US5381418A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Testable latch self checker
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1992-02-10
•
Granted: 1995-01-10
•
Expires: 2012-02-10
Abstract
Abstract The present invention operates by verifying correct latch operation in a digital circuit. After a value has been stored in a latch, electronic circuitry can verify that the value has been stored correctly. The electronic circuitry that performs this verification can be tested to insure that it is operating properly. Several latches can be wired into a scan chain and tested with relative ease. Operation of the present invention is illustrated by an enhanced master-slave latch system. In this system, two comparators are used. A first comparator is used to determine if the internal state of the master latch is identical to the signal which had been applied to this latch's data input terminal. A second comparator is used to determine if the state transfer between the master and slave latches occurs properly. Each comparator consists of an EXCLUSIVE-OR function. By placing known logic levels on each input terminal of the comparison circuitry, the output terminal of the comparison circuitry can be examined for an expected logic level to verify that it is operating properly. By placing several latches into a scan chain, a single latch can be loaded with data which will cause an expected signal to appear on the output terminal of this latch's comparison circuitry. This allows for simplified testing of a multiple latch system.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert K. Montoye
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 14:02
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/22; G06F11/2205; G06F11/2215; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/317; G01R31/3181; G01R31/3185; G01R31/318522; G01R31/318525; G11; G11C; G11C29/00; G11C29/04; G11C29/08; G11C29/12; G11C29/18; G11C29/30; G11C29/32
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
190 words
A method of simultaneously verifying correct operation of all of a plurality of storage devices in a single integrated circuit which includes comparison circuitry having a plurality of first and second input terminals and a plurality of respective output terminals, comprising the steps of: a) concurrently storing each of a plurality of input logic values in a respective one of said plurality of storage devices wherein all of said plurality of input logic values are stored simultaneously; b) concurrently comparing each of the plurality of stored logic values to a respective one of a plurality of reference values by placing known logic values on each input terminal of the comparison circuitry and examining the plurality of output terminals of the comparison circuitry for an expected logic level to verify that the comparison circuitry is operating properly, wherein each of said plurality of reference values is derived from a respective one of said plurality of input logic values, said reference values representing a plurality of logic values wherein all of said comparisons are performed simultaneously; c) indicating an error condition if any of said comparisons does not produce an expected result.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
190 words
A method of simultaneously verifying correct operation of all of a plurality of storage devices in a single integrated circuit which includes comparison circuitry having a plurality of first and second input terminals and a plurality of respective output terminals, comprising the steps of: a) concurrently storing each of a plurality of input logic values in a respective one of said plurality of storage devices wherein all of said plurality of input logic values are stored simultaneously; b) concurrently comparing each of the plurality of stored logic values to a respective one of a plurality of reference values by placing known logic values on each input terminal of the comparison circuitry and examining the plurality of output terminals of the comparison circuitry for an expected logic level to verify that the comparison circuitry is operating properly, wherein each of said plurality of reference values is derived from a respective one of said plurality of input logic values, said reference values representing a plurality of logic values wherein all of said comparisons are performed simultaneously; c) indicating an error condition if any of said comparisons does not produce an expected result.
Claim 3
Independent Claim
141 words
A method of verifying operation of an N-stage storage device, where N is greater than 1, comprising the steps of: a) storing a logic value in a stage M of the N-stage storage device; b) transferring the logic value in stage M to a stage Q; said stage Q being coupled to the stage M; c) directly comparing an output signal from stage M with an output signal from stage Q, wherein said comparison is performed using a comparator having a first input terminal and a second input terminal; d) indicating an error condition if the comparison does not produce an expected result; e) applying identical input signals to said first input terminal and said second input terminal of said comparator; and f) indicating by said comparator that said input signals are identical, thus indicating that said comparator is operating properly.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
141 words
A method of verifying operation of an N-stage storage device, where N is greater than 1, comprising the steps of: a) storing a logic value in a stage M of the N-stage storage device; b) transferring the logic value in stage M to a stage Q; said stage Q being coupled to the stage M; c) directly comparing an output signal from stage M with an output signal from stage Q, wherein said comparison is performed using a comparator having a first input terminal and a second input terminal; d) indicating an error condition if the comparison does not produce an expected result; e) applying identical input signals to said first input terminal and said second input terminal of said comparator; and f) indicating by said comparator that said input signals are identical, thus indicating that said comparator is operating properly.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the logic value is stored in the stages M and Q responsive to a clock signal.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the step c) employs an EXCLUSIVE-OR function.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
75 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the N-stage storage device includes a terminal for applying a clock signal and the step c) includes the steps of: loading said output signal from stage M and said output signal from stage 0 into the comparator as a result of the clock signal being in a first state; and conditioning the comparator to perform said comparison as a result of the clock signal being in a second state.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 5, wherein in step a) data is stored in the N-stage storage device by means responsive to a clock signal.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
196 words
A system for verifying correct operation of a plurality of storage devices in an electronic logic circuit, said system including comparison circuitry, said system comprising: means for concurrently storing a plurality of input logic values in the plurality of storage devices; comparison means for: a) concurrently performing a plurality of comparisons between each of the plurality of stored logic values and a corresponding one of a plurality of reference values, wherein each of said plurality of reference values is derived from the plurality of input logic values, each of said plurality of reference values represents a respective one of a plurality of logic values; and b) for indicating an error condition if at least one of the plurality of comparisons does not produce a predetermined expected result on an output terminal of the comparison circuitry; means for placing known logic levels on each input terminal of the comparison circuitry; means for examining the output terminal of the comparison circuitry for an expected logic value and for signalling an error condition if the expected value is not found; and operational verification means for verifying operation of said comparison means independent of said plurality of stored logic values.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
196 words
A system for verifying correct operation of a plurality of storage devices in an electronic logic circuit, said system including comparison circuitry, said system comprising: means for concurrently storing a plurality of input logic values in the plurality of storage devices; comparison means for: a) concurrently performing a plurality of comparisons between each of the plurality of stored logic values and a corresponding one of a plurality of reference values, wherein each of said plurality of reference values is derived from the plurality of input logic values, each of said plurality of reference values represents a respective one of a plurality of logic values; and b) for indicating an error condition if at least one of the plurality of comparisons does not produce a predetermined expected result on an output terminal of the comparison circuitry; means for placing known logic levels on each input terminal of the comparison circuitry; means for examining the output terminal of the comparison circuitry for an expected logic value and for signalling an error condition if the expected value is not found; and operational verification means for verifying operation of said comparison means independent of said plurality of stored logic values.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3719929A
Cited
US3988670A
Cited
US4326290A
Cited
US4541066A
Cited
US4541090A
Cited
US4675597A
Cited
US4493077A
Cited
US4513418A
Cited
US4667330A
Cited
US4554664A
Cited
US4744061A
Cited
US4654849A
Cited
US4654849B1
Cited
US4811294A
Cited
US4788684A
Cited
US4905142A
Cited
US4788492A
Cited
US4750181A
Cited
US4912710A
Cited
US5075892A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-01-09 | 1998-07-11 | 1999-01-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-01-09 | 2002-07-11 | 2003-01-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-01-09 | 2006-07-11 | 2007-01-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |