Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 48
Claim 1
Independent Claim
187 words
A computer-implemented method for creating a focus-exposure model of a lithography process, comprising: selecting a set of process conditions within a predetermined process window of a lithography process, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within the process window, each process condition being an exposure value and a defocus value; selecting a model of the lithography process, the model including an optical model module, the model having a set of model parameters including focus, exposure, and a set of fitting parameters having variable values; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using the model to produce simulated results, wherein values of the focus and exposure parameters are varied to correspond to the set of process conditions and the fitting parameter values are held constant; and calibrating, using the computer, the model by comparing the simulated results with actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce a single focus-exposure model capable of simulating the lithography process at all possible process conditions within the predetermined process window.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
187 words
A computer-implemented method for creating a focus-exposure model of a lithography process, comprising: selecting a set of process conditions within a predetermined process window of a lithography process, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within the process window, each process condition being an exposure value and a defocus value; selecting a model of the lithography process, the model including an optical model module, the model having a set of model parameters including focus, exposure, and a set of fitting parameters having variable values; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using the model to produce simulated results, wherein values of the focus and exposure parameters are varied to correspond to the set of process conditions and the fitting parameter values are held constant; and calibrating, using the computer, the model by comparing the simulated results with actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce a single focus-exposure model capable of simulating the lithography process at all possible process conditions within the predetermined process window.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the focus-exposure model is used to simulate the lithography process at a process condition within the predetermined process window that is not one of the set of process conditions.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of model parameters further includes one or more first principle parameters in addition to focus and exposure.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 3 , wherein the one or more first principle parameters includes one or more of illumination source, numerical aperture, and optical aberrations.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the model of the lithography process further includes a resist model module.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the model of the lithography process further includes a mask model module.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of process conditions includes only process conditions at nominal exposure and varying values of focus.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of process conditions includes only nominal condition, a positive defocus condition at nominal exposure condition, and a negative defocus condition at nominal exposure condition.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
66 words
The method of claim 1 , further comprising: selecting a set of test patterns for a test mask, wherein the set of test patterns covers a full range of proximity interactions that are characteristic of the lithography process; printing the set of test patterns on a wafer to form a set of test structures; and using the set of test structures to produce the actual results.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the simulated results and the actual results are critical dimension measurements.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein calibrating the model includes minimizing a cost function that is calculated based on the comparison of the simulated results with the actual results.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 11 , wherein the cost function includes a root-mean-square (RMS) distance between the simulated results and the actual results.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
164 words
A computer-implemented method for generating a focus-exposure model of a lithography process capable of simulating the lithography process over an entire process window, comprising: obtaining measurements of a set of test structures printed on a wafer using the lithography process at each of a set of process conditions, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within a process window in an exposure-defocus space; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using a model of the lithography process to produce simulated results, the model including model parameters including focus, exposure, and a set of fitting parameters having variable values; determining optimum values of the fitting parameters that produce simulated results that are a best fit with the measurements of the set of test structures at all of the set of process conditions; and defining, using the computer, the focus-exposure model as the model having the optimum values of the fitting parameters.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
164 words
A computer-implemented method for generating a focus-exposure model of a lithography process capable of simulating the lithography process over an entire process window, comprising: obtaining measurements of a set of test structures printed on a wafer using the lithography process at each of a set of process conditions, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within a process window in an exposure-defocus space; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using a model of the lithography process to produce simulated results, the model including model parameters including focus, exposure, and a set of fitting parameters having variable values; determining optimum values of the fitting parameters that produce simulated results that are a best fit with the measurements of the set of test structures at all of the set of process conditions; and defining, using the computer, the focus-exposure model as the model having the optimum values of the fitting parameters.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the focus-exposure model is used to simulate the lithography process at a process condition within the process window that is not one of the set of process conditions by applying focus and exposure values corresponding to the process condition within the process window to the focus-exposure model in accordance with first principles without changing the optimum values of the fitting parameters.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the model parameters include one or more first principle parameters in addition to focus and exposure.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 15 , wherein the one or more first principle parameters includes one or more of illumination source, numerical aperture, and optical aberrations.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the model of the lithography process includes a resist model module.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the model of the lithography process includes a mask model module.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the set of process conditions include only process conditions at nominal exposure and varying values of focus.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the set of process conditions include only nominal condition, a positive defocus condition at nominal exposure condition, and a negative defocus condition at nominal exposure condition.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 13 , further comprising: selecting a set of test patterns for a test mask, wherein the set of test patterns covers a full range of proximity interactions that are characteristic of the lithography process; and printing the set of test patterns on the wafer to produce the set of test structures.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein the measurements of the set of test structures and the simulated results are critical dimension measurements.
Claim 25
Independent Claim
232 words
A system for generating a single process window model for predicting the capability of a lithography process, comprising: a storage area for storing information; an input device; an output device; physical model information stored in the storage area; and a model calibration module; the storage area being in communication with the model calibration module such that selected physical model information can be accessed by the model calibration module; the input device being in communication with the model calibration module such that process window definition information defining a process window can be made available to the model calibration module and such that discrete measurement information obtained from measurements of a wafer under different test conditions in the defined process window can be accessed by the model calibration module, and the model calibration module is configured to generate a single process window model by using the process window definition information and the discrete measurement information to calibrate the selected physical model information such that the performance of a lithography process over the defined process window can be described with two continuously adjustable optical parameters, wherein generating the single process window model includes comparing the discrete measurement information with simulated measurements, the simulated measurements produced by simulating the lithography process using the selected physical model information by varying the two continuously adjustable optical parameters while holding all other parameters in the physical model information constant.
Claim 26
Independent Claim
232 words
A system for generating a single process window model for predicting the capability of a lithography process, comprising: a storage area for storing information; an input device; an output device; physical model information stored in the storage area; and a model calibration module; the storage area being in communication with the model calibration module such that selected physical model information can be accessed by the model calibration module; the input device being in communication with the model calibration module such that process window definition information defining a process window can be made available to the model calibration module and such that discrete measurement information obtained from measurements of a wafer under different test conditions in the defined process window can be accessed by the model calibration module, and the model calibration module is configured to generate a single process window model by using the process window definition information and the discrete measurement information to calibrate the selected physical model information such that the performance of a lithography process over the defined process window can be described with two continuously adjustable optical parameters, wherein generating the single process window model includes comparing the discrete measurement information with simulated measurements, the simulated measurements produced by simulating the lithography process using the selected physical model information by varying the two continuously adjustable optical parameters while holding all other parameters in the physical model information constant.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
17 words
The system of claim 23 , wherein the two continuously adjustable optical parameters are focus and exposure.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system of claim 24 , wherein the simulated measurements are produced using values of the two continuously adjustable optical parameters only at nominal exposure and varying values of focus.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
42 words
The system of claim 24 , wherein the simulated measurements are produced using values of the two continuously adjustable optical parameters only at nominal condition, a positive defocus condition at nominal exposure condition, and a negative defocus condition at nominal exposure condition.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
23 words
The system of claim 23 , wherein the physical model information includes one or more of illumination source, numerical aperture, and optical aberrations.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 23 , wherein the physical model information includes resist model information.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 23 , wherein the physical model information includes mask model information.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
183 words
A computer-implemented method for creating a model of a lithography process, comprising: selecting a set of process conditions within a predetermined process window of a lithography process, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within the process window, each process condition being a value for at least one parameter; selecting a model of the lithography process, the model having a set of model parameters including the at least one parameter of the process condition and a set of fitting parameters; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using the model to produce simulated results, wherein the value of the at least one parameter is varied to correspond to the set of process conditions while the fitting parameter values are held constant; and calibrating, using the computer, the model by comparing the simulated results with actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce a single model capable of simulating the lithography process at all possible process conditions within the predetermined process window.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
183 words
A computer-implemented method for creating a model of a lithography process, comprising: selecting a set of process conditions within a predetermined process window of a lithography process, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within the process window, each process condition being a value for at least one parameter; selecting a model of the lithography process, the model having a set of model parameters including the at least one parameter of the process condition and a set of fitting parameters; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using the model to produce simulated results, wherein the value of the at least one parameter is varied to correspond to the set of process conditions while the fitting parameter values are held constant; and calibrating, using the computer, the model by comparing the simulated results with actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce a single model capable of simulating the lithography process at all possible process conditions within the predetermined process window.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein the at least one parameter is an optical parameter.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 31 , wherein the optical parameter is focus.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 31 , wherein the optical parameter is a numerical aperture of a lithography exposure tool.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein the at least one parameter is a resist parameter.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein the at least one parameter includes an optical parameter and a resist parameter.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
197 words
A computer-implemented method for creating a single model of a lithography process for use at nominal condition, comprising: selecting a set of process conditions within a predetermined process window of a lithography process, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within the predetermined process window, the set of process conditions including nominal condition, each process condition being a value for at least one parameter; selecting a model of the lithography process having model parameters including the at least one parameter of the process condition and a set of fining parameters; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using the model to produce simulated results, wherein the value of the at least one parameter is varied to correspond to the set of process conditions while the fitting parameter values are held constant; and calibrating, using the computer, the model by minimizing a total difference measure between the simulated results and actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce a single model, wherein the single model is used to model the lithography process at the nominal condition.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
197 words
A computer-implemented method for creating a single model of a lithography process for use at nominal condition, comprising: selecting a set of process conditions within a predetermined process window of a lithography process, the set of process conditions being a subset of all possible process conditions within the predetermined process window, the set of process conditions including nominal condition, each process condition being a value for at least one parameter; selecting a model of the lithography process having model parameters including the at least one parameter of the process condition and a set of fining parameters; simulating, using the computer, the lithography process at each of the set of process conditions using the model to produce simulated results, wherein the value of the at least one parameter is varied to correspond to the set of process conditions while the fitting parameter values are held constant; and calibrating, using the computer, the model by minimizing a total difference measure between the simulated results and actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce a single model, wherein the single model is used to model the lithography process at the nominal condition.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the at least one parameter is focus.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the at least one parameter includes one or more of illumination source, numerical aperture, and optical aberrations.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 36 , further comprising: selecting a set of test patterns for a test mask; printing the set of test patterns on a wafer to form a set of test structures; and using the set of test structures to produce the actual results.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
110 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein calibrating the model further comprises: comparing the simulated results with actual results of the lithography process at all of the set of process conditions to produce the total difference measure between the simulated results and the actual results; modifying values of the fining parameters and generating additional simulated results at the set of process conditions to identify optimum fitting parameter values such that the total difference measure between the actual results and simulated results produced using the optimum fitting parameter values is minimized or is below a predetermined threshold; and defining the single model as the model including the optimum fitting parameter values.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the total difference measure is a root mean square difference.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the set of process conditions includes only process conditions at nominal exposure and varying values of focus.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 36 , wherein the set of process conditions includes only nominal condition, a positive defocus condition at nominal exposure condition, and a negative defocus condition at nominal exposure condition.