US5107245A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Control arrangement for an occupant restraint system of an automobile
Assignee: Becker Autoradiowerk GmbH
•
Filing: 1990-06-27
•
Granted: 1992-04-21
•
Expires: 2010-06-27
Abstract
Abstract The function of a control arrangement for an occupant restraint system in an automobile is continuously monitored by monitoring circuit. The monitoring circuit checks the frequency of a check signal derived from the microcomputer clock signal using a counting device which is controlled by its own stable oscillator. The monitoring circuit supplies an enable signal to the microcomputer, when such frequency is correct. If the frequency of the check signal is not found to be correct the monitoring circuit supplies a drive signal for the operation of an indicating lamp. At the same time the supply of the trip signal to the trip device is prevented. An error message is produced and the trip signal is suppressed also if the monitoring circuit itself fails.
Inventors
- 👤 Christoph Gesper
- 👤 Siegfried Heyden
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 16:39
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60R; B60R21/00; B60R21/01; B60R21/017; B60R21/0173; G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/005; G01R31/006; G01R31/007
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
172 words
A control arrangement for the occupant restraint system of an automobile, comprising an acceleration pickup for sensing deceleration of the vehicle and providing an acceleration signal, a trip device in said occupant restraint system, a microcomputer adapted to process said acceleration signal and to supply one or more trip signals to said trip device when the result of processing of said acceleration signal fulfills a criterion for activation of the occupant restraint system, and a monitoring circuit external to said microcomputer and comprising an associated stable oscillator providing a reference signal, said monitoring circuit being adapted a) to monitor as to correct frequency by comparison to said reference signal a check signal derived from a clock signal of said microcomputer; b) to produce an enable signal, when said check signal has the correct frequency; c) to activate an indicating means, when the check signal is found to be incorrect; and d) in response to the disappearance of said enable signal, to prevent the supply of the trip signal to said trip device.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
172 words
A control arrangement for the occupant restraint system of an automobile, comprising an acceleration pickup for sensing deceleration of the vehicle and providing an acceleration signal, a trip device in said occupant restraint system, a microcomputer adapted to process said acceleration signal and to supply one or more trip signals to said trip device when the result of processing of said acceleration signal fulfills a criterion for activation of the occupant restraint system, and a monitoring circuit external to said microcomputer and comprising an associated stable oscillator providing a reference signal, said monitoring circuit being adapted a) to monitor as to correct frequency by comparison to said reference signal a check signal derived from a clock signal of said microcomputer; b) to produce an enable signal, when said check signal has the correct frequency; c) to activate an indicating means, when the check signal is found to be incorrect; and d) in response to the disappearance of said enable signal, to prevent the supply of the trip signal to said trip device.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
101 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said trip device is adapted to respond to the simultaneous presence of two of said trip signals, a first said trip signal being directly supplied by the microcomputer via a blocking stage which is external to the microcomputer and which is controlled by the monitoring circuit, and a second said trip signal being delayed in the monitoring circuit by a fixed time which suffices for the monitoring of the check signal and the blocking stage is adapted only to pass on said first trip signal when the enable signal is in existence.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
95 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 2, wherein said trip device comprises a first switching transistor and a second switching transistor placed in a series circuit with an electrical trigger means, and said first trip signal supplied directly by the microcomputer is to be applied to a control electrode of said first switching transistor and said second delayed trip signal from the monitoring circuit is to be applied to a control electrode of said second switching transistor and the series circuit is arranged only to become conducting when both the trip signals are present.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said monitoring circuit is also arranged to monitor the voltage of a power supply and to only supply said enable signal when said supply voltage is within prescribed value ranges.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said monitoring circuit is adapted to supply a drive signal to an indicator lamp when one of a plurality of quantities monitored is at fault.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
53 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 5, wherein said indicator lamp is arranged also to be operated independently of the monitoring circuit by an evaluating circuit which processes the check signal to detect the presence of an AC component and to operate the indicator lamp in the absence of an AC component.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
29 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said monitoring circuit is adapted to supply a reset signal to the microcomputer after the detection of a fault condition.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 7, wherein said monitoring circuit is adapted to supply said reset signal periodically to said microcomputer.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
The control arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said monitoring circuit is produced in a technology providing for a better breakdown voltage characteristic than the breakdown voltage of the microcomputer.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-04-21 | 1995-10-21 | 1996-04-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-04-21 | 1999-10-21 | 2000-04-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-04-21 | 2003-10-21 | 2004-04-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |