Patent US5754432A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5754432A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and method for estimating chip yield
Assignee: Texas Instruments Inc
•
Filing: 1995-12-07
•
Granted: 1998-05-19
•
Expires: 2015-12-07
Abstract
Abstract A high speed device and method for estimating the yield of semiconductor chips without requiring a large data storage area. The noise particles which adhere to a number of semiconductor chips are generated in a particle generating unit 12 and an identification number indicating the semiconductor chip on which the noise particles adhere is given. All the noise particles are driven in driving unit 13 on one mask stored in circuit storage unit 15. The mask pattern near the driven noise particle is checked and whether or not the noise particle causes a defect is checked in a defect detecting unit 16. Semiconductor chips with defects are detected in a semiconductor chip defect detecting unit 17 based on the semiconductor chip identification number of each noise particle. Then a computing unit 18 calculates the chip yield from the total number of semiconductor chips and the number of semiconductor chips without defects.
Inventors
- 👤 Takao Komatsuzaki
- 👤 Yoichi Miyai
- 👤 Hideyuki Fukuhara
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 13:43
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10P; H10P74/00; H10P74/23
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
162 words
A device for computing an estimate of nondefective chip yield during manufacture of semiconductor chips, comprising: an initializing circuit for receiving input parameters defining a layout of N semiconductor chips on a virtual wafer; a noise particle generator for generating simulated noise particles of a predetermined grain size distribution; a determining circuit for determining which noise particles adhere to the chips; a labeling circuit for assigning to each noise particle which adheres to one of the chips an identification number indicating the chip to which that noise particle adheres; a noise particle arranger for arranging all the noise particles on one corresponding chip mask having a pattern prescribed by a set of mask data; a defect detector for detecting for each noise particle on the mask whether it makes the mask's pattern defective; and a yield calculator, responsive to the noise particles and the defect detector, for tabulating a corresponding number of defective semiconductor chips and then computing the nondefective chip yield.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
162 words
A device for computing an estimate of nondefective chip yield during manufacture of semiconductor chips, comprising: an initializing circuit for receiving input parameters defining a layout of N semiconductor chips on a virtual wafer; a noise particle generator for generating simulated noise particles of a predetermined grain size distribution; a determining circuit for determining which noise particles adhere to the chips; a labeling circuit for assigning to each noise particle which adheres to one of the chips an identification number indicating the chip to which that noise particle adheres; a noise particle arranger for arranging all the noise particles on one corresponding chip mask having a pattern prescribed by a set of mask data; a defect detector for detecting for each noise particle on the mask whether it makes the mask's pattern defective; and a yield calculator, responsive to the noise particles and the defect detector, for tabulating a corresponding number of defective semiconductor chips and then computing the nondefective chip yield.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
The device of claim 1 wherein the defect detector reads only the mask data near the arranged noise particles for detecting whether the mask's pattern is made defective.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
141 words
A method for estimating nondefective chip yield during manufacture of semiconductor chips, comprising: predetermining a noise particle size distribution function representative of a selected semiconductor manufacturing site; providing circuit data and device parameters for a set of semiconductor chips; generating random simulated noise particles corresponding to the predetermined noise particle size distribution; assigning each noise particle an identification number indicating a chip within the set of semiconductor chips to which that noise particle is associated; disposing all the noise particles on one corresponding chip mask having a pattern prescribed by a set of mask data; detecting for each noise particle on the mask whether it makes the mask's pattern defective and generating a corresponding defect signal; and responsive to the noise particles and the defect signal, tabulating a corresponding number of defective semiconductor chips and then computing the nondefective chip yield.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
141 words
A method for estimating nondefective chip yield during manufacture of semiconductor chips, comprising: predetermining a noise particle size distribution function representative of a selected semiconductor manufacturing site; providing circuit data and device parameters for a set of semiconductor chips; generating random simulated noise particles corresponding to the predetermined noise particle size distribution; assigning each noise particle an identification number indicating a chip within the set of semiconductor chips to which that noise particle is associated; disposing all the noise particles on one corresponding chip mask having a pattern prescribed by a set of mask data; detecting for each noise particle on the mask whether it makes the mask's pattern defective and generating a corresponding defect signal; and responsive to the noise particles and the defect signal, tabulating a corresponding number of defective semiconductor chips and then computing the nondefective chip yield.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the step of predetermining further comprises: manufacturing a set of semiconductor test chips at the selected manufacturing site, the set of semiconductor chips having a set of defect density checking patterns; analyzing a yield of the set of semiconductor test chips to determine a defect rate corresponding to a noise particle size; and forming the noise particle size distribution function that corresponds to the defect rate of the set of semiconductor test chips.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 4, wherein the noise particle size distribution function includes a grain size dependency and a noise particle density.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 5, wherein each defect density pattern has a uniform spacing between conductive signals, and wherein the set of defect density patterns have a selected number of different spacings between conductive signals.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the step of forming the noise particle distribution function further comprises solving a yield equation representative of the defect density pattern of the set of semiconductor test chips.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 7, wherein the step of forming the noise particle distribution function further comprises recursively fitting the yield equation to the defect rate corresponding to noise particle size of the set of semiconductor test chips.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the set of semiconductor chips represent a proposed semiconductor chip that has not yet been manufactured.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3751647A
Cited
US3983479A
Cited
US4481664A
Cited
US4763289A
Cited
US4835466A
Cited
US5287290A
Cited
US5051938A
Cited
US5438527A
Cited
US5282140A
Cited
US5497381A
Cited
JPH07306848A
Cited
US5539652A
Cited
US5598341A
Cited
US5649169A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-05-18 | 2001-11-17 | 2002-05-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-11-17 | 2006-05-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-05-18 | 2009-11-17 | 2010-05-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |