, wherein said predefined criteria include features having critical dimensions of less than about 1 μm.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
The computer-implemented method of performing optical proximity correction on an integrated circuit layout design as recited in claim 8, wherein said predefined criteria include features having critical dimensions of less than about 0.5 μm.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
102 words
A computer-implemented optical proximity correction process comprising: (a) analyzing the integrated circuit layout design with a design role checker to locate features of said integrated circuit layout design meeting a predefined criteria; (b) partitioning the features meeting the predefined criteria into a plurality of grid regions, some of the plurality of grid regions enclosing at least a portion of the features meeting the predefined criteria; (c) marching sequentially through each of the plurality of grid regions; and (d) performing optical proximity correction in grid regions where at least the portion of the features meeting the predefined criteria are found in the marching.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
102 words
A computer-implemented optical proximity correction process comprising: (a) analyzing the integrated circuit layout design with a design role checker to locate features of said integrated circuit layout design meeting a predefined criteria; (b) partitioning the features meeting the predefined criteria into a plurality of grid regions, some of the plurality of grid regions enclosing at least a portion of the features meeting the predefined criteria; (c) marching sequentially through each of the plurality of grid regions; and (d) performing optical proximity correction in grid regions where at least the portion of the features meeting the predefined criteria are found in the marching.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
22 words
A computer-implemented optical proximity correction process as recited in claim 15, wherein the optical proximity correction produces a corrected partial layout design.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
30 words
A computer-implemented optical proximity correction process as recited in claim 15, wherein a grid density of the plurality of grid regions is adjustable to produce more or less grids regions.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
26 words
A computer-implemented optical proximity correction process as recited in claim 15, wherein said predefined criteria include features having critical dimensions of less than about 1 μm.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4812962A
Cited
US5553273A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-01-05 | 2001-07-07 | 2002-01-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-01-05 | 2005-07-07 | 2006-01-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-01-05 | 2009-07-07 | 2010-01-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |