Patent US5497076A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5497076A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Determination of failure criteria based upon grain boundary electromigration in metal alloy films
Assignee: LSI Corp
•
Filing: 1993-10-25
•
Granted: 1996-03-05
•
Expires: 2013-10-25
Abstract
Abstract A critical temperature rise ΔR is selected at a value for which electromigration of atoms in the metal conductive line deposited on a semiconductive substrate is predominantly a grain boundary electromigration. Selection of the critical resistance rise is made by performing a number of tests on different ones of a plurality of substantially identical bow tie conductive lines formed of alternating narrow and wide sections interconnected by tapering line sections. Temperatures for the selection of the critical resistance rise are calculated rather than measured so as to more accurately reflect the relatively high local temperature at the site of a void in the metallic conductive line. Plot of a plurality of line widths against temperature for a given current density enables selection of a minimum line width or maximum void depth that will occur in a condition of predominantly grain boundary electromigration and before a large amount of bulk electromigration occurs. Utilizing empirically selected line widths (or void depth) and calculated temperatures, a critical value of ΔR resistance rise is calculated and structure of lines stressed to critical values of ΔR is visually observed by a scanning electron microscope. The lines are electrically stressed at different values of current density until the selected critical value of resistance rise occurs and elapsed time for such occurrence recorded. The results are used to solve for Ea, A and N in Black's equation, MTTF=A(J) -N exp (Ea/KT), also utilizing calculated temperature. Using a highest expected electrical current density and highest expected temperature with the calculated values of Ea, A and N, Black's equation is then solved for an expected mean time to failure (MTTF).
Inventors
- 👤 Arthur T. C. Kuo
- 👤 Ratan Choudhury
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 23:08
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/2851; G01R31/2855; G01R31/2856; G01R31/2858; G01R31/282; G01R31/2831
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
258 words
A method for evaluating electromigration induced failure of a thin film conductor that is typical of thin film conductors incorporated in microcircuitry and other integrated circuits, wherein the conductor is subject to failure due to grain boundary and bulk electromigration of atoms in said conductor when the conductor is stressed by electric current and temperature, said method comprising the steps of: forming a plurality of conductive test patterns on a semiconductor substrate, said conductive test patterns exhibiting a resistance rise ΔR when an electric current flows therein, selecting a critical value ΔR c of resistance rise that results from electromigration that is predominantly grain boundary electromigration, electrically stressing said conductive test patterns at a plurality of current densities by application of electric current thereto, measuring resistance rise of said patterns as they are stressed, recording time elapsed until said measured resistance rise is at said critical value ΔR c , employing said recorded elapsed time to determine values of activation energy Ea, a proportionally constant A, and a current density exponent N in a first equation MTTF=A(J) -N exp (Ea/KT), where MTTF is elapsed time, K is the Boltzmann constant, and T is temperature of said conductive test patterns, and solving said equation for MMTF for a predetermined current density and a temperature using said determined values of Ea, A and N; wherein said step of selecting a critical value of ΔR for which temperature of the electrically stressed conductive test patterns is not greater than a temperature at which bulk electromigration predominates in said conductive test patterns.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
258 words
A method for evaluating electromigration induced failure of a thin film conductor that is typical of thin film conductors incorporated in microcircuitry and other integrated circuits, wherein the conductor is subject to failure due to grain boundary and bulk electromigration of atoms in said conductor when the conductor is stressed by electric current and temperature, said method comprising the steps of: forming a plurality of conductive test patterns on a semiconductor substrate, said conductive test patterns exhibiting a resistance rise ΔR when an electric current flows therein, selecting a critical value ΔR c of resistance rise that results from electromigration that is predominantly grain boundary electromigration, electrically stressing said conductive test patterns at a plurality of current densities by application of electric current thereto, measuring resistance rise of said patterns as they are stressed, recording time elapsed until said measured resistance rise is at said critical value ΔR c , employing said recorded elapsed time to determine values of activation energy Ea, a proportionally constant A, and a current density exponent N in a first equation MTTF=A(J) -N exp (Ea/KT), where MTTF is elapsed time, K is the Boltzmann constant, and T is temperature of said conductive test patterns, and solving said equation for MMTF for a predetermined current density and a temperature using said determined values of Ea, A and N; wherein said step of selecting a critical value of ΔR for which temperature of the electrically stressed conductive test patterns is not greater than a temperature at which bulk electromigration predominates in said conductive test patterns.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of selecting a critical value of ΔR comprises selecting a value of ΔR for which the temperature of the electrically stressed conductor test patterns is not greater than 460° C.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of selecting a critical value of ΔR c comprises the steps of calculating a curve of variation of temperature with change of width of a line of the conductive test patterns, employing said curve to determine line crack depth at a selected maximum temperature and calculating the critical resistance rise ΔR c from said line crack depth and a nominal line width.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
96 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of selecting the critical resistance rise ΔR c includes the step of calculating resistance R v of a line of said conductive test pattern in accordance with the equation: R.sub.v =-(2R.sub.o (1+T.sub.CR (T-T.sub.o)/h) ln (1-(L/W) where R o is resistivity of the line at room temperature, h is line thickness, L is line crack depth, W is nominal width of the line before stressing, T-T o is local temperature change, T is line temperature for an electrically stressed line and T o is temperature of an unstressed line.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the temperature T of said first equation (MTTF=A(J) -N exp (Ea/KT)) is calculated as T M from a second equation: ##EQU2## and a third equation: Σ[K.sub.I /tt.sub.I (1+0.88t.sub.I /W)]=K.sub.I /tt.sub.t (1+0.88t.sub.t /w)+K.sub.I /tt.sub.b (1+0.88t.sub.b /w)+2×0.88K.sub.I /tw)] where Ta=room temperature, J=current density, R o =resistivity of metal at 0° C., K I =thermal conductivity of the insulator, t=metal thickness, t I , t t and t b =insulator thickness (top and bottom), and w=metal width.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
77 words
The method of claim 5 including the steps of empirically determining K I by experimentally defining a curve of variation of temperature of an electrically stressed line with magnitude of current applied to stress the line, choosing a plurality of different assumed values of K I for each said assumed value of K I using the equation: ##EQU3## to calculate a curve of variation of temperature with density of magnitude of current applied to stress the line.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 5 including the steps of empirically determining K I by experimentally defining a curve of variation of temperature of an electrically stressed line with magnitude of current applied to stress the line, and empirically selecting a value of K i that fits said curve.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of forming a plurality of test patterns comprises forming each said pattern with a plurality of relatively wider sections alternating with a plurality of narrower sections and a plurality of tapered width sections each positioned between a narrower and wider section.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said conductive test patterns are formed of an alloy of aluminum and wherein said critical temperature rise is not greater than two percent.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said conductive test patterns are formed of an alloy of aluminum and wherein said critical temperature rise is not greater than 0.5%.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3474530A
Cited
US4213087A
Cited
US4483629A
Cited
US4652812A
Cited
US4816895A
Cited
US4739258A
Cited
US5148259A
Cited
US4897709A
Cited
US5264377A
Cited
US5291142A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-03-05 | 1999-09-04 | 2000-03-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-03-05 | 2003-09-04 | 2004-03-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-03-05 | 2007-09-04 | 2008-03-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |