Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 39
Claim 1
Independent Claim
83 words
A method for hybridization analysis between a sample and a probe, the analysis utilizing an electronic stringency control device, comprising the steps of: providing the sample and probe with a fluorescent label under hybridization conditions on the electronic stringency control device, forming a fluorescently labelled hybridization product, monitoring the fluorescence from the hybridization product, subjecting the hybridization product to varying electrophoretic force, and analyzing the fluorescent signal from the flourescently labeled hybridization product for variance as a function of said varying electrophoretic force.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
83 words
A method for hybridization analysis between a sample and a probe, the analysis utilizing an electronic stringency control device, comprising the steps of: providing the sample and probe with a fluorescent label under hybridization conditions on the electronic stringency control device, forming a fluorescently labelled hybridization product, monitoring the fluorescence from the hybridization product, subjecting the hybridization product to varying electrophoretic force, and analyzing the fluorescent signal from the flourescently labeled hybridization product for variance as a function of said varying electrophoretic force.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 wherein the fluorescence is analyzed for the fluorescent perturbation value.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 2 wherein the fluorescence perturbation value is measured for the onset value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 2 wherein the fluorescence perturbation value is measured for its height.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 2 wherein the fluorescence perturbation value is measured for the slope.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 wherein the fluorescence is analyzed for the power level of the perturbation.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 further including the steps of: determining a second measure of hybridization between the sample and the probe, and combining the information obtained by the first analysis including the step of subjecting the hybridization product to the varying electrophoretic force in the second measure to provide a indication of hybridization.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 7 wherein the second measure of hybridization includes determination of the electronic melting point.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 wherein the fluorescent label is placed in proximity to the initial denaturation site.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
22 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claims 1 or 9 wherein the fluorescent label is intercalated adjacent a single base mismatch site.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 10 wherein the fluorescent label is ethidium bromide.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 10 wherein the fluorescent label is acridine.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
31 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claims 1 or 7 wherein the electrophoretic force is in an amount less than is necessary to effect dehybridization of the sample and the probe.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 wherein the hybridization product is subject to an oscillating electrophoretic force.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 7 wherein the fluorescent label is placed in proximity to the initial denaturation site.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 13 wherein the electrophoretic force is in an amount less than is necessary to effect complete denaturation of the sample and the probe.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 14 where the fluorescent signal from a mismatched sample and probe exhibits a relatively greater response to the oscillating electrophoretic force relative to a matched hybridization product.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 wherein the probe is longer than a 20-mer.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 1 further including the step of averaging of the fluorescent signal.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
69 words
A method for hybridization analysis between a sample and a probe comprising the steps of: providing the sample and probe with a fluorescent label under hybridization conditions, forming a fluorescently labeled hybridization product, monitoring the fluorescence from the hybridization product, subjecting the hybridization product to varying electrophoretic force, and analyzing the fluorescent signal for variance as a function of said varying electrophoretic force to determine the fluorescence perturbation value.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
69 words
A method for hybridization analysis between a sample and a probe comprising the steps of: providing the sample and probe with a fluorescent label under hybridization conditions, forming a fluorescently labeled hybridization product, monitoring the fluorescence from the hybridization product, subjecting the hybridization product to varying electrophoretic force, and analyzing the fluorescent signal for variance as a function of said varying electrophoretic force to determine the fluorescence perturbation value.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the fluorescence perturbation value is measured for the onset value.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the fluorescence perturbation value is measured for its height.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the fluorescence perturbation value is measured for the slope.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the fluorescence is analyzed for the power level of the perturbation.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 further including the steps of: determining a second measure of hybridization between the sample and the probe, and combining the information obtained by the first analysis including the step of subjecting the hybridization product to the varying electrophoretic force in the second measure to provide a indication of hybridization.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 25 wherein the second measure of hybridization includes determination of the electronic melting point.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the fluorescent label is placed in proximity to the initial denaturation site.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the fluorescent label is intercalated adjacent a single based mismatch site.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
17 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claims 27 or 28 wherein the fluorescent label is ethidium bromide.
Claim 32
Independent Claim
16 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claims 27 or 28 wherein the fluorescent label is acridine.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the electrophoretic force is in an amount less than is necessary to effect dehybridization of the sample and the probe.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the hybridization product is subject to an oscillating electrophoretic force.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 25 wherein the fluorescent label is placed in proximity to the initial denaturation site.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 31 wherein the electrophoretic force is in an amount less than is necessary to effect complete denaturation of the sample and the probe.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 32 where the fluorescent signal from a mismatch sample and probe exhibits a relatively greater response to the oscillating electrophoretic force relative to a matched hybridization product.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 wherein the probe is longer than a 20-mer.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method for hybridization analysis of claim 20 further including the step of averaging of the fluorescent signal.