Patent US7016017B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US7016017B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Lithographic apparatus and method for optimizing an illumination source using isofocal compensation

Assignee: ASML Netherlands BV
•
Filing: 2003-11-20
•
Granted: 2006-03-21
•
Expires: 2023-11-20
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method for optimizing the illumination conditions of a lithographic apparatus by computer simulation using isofocal compensation, the lithographic apparatus including an illuminator, a projection system and a mask having at least one pattern to be printed on a substrate. This method includes defining a lithographic pattern to be printed on the substrate, selecting a simulation model, selecting a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illuminator, calculating separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using the simulation model, calculating a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus and adjusting an illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric.

Inventors

  • 👤 Steven George Hansen

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 10:50
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70491; G03F7/705; G03F7/70058; G03F7/70091; G03F7/701; G03F7/70108

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim 127 words
A method for optimizing an illumination condition of a lithographic apparatus by computer simulation using isofocal compensation, the lithographic apparatus comprising an illuminator configured to provide an illumination arrangement, a projection system and a mask having at least one pattern to be printed on a substrate, the method comprising: defining a lithographic pattern to be printed on the substrate; selecting a simulation model; selecting a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illuminator; calculating separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using the simulation model; calculating a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus; and adjusting an illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 127 words
A method for optimizing an illumination condition of a lithographic apparatus by computer simulation using isofocal compensation, the lithographic apparatus comprising an illuminator configured to provide an illumination arrangement, a projection system and a mask having at least one pattern to be printed on a substrate, the method comprising: defining a lithographic pattern to be printed on the substrate; selecting a simulation model; selecting a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illuminator; calculating separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using the simulation model; calculating a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus; and adjusting an illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 59 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein calculating the metric comprises: applying a defocus; calculating separate defocus responses for individual source points at the defocus, each of the defocus responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using the simulation model; and comparing the separate responses with the separate defocus responses for individual source points.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 19 words
A method according to claim 2 , wherein the comparing comprises determining separate metric responses for individual source points.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 34 words
A method according to claim 3 , wherein the separate metric responses correspond either to an augmentation of the value of the defocus response or a diminution of the value of the defocus response.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 24 words
A method according to claim 3 , wherein the determining comprises subtracting the separate defocus responses from the separate responses for individual source points.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 23 words
A method according to claim 3 , wherein the adjusting comprises mapping the metric responses as a function of individual source point positions.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 23 words
A method according to claim 4 , wherein the adjusting comprises selecting an illumination arrangement capturing source points having opposite metric response behaviors.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 19 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein the defocus is within a range from 0.02 to 0.4 μm.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 34 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein selecting a simulation model comprises selecting one of a full resist model, an aerial image model, a lumped parameter model and a variable threshold resist model.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 21 words
A method according to claim 9 , wherein the resist model is a calibrated model capable of adequately predicting experimental results.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 34 words
A method according to claim 9 , wherein the resist model includes defining a resist model taking into account at least one of vector effects, non-zero diffusion of active species, and finite dissolution contrast.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 24 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein the separate responses comprise one of a critical dimension of the pattern and an intensity threshold.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 30 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein the adjusting comprises selecting an illumination arrangement so that the variation of the separate responses is substantially equal to zero through defocus.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 36 words
A method according to claim 1 , further comprising calculating other separate responses for individual source points, each of the other responses representing a result of a single or series of simulation using the simulation model.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 23 words
A method according to claim 14 , wherein the adjusting comprises adjusting an illumination arrangement based on analysis of the other separate responses.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 43 words
A method according to claim 14 , wherein the other responses comprise one of exposure latitude, depth of focus, E1:1, dense to isolated features bias, arbitrary feature biases, sidelobe printing, film loss, sidewall angle, mask error enhancement factor, linear resolution and absolute resolution.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method according to claim 14 , further comprising mapping the other separate responses as a function of individual source point positions.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 24 words
A method according to claim 1 , further comprising mapping the variation of the separate responses as a function of individual source points positions.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 25 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein a spacing of the source point in the grid is within a range from 0.01 to 0.2.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein adjusting the illumination arrangement includes adjusting illumination arrangement by varying a position of an axicon/zoom module relative to a pyramidal prism, a position of a diffractive optical element, a position of an aperture blade, or by adjusting a programmable mirror array.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 18 words
A method according to claim 1 , wherein adjusting the illumination arrangement includes selecting a multipole illuminator arrangement.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 52 words
A device manufacturing method comprising: providing a mask; and projecting a patterned beam of radiation onto a target portion of a layer of radiation-sensitive material on a substrate, wherein, prior to impinging the mask, a cross-sectional intensity distribution in the projection beam is optimized using a method according to claim 1 .
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 16 words
A method according to claim 4 , wherein the adjusting comprises weighing the individual source points.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 175 words
A lithographic projection apparatus comprising: an illumination system to provide a projection beam of radiation a support structure to support patterning structure which can be used to pattern the projection beam according to a desired pattern; a substrate table to hold a substrate; a projection system to project the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate; a processor to define a lithographic pattern to be printed on the substrate, to select a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illumination system, to calculate separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using a simulation model, to calculate a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus; and to calculate an optimized illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric; and a selectably variable beam controller that is adapted to modify a cross-sectional intensity distribution in the projection beam exiting the illumination system in accordance with the optimized illumination arrangement calculated by the processor.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 175 words
A lithographic projection apparatus comprising: an illumination system to provide a projection beam of radiation a support structure to support patterning structure which can be used to pattern the projection beam according to a desired pattern; a substrate table to hold a substrate; a projection system to project the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate; a processor to define a lithographic pattern to be printed on the substrate, to select a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illumination system, to calculate separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using a simulation model, to calculate a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus; and to calculate an optimized illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric; and a selectably variable beam controller that is adapted to modify a cross-sectional intensity distribution in the projection beam exiting the illumination system in accordance with the optimized illumination arrangement calculated by the processor.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 103 words
A machine readable medium encoded with machine executable instructions for optimizing an illumination condition of an illuminator using isofocal compensation according to a method comprising: defining a lithographic pattern to be printed on a substrate; selecting a simulation model; selecting a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illuminator; calculating separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using the simulation model; calculating a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus; and adjusting an illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 103 words
A machine readable medium encoded with machine executable instructions for optimizing an illumination condition of an illuminator using isofocal compensation according to a method comprising: defining a lithographic pattern to be printed on a substrate; selecting a simulation model; selecting a grid of source points in a pupil plane of the illuminator; calculating separate responses for individual source points, each of the responses representing a result of a single or series of simulations using the simulation model; calculating a metric representing variation of the separate responses for individual source points with defocus; and adjusting an illumination arrangement based on analysis of the metric.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2009-03-20 2009-09-19 2010-03-21 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2013-03-20 2013-09-19 2014-03-21 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2017-03-20 2017-09-19 2018-03-21 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag