Patent US6078390A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6078390A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Scanning system and method of operation for automatically setting detection sensitivity
Assignee: Revvity Health Sciences Inc
•
Filing: 1998-05-04
•
Granted: 2000-06-20
•
Expires: 2018-05-04
Abstract
Abstract An optical scanning system uses a low-resolution scanning operation, to automatically adjust the sensitivity of the system. The system performs a low-resolution scanning operation by scanning a line, automatically and iteratively setting the levels of excitation signal power and detector gain, skipping a plurality of lines and scanning a next line, adjusting the levels as appropriate, skipping a plurality of lines and scanning a next line, and so forth. After the system sensitivities have been set, the calibrated system then scans all the lines of the sample to collect data. The calibrated system thus scans for the first time the lines that were skipped during the low resolution scanning operation.
Inventors
- 👤 Hans Bengtsson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 20:49
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/62; G01N21/63; G01N21/64; G01N21/645; G01N21/6452
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 38
Claim 1
Independent Claim
173 words
A method of setting the fluorescence sensitivity of an optical scanning system, the method including the steps of: A. producing an excitation signal with a predetermined power level; B. scanning a first scan line of a predetermined calibration area of a sample using the excitation signal; C. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; D. if the signals are saturated reducing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; E. repeating steps B-D until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; F. scanning a next scan line of the calibration area; G. determining if signals corresponding to N adjacent pixels in the next scan line are saturated; H. if the signals are saturated reducing the excitation signal power by the predetermined factor; I. repeating steps G-H until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; and J. repeating steps F-I until a last scan line in the calibration area is scanned.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
173 words
A method of setting the fluorescence sensitivity of an optical scanning system, the method including the steps of: A. producing an excitation signal with a predetermined power level; B. scanning a first scan line of a predetermined calibration area of a sample using the excitation signal; C. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; D. if the signals are saturated reducing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; E. repeating steps B-D until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; F. scanning a next scan line of the calibration area; G. determining if signals corresponding to N adjacent pixels in the next scan line are saturated; H. if the signals are saturated reducing the excitation signal power by the predetermined factor; I. repeating steps G-H until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; and J. repeating steps F-I until a last scan line in the calibration area is scanned.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of scanning a next scan line includes skipping a plurality of lines between scan lines.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 1 further including the steps of: K. adjusting detector gain by a predetermined gain factor when the excitation signal power is reduced to a minimum and the signals associated with N pixels are saturated; and L. when the detector gain is adjusted increasing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 1 further including the steps of: K. determining an average signal value for the signals associated with the M brightest pixels in the calibration area; L. producing an excitation signal that has a power level that will produce for the M brightest pixels associated signals that have a predetermined average signal value.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the step of skipping a plurality of lines includes skipping a number of lines that produces a spacing between scan lines that is at least twice as wide as the scan line.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the step of skipping a plurality of lines includes selecting scan lines that are spaced no further than one half of the diameter or width of a sample element.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of repeating steps A-J using a next excitation signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 7 further including the step of turning the excitation signal and the next excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 3 further including the step of repeating steps A-L using a next excitation signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 9 further including the step of turning the excitation signal and the next excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in the step of determining if signals are saturated includes selecting N consecutively acquired pixels.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of determining an average value selects M consecutively acquired pixels.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of turning the excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
166 words
A method of setting the fluorescence sensitivity of an optical scanning system, the method including the steps of: A. setting detector gain at predetermined maximum level; B. scanning a first scan line of a predetermined calibration area of a sample using an excitation signal; C. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; D. if the signals are saturated decreasing the detector gain by a predetermined factor; E. repeating steps B-D until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; F. scanning a next line of the calibration area; G. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; H. if the signals are saturated decreasing the detector gain by a predetermined factor; I. repeating steps G-H until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; and repeating steps F-I until a last scan line in the calibration area is scanned.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
166 words
A method of setting the fluorescence sensitivity of an optical scanning system, the method including the steps of: A. setting detector gain at predetermined maximum level; B. scanning a first scan line of a predetermined calibration area of a sample using an excitation signal; C. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; D. if the signals are saturated decreasing the detector gain by a predetermined factor; E. repeating steps B-D until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; F. scanning a next line of the calibration area; G. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; H. if the signals are saturated decreasing the detector gain by a predetermined factor; I. repeating steps G-H until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; and repeating steps F-I until a last scan line in the calibration area is scanned.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method of claim 14 further including the steps of: J. determining an average signal value for the signals associated with the M brightest pixels in the calibration area; and K. adjusting a level of attenuation to produce an excitation signal that will produce for the M brightest pixels associated signals that have a predetermined average value.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 14 further including, in the step of scanning a next scan line, skipping a plurality of lines between scan lines.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 16 wherein the step of skipping a plurality of lines includes skipping a number of lines that produces a spacing between scan lines that is at least twice as wide as the scan line.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 16 wherein the step of skipping a plurality of lines includes selecting scan lines that are spaced no further than one half of the diameter or width of a sample element.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 14 further including the step of repeating steps A-J using a next excitation signal.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 19 further including the step of turning the excitation signal and the next excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 15 further including the step of repeating steps A-L using a next excitation signal.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 21 further including the step of turning the excitation signal and the next excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 14 wherein in the step of determining if signals are saturated includes selecting N consecutively acquired pixels.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the step of determining an average value selects M adjacent pixels.
Claim 27
Independent Claim
275 words
A method of setting the fluorescence sensitivity of an optical scanning system, the method including the steps of: A. producing an excitation signal at a predetermined power level and setting detector gain at predetermined maximum level; B. scanning a first scan line of a predetermined calibration area of a sample using the excitation signal; C. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; D. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is not at a predetermined minimum, reducing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; E. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is at a predetermined minimum, decreasing a detector gain by a predetermined factor and increasing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; F. repeating steps B-E until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; G. skipping a plurality of lines and scanning a next line of the calibration area; H. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; I. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is not at a predetermined minimum, reducing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; J. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is at a predetermined minimum, decreasing the detector gain by a predetermined factor and increasing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; K. repeating steps H-J until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; and L. repeating steps G-K until a last scan line in the calibration area is scanned.
Claim 28
Independent Claim
275 words
A method of setting the fluorescence sensitivity of an optical scanning system, the method including the steps of: A. producing an excitation signal at a predetermined power level and setting detector gain at predetermined maximum level; B. scanning a first scan line of a predetermined calibration area of a sample using the excitation signal; C. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; D. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is not at a predetermined minimum, reducing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; E. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is at a predetermined minimum, decreasing a detector gain by a predetermined factor and increasing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; F. repeating steps B-E until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the first scan line are saturated; G. skipping a plurality of lines and scanning a next line of the calibration area; H. determining if signals corresponding to N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; I. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is not at a predetermined minimum, reducing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; J. if the signals are saturated and the excitation signal power is at a predetermined minimum, decreasing the detector gain by a predetermined factor and increasing the excitation signal power by a predetermined factor; K. repeating steps H-J until the signals associated with fewer than N pixels in the next scan line are saturated; and L. repeating steps G-K until a last scan line in the calibration area is scanned.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 25 further including the steps of: M. determining an average signal value for the signals associated with the M brightest pixels in the calibration area; and N. producing an excitation signal has a power level that will produce for the M brightest adjacent pixels associated signals that have a predetermined average value.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 25 wherein the step of skipping a plurality of lines includes skipping a number of lines that produces a spacing between scan lines that is at least twice as wide as the scan line.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 25 wherein the step of skipping a plurality of lines includes selecting scan lines that are spaced no further than one half of the diameter or width of a sample element.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 25 further including the step of repeating steps A-L using a next excitation signal.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 26 further including the step of repeating steps A-N using a next excitation signal.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 25 further including turning the excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 29 further including the step of turning the excitation signal and the next excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 30 further including the step of turning the excitation signal and the next excitation signal off for selected portions of a scan line.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 25 wherein in the step of determining if signals are saturated includes selecting N consecutively acquired pixels.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 26 wherein the step of determining an average value selects M consecutively acquired pixels.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4482252A
Cited
US4489236A
Cited
US4758727A
Cited
US4877966A
Cited
US4833332A
Cited
US5053626A
Cited
US5194916A
Cited
US5212538A
Cited
US5239171A
Cited
US5296703A
Cited
US5302824A
Cited
US5600147A
Cited
US5426306A
Cited
US5631734A
Cited
US5437840A
Cited
US5538850A
Cited
US5459325A
Cited
US5689110A
Cited
US5672880A
Cited
US5633724A
Cited
US5646411A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-06-20 | 2003-12-20 | 2004-06-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | 2008-06-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-06-20 | 2011-12-20 | 2012-06-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |