Patent US5433101A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5433101A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for self-testing a single-point automotive impact sensing system
Assignee: University of Michigan (System)
•
Filing: 1993-07-12
•
Granted: 1995-07-18
•
Expires: 2013-07-12
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for detecting faults in a single-point impact sensing system having electrically conductive self-test plates within the sensor to electrostatically deflect the sense element during self-test sequence. The deflection of the sense element is identical to deflection which would occur during an actual activation worthy impact event. The response time from the deflection of the sense element to the change in state of an activation flag is recorded and compared with an expected response time stored in non-volatile memory. Differences between the test time and the expected time is indicative of either a hard fault such as malfunction or reduced function of sensing system components or soft faults such as loss of calibration. Diagnostic self-test in this manner not only checks the electrical continuity of the impact sensing system, but also the mechanical integrity and the calibration of the sensing system.
Inventors
- 👤 Leland J. Spangler
- 👤 Michael C. Graf
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 18:19
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60R; B60R21/00; B60R21/01; B60R21/013; B60R21/0132; B60R21/017; B60R21/0173; G; G01; G01P; G01P21/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
195 words
A fault detecting apparatus for use in a vehicle impact sensing system which controls activation of a vehicle passenger restraint, the impact sensing system having a sense element which is responsive to vehicle acceleration, means for evaluating the sense element response to discriminate between an activation worthy and a non-activation worthy event, and means for indicating an activation worthy event in electrical communication with the evaluating means, the apparatus comprising: means for storing an expected impact sensing system response time period to an activation worthy event which is indicative of proper operation of the impact sensing system from initiation to change in state of activation output; means for generating a test response from the impact sensing system wherein the test response is the same as a response caused by an activation worthy event; means for measuring a time period result of the test response from initiation to change in state of activation output; and means for comparing the test response time period result with the expected response time period wherein a difference between the test response time period result and the expected response time period is indicative of a fault in the impact sensing system.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
195 words
A fault detecting apparatus for use in a vehicle impact sensing system which controls activation of a vehicle passenger restraint, the impact sensing system having a sense element which is responsive to vehicle acceleration, means for evaluating the sense element response to discriminate between an activation worthy and a non-activation worthy event, and means for indicating an activation worthy event in electrical communication with the evaluating means, the apparatus comprising: means for storing an expected impact sensing system response time period to an activation worthy event which is indicative of proper operation of the impact sensing system from initiation to change in state of activation output; means for generating a test response from the impact sensing system wherein the test response is the same as a response caused by an activation worthy event; means for measuring a time period result of the test response from initiation to change in state of activation output; and means for comparing the test response time period result with the expected response time period wherein a difference between the test response time period result and the expected response time period is indicative of a fault in the impact sensing system.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the storing means comprises a non-volatile programmable memory.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
21 words
The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the generating means comprises means for generating an electrostatic force for actuating the sense element.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
44 words
The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the generating means includes: a conductive plate disposed in proximity to the sense element to electrostatically actuate the sense element when energy is applied to the conductive plate; and means for generating energy to actuate the conductive plate.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
37 words
The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the generating means is controlled independently of the impact sensing system such that operation of the impact sensing system during generation of the test response is indistinguishable from operation during acceleration.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
32 words
The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the indicating means comprises an activation flag in electrical communication with the evaluating means which changes state when the evaluating means indicates an activation worthy event.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
49 words
The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising means for preventing activation of the passenger restraint in response to the generated test response, and means for measuring the time period result of the test response from initiation to change in state of activation output in said means for preventing actuation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
258 words
A fault-detecting apparatus for use in a vehicle impact sensing system which controls activation of a vehicle passenger restraint, the impact sensing system having a sense element which is deflectable in response to vehicle acceleration, means for evaluating the sense element response to discriminate between an activation worthy and a non-activation worthy event, and an activation flag which changes state when the evaluating means indicates an activation worthy event, the apparatus comprising: means for storing an expected impact sensing system time period response to an activation worthy event which is indicative of proper operation of the sensing system from initiation to change in state of activation output, the expected time period response being measured from the time at which the sense element is deflected to the time at which the activation flag changes state; means for generating a test response of the impact sensing system by deflecting the sense element wherein the test response caused by the means for generating is the same as a response caused by an activation worthy event; means for measuring a time period result of the test response to an activation worthy event, the time period extending from the time at which the sense element is deflected by the means for generating to the time at which the activation flag changes state; and means for comparing the test response time period result with the expected time period response wherein differences between the test response time period result and the expected time period response is indicative of a fault in the impact sensing system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
258 words
A fault-detecting apparatus for use in a vehicle impact sensing system which controls activation of a vehicle passenger restraint, the impact sensing system having a sense element which is deflectable in response to vehicle acceleration, means for evaluating the sense element response to discriminate between an activation worthy and a non-activation worthy event, and an activation flag which changes state when the evaluating means indicates an activation worthy event, the apparatus comprising: means for storing an expected impact sensing system time period response to an activation worthy event which is indicative of proper operation of the sensing system from initiation to change in state of activation output, the expected time period response being measured from the time at which the sense element is deflected to the time at which the activation flag changes state; means for generating a test response of the impact sensing system by deflecting the sense element wherein the test response caused by the means for generating is the same as a response caused by an activation worthy event; means for measuring a time period result of the test response to an activation worthy event, the time period extending from the time at which the sense element is deflected by the means for generating to the time at which the activation flag changes state; and means for comparing the test response time period result with the expected time period response wherein differences between the test response time period result and the expected time period response is indicative of a fault in the impact sensing system.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the storing means is a non-volatile programmable memory.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the for generating means provides an electrostatic force for deflecting the sense element.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
47 words
The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the generating means includes: a conductive plate disposed in proximity to the sense element to provide an electrostatic force on the sense element when energy is applied to the conductive plate; and means for generating energy to actuate the conductive plate.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
37 words
The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the generating means is controlled independently of the impact sensing system such that operation of the impact sensing system during generation of the test response is indistinguishable from operation during acceleration.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
218 words
A method for diagnosing a vehicle impact sensing system which controls activation of a vehicle passenger restraint, the impact sensing system having a sense element which is responsive to vehicle acceleration, means for evaluating the sense element response to discriminate between an activation worthy and a non-activation worthy event, and means for indicating an activation worthy event in electrical communication with the evaluating means, wherein the indicating means has an activation state and a non-activation state, the method comprising the steps of: storing a time period result of an impact sensing system response to an activation worthy event that actuates the sensor element, the stored result being an expected response time period indicative of proper operation of the sensing system from initiation to change in state of activation output; generating a test response from the impact sensing system by actuating the sense element wherein the impact sensing system response is the same as a response caused by an activation worthy event; measuring a time period result of the test response from initiation to change in state of activation output; and comparing the test response time period result with the expected response time period wherein differences between the test response time period result and the expected response time period is indicative of a fault in the impact sensing system.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
218 words
A method for diagnosing a vehicle impact sensing system which controls activation of a vehicle passenger restraint, the impact sensing system having a sense element which is responsive to vehicle acceleration, means for evaluating the sense element response to discriminate between an activation worthy and a non-activation worthy event, and means for indicating an activation worthy event in electrical communication with the evaluating means, wherein the indicating means has an activation state and a non-activation state, the method comprising the steps of: storing a time period result of an impact sensing system response to an activation worthy event that actuates the sensor element, the stored result being an expected response time period indicative of proper operation of the sensing system from initiation to change in state of activation output; generating a test response from the impact sensing system by actuating the sense element wherein the impact sensing system response is the same as a response caused by an activation worthy event; measuring a time period result of the test response from initiation to change in state of activation output; and comparing the test response time period result with the expected response time period wherein differences between the test response time period result and the expected response time period is indicative of a fault in the impact sensing system.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the expected response time period and the test response time period result are measured between the same initiation and change in state events.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the expected response time period is measured between the time at which the sense element is actuated and the time at which the indicating means changes state.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the test response time period result is measured between the time at which the sense element is actuated and the time at which the indicating means changes state.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the actuating step comprises generating an electrostatic force on the sense element to electrostatically actuate the sense element.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3921129A
Cited
US3863208A
Cited
US4243971A
Cited
US4359715A
Cited
GB2144225A
Cited
US4853623A
Cited
US4950915A
Cited
US4873452A
Cited
US4999775A
Cited
DE3816590A1
Cited
US5060504A
Cited
US5216607A
Cited
US5103667A
Cited
US5101192A
Cited
US5107245A
Cited
US4987316A
Cited
US5073860A
Cited
US4990884A
Cited
US5081442A
Cited
JPH03217356A
Cited
US5277053A
Cited
US5369305A
Cited
DE4208714A1
Cited
DE4209140A1
Cited
US5337238A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-07-17 | 1999-01-16 | 1999-07-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-07-17 | 2003-01-16 | 2003-07-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-07-17 | 2007-01-16 | 2007-07-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |