Patent US5294800A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5294800A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
E-beam control data compaction system and method
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1992-07-31
•
Granted: 1994-03-15
•
Expires: 2012-07-31
Abstract
Abstract A system and method for exposing a radiation sensitive layer to one or more repetitious design cells. Each design cell includes at least one design shape on at least one buildlevel. Each shape represents a circuit shape, or part of a circuit shape on an integrated circuit layer in a circuit on an integrated circuit chip. For each buildlevel: the design is parceled into units that contain approximately the same optimum number of vertices; and for each parcel: Each design cell occurrence, or transform, is examined to determine whether it has proximity effect commonality with other cell transforms (a common environment) and, based on that determination, the cell transform is placed into one of three groups, Macro Candidates, Nested Candidates, and Unnested Candidates. In each Macro Candidate and Nested Candidate any overlapping shapes are combined, or unioned, to form a single shape and, then, the shapes are reconstructed (filled) with rectangles (fill rectangles). Each Macro Candidate design cell is proximity corrected for forward and backward scattering, and the result is placed in a Macro Buffer. Each Nested Candidate design cell is proximity corrected for forward scattering. Nested Candidates are unnested and merged with the Unnested Candidates. The unnested shapes are proximity corrected, former Nested Candidates are proximity corrected for backward scattering and former Unnested Candidates are proximity Corrected for forward and backward scattering. The proximity corrected unnested shapes are stored in a pattern buffer. Finally, the proximity corrected shapes are passed from the pattern buffer and the macro buffer to an electron beam (E-beam) tool as Numerical Control (NC) data.
Inventors
- 👤 Virginia M. Chung
- 👤 Gregory J. Dick
- 👤 Abigail S. Ganong
- 👤 Edward J. Stashluk, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 03:43
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01J; H01J37/00; H01J37/30; H01J37/302; H01J37/3023; H01J37/3026; H01J2237/00; H01J2237/30; H01J2237/317; H01J2237/3175; H01J2237/31761; H01J2237/31764; H01J2237/31769
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 42
Claim 1
Independent Claim
121 words
A system for post processing a design containing a plurality of design shapes, said post processed design shapes being converted into control for controlling a particle beam tool said system comprising: parcelling means for dividing said design into one or more parcels, each said parcel having a plurality of said design shapes; grouping means for grouping said plurality of design shapes into a plurality of groups; filling means for filling said design shapes with one or more fill shapes having the same said fill shapes having a common basic shape; correcting means for selectively applying an exposure level adjustment to said fill shapes; and cutting means for cutting at least one said fill shape into at least two smaller fill shapes.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
121 words
A system for post processing a design containing a plurality of design shapes, said post processed design shapes being converted into control for controlling a particle beam tool said system comprising: parcelling means for dividing said design into one or more parcels, each said parcel having a plurality of said design shapes; grouping means for grouping said plurality of design shapes into a plurality of groups; filling means for filling said design shapes with one or more fill shapes having the same said fill shapes having a common basic shape; correcting means for selectively applying an exposure level adjustment to said fill shapes; and cutting means for cutting at least one said fill shape into at least two smaller fill shapes.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
14 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising storage means for storing said filled shapes.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising writing means for exposing a radiation sensitive layer.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising unioning means for combining a plurality of said design shapes into a single shape.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of groups comprises a Macro Candidate group and a Nested Candidate group.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system of claim 5 wherein each Macro Candidate in said Macro Candidate group is a cell comprised of one or more of said design shapes, said each Macro Candidate has a plurality of transforms with a common environment.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
54 words
The system of claim 6 wherein each Nested Candidate in said Nested Candidate group is a cell comprised of one or more of said design shapes, said each Nested Candidate has a plurality of cell transforms, at least one said cell transform with an environment different from at least one other said cell transform.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the grouping means further comprises means for identifying a common environment for at least two cell transforms.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the grouping means further comprises means for determining a difference in an environment for at least two cell transforms.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the correcting means further comprises means for determining an exposure level adjustment for a backward scattering characteristic of said particle beam tool.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system of claim 10 wherein the correcting means further comprises means for determining an exposure level adjustment for a forward scattering characteristic of said particle beam tool.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the grouping means includes means for detecting an intrusion of a shape into a cell frame.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of post processing a design to convert said design to controls for exposing a radiation sensitive layer, said design comprised of a plurality of design shapes on a buildlevel, said method comprising: a) Defining a plurality of parcels on one said buildlevel, each said parcel containing an optimum number of said design shapes; b) Post Processing all of said design shapes in one of said parcels into particle beam control data; and c) Repeating step b) on each of said parcels until all of said plurality of design shapes are post processed.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of post processing a design to convert said design to controls for exposing a radiation sensitive layer, said design comprised of a plurality of design shapes on a buildlevel, said method comprising: a) Defining a plurality of parcels on one said buildlevel, each said parcel containing an optimum number of said design shapes; b) Post Processing all of said design shapes in one of said parcels into particle beam control data; and c) Repeating step b) on each of said parcels until all of said plurality of design shapes are post processed.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of exposing a radiation sensitive layer to a plurality of design shapes of claim 13 wherein said optimum number of design shapes is determined by an optimum vertex number.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of exposing a radiation sensitive layer to a plurality of design shapes of claim 13 wherein at least one of said parcels on said build layer has less than an optimum number of shapes.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
110 words
The method for exposing a radiation sensitive layer to a plurality of design shapes of claim 13 wherein the converting step b) compromises the steps of: i) Grouping said optimum number of design shapes into a plurality of groups, said plurality of groups comprising a Macro Candidate group, a Nested Candidate group, and an Unnested Candidate group; ii) Postprocessing the Macro Candidate group; iii) Initial postprocessing the Nested Candidate group; iv) Combining said Nested Candidate Group and said Unnested Candidate group into a single group of unnested shapes; and v) Postprocessing said single unnested shape group, wherein initial postprocessing is done only on the shapes from said Unnested Candidate Group.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 16 wherein the Macro Candidate Post Processing step ii) comprises the steps of: A) Filling each said Macro Candidate by Reconstructing each said Macro Candidate Shape from a least one fill shape; B) Proximity correcting every said fill shape; and C) Gray-splicing said Macro Candidate.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 17 wherein the filling step A) of the Macro Candidate Postprocessing step ii) further comprises Unioning at least one said Macro Candidate shape before filling each said Macro Candidate shape.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 18 wherein the Macro Candidate Postprocessing step ii) further comprises: D) storing each said filled and proximity corrected Macro Candidate in a Macro buffer.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
16 words
The Method of claim 19 wherein the stored Macro Candidate is stored as Numerical Control data.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
33 words
The Method of claims 16 wherein the Nested Candidate initial Postprocessing step iii) comprises filling each of said Nested Candidates by reconstructing each said Nested Candidate shape from at least one fill shape.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 21 wherein the Nested Candidate initial Postprocessing step iii) further comprises Unioning at least one said Nested Candidate shape before filling each said Nested Candidate Shape.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
27 words
The Method of claim 21 wherein the Nested Candidate initial Postprocessing step iii) further comprises determining a forward scattering proximity correction value for each said fill shape.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method of claim 21 wherein the single unnested shape group post processing step v) comprises the steps of: A) Filling every shape from said Unnested Group by reconstructing each said former Unnested Candidate shape from at least one fill shape; B) Determining a backward scattering Proximity Correction value for each said fill shape; and C) Determining a forward scattering Proximity Correction value for each said Unnested Candidate fill shape.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 24 wherein the single unnested shape group post processing step v) further comprises the step of: D) storing each said proximity corrected fill shape in a pattern buffer.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 22 wherein the stored fill shapes are stored as Numerical control data.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 16 wherein the Post Processing step b) further comprises the step of: vi) Exposing said radiation sensitive layer according to said post processed shapes.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
122 words
A method of post processing a design to covert said design to control for exposing a radiation sensitive layer to a plurality of design shapes comprising the steps of: a) dividing said design into one or more parcels and grouping said design shapes into a plurality of groups, said plurality groups comprising a Macro Candidate group, a Nested Candidate group, and an Unnested Candidate Group; b) post processing the Macro Candidate group; c) initial post processing the Nested Candidate group; d) combining said nested Candidate Group and said Unnested Candidate Group into a single group of unnested shapes; and e) post processing said single unnested shape group, wherein initial post processing is done only on the shapes from said Unnested Candidate Group.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
122 words
A method of post processing a design to covert said design to control for exposing a radiation sensitive layer to a plurality of design shapes comprising the steps of: a) dividing said design into one or more parcels and grouping said design shapes into a plurality of groups, said plurality groups comprising a Macro Candidate group, a Nested Candidate group, and an Unnested Candidate Group; b) post processing the Macro Candidate group; c) initial post processing the Nested Candidate group; d) combining said nested Candidate Group and said Unnested Candidate Group into a single group of unnested shapes; and e) post processing said single unnested shape group, wherein initial post processing is done only on the shapes from said Unnested Candidate Group.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 28 wherein the Macro Candidate Post Processing step b) comprises the steps of: i) Filling each said Macro Candidate by Reconstructing each said Macro Candidate Shape from at ii) Proximity correcting every said fill rectangle.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the filling step i) of the Macro Candidate Processing step b) further comprises Unioning at least one said Macro Candidate shape before filling each said Macro Candidate shape.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the Macro Candidate Post Processing step b) further comprises: iii) storing each said filled and proximity corrected Macro Candidate in a Macro buffer.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 31 wherein the stored Macro Candidate is stored as Numerical Control data.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 28 wherein the Nested Candidate initial Post Processing step c) comprises filling each of said Nested Candidates by reconstructing each said Nested Candidate shape from at least one fill shape.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 33 wherein the Nested Candidate initial processing step c) further comprises Unioning at least one said Nested Candidate shape before filling each said Nested Candidate Shape.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
28 words
The Method of claim 33 wherein the Nested Candidate initial Post Processing step c) further comprises determining a forward scattering proximity correction value for each said fill shape.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
71 words
The Method of claim 33 wherein the single unnested shape group post processing step e) comprises the steps of: i) Filling every shape from said Unnested Group by reconstructing each said former Unnested Candidate Shape from at least one fill shape; ii) Determining a backward scattering proximity correction value for each said fill shape; and iii) Determining a forward scattering proximity correction value for each former said Unnested Candidate fill shape.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
32 words
The Method of claim 36 wherein the single unnested shape group post processing step e) further comprises the step of: iv) storing each said proximity corrected fill shape in a pattern buffer.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 37 wherein the stored fill shapes are stored as numerical control data.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 28 further comprising the step of: f) Exposing said radiation sensitive layer according to said post processed shapes.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4147937A
Cited
US4259724A
Cited
US4484077A
Cited
US4482810A
Cited
US4587608A
Cited
US4520269A
Cited
US4554625A
Cited
US4820928A
Cited
US4914304A
Cited
US4878177A
Cited
US4812962A
Cited
US4895780A
Cited
US4816692A
Cited
US4943729A
Cited
EP0391636A2
Cited
US5086398A
Cited
US5159201A
Cited
US5189306A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-03-14 | 1997-09-13 | 1998-03-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-03-14 | 2001-09-13 | 2002-03-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-03-14 | 2005-09-13 | 2006-03-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |