Patent US1263218A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4710945A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4710945A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Signal selection by statistical comparison

Assignee: Motorola Solutions Inc
•
Filing: 1986-04-30
•
Granted: 1987-12-01
•
Expires: 2006-04-30
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A signal selection system is disclosed wherein a plurality of received signals are analyzed to determine their statistical characteristics. These characteristics are compared to a predetermined statistical distribution. The signal that is statistically closest to the statistical characteristics of a known signal is selected for further processing and reception.

Inventors

  • 👤 Paul M. Bocci
  • 👤 Carl M. Pietrzak, Jr.
  • 👤 Alan L. Wilson

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-25 10:45
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04B; H04B7/00; H04B7/02; H04B7/04; H04B7/08; H04B7/0802; H04B7/0817; H04B7/082

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim 136 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the plurality of received signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; (b) parsing, respectively, each of said plurality of stored signals to provide a plurality of segments; (c) determining the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; (d) computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (e) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal for each of the received digital signals; (f) selecting the optimum one of the plurality of received digital signals in response to said respective quality signals.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 136 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the plurality of received signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; (b) parsing, respectively, each of said plurality of stored signals to provide a plurality of segments; (c) determining the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; (d) computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (e) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal for each of the received digital signals; (f) selecting the optimum one of the plurality of received digital signals in response to said respective quality signals.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 52 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining comprises the steps of: (c1) parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; (c2) tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method of claim 1, which includes the step of: (e1) averaging said respective quality signals with corresponding preceding respective quality signals to provide said respective quality signals for step (f).
Claim 5
Independent Claim 154 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the received digital signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; (b) parsing each of said stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; (c) determining the number of ocurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; (d) computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (e) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal for each of the received digital signals; (f) selecting the optimum one of the plurality of received digital signals in response to said plurallity of quality signals; (g) repeating steps (c) through (f) until all of said segments of each of said plurality of stored signals are evaluated.
Claim 6
Independent Claim 154 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the received digital signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; (b) parsing each of said stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; (c) determining the number of ocurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; (d) computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (e) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal for each of the received digital signals; (f) selecting the optimum one of the plurality of received digital signals in response to said plurallity of quality signals; (g) repeating steps (c) through (f) until all of said segments of each of said plurality of stored signals are evaluated.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 52 words
The method of claim 4, wherein the step of determining comprises the steps of: (c1) parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; (c2) tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method of claim 4, which includes the step of: (e1) averaging said respective quality signals with corresponding preceding rrespective quality signals to provide said respective quality signals for step (f).
Claim 9
Independent Claim 175 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the received digital signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; (b) parsing each of said stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; (c) parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; (d) tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments; (e) computing the difference of each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (f) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal; (g) averaging, respectively, each of said quality signals with previous quality signals to provide a plurality of averaged quality signals; (h) comparing said plurality of averaged quality signals to provide the selected optimum signal; (i) repeating steps (d) through (h) until all of said segments of each of said plurality of stored signals are evaluated.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 175 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the received digital signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; (b) parsing each of said stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; (c) parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; (d) tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments; (e) computing the difference of each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (f) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal; (g) averaging, respectively, each of said quality signals with previous quality signals to provide a plurality of averaged quality signals; (h) comparing said plurality of averaged quality signals to provide the selected optimum signal; (i) repeating steps (d) through (h) until all of said segments of each of said plurality of stored signals are evaluated.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 147 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a first and second received digital signal, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the first and second digital signals to provide a first and second stored signal; (b) parsing said first and second stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; (c) determining the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; (d) computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (e) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a first and second quality signal; (f) comparing said first and second quality signals to provide the selected optimum signal; (g) repeating steps (c) through (f) until all of said segments of said first and second stored signals are evaluated.
Claim 12
Independent Claim 147 words
A method for selecting an optimum digital signal from a first and second received digital signal, comprising the steps of: (a) storing the first and second digital signals to provide a first and second stored signal; (b) parsing said first and second stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; (c) determining the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; (d) computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; (e) summing said plurality of difference values to provide a first and second quality signal; (f) comparing said first and second quality signals to provide the selected optimum signal; (g) repeating steps (c) through (f) until all of said segments of said first and second stored signals are evaluated.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 52 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the step of determining comprises the steps of: (c1) parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; (c2) tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 8, which includes the step of: (e1) averaging said first and second quality signals with corresponding preceding first and second quality signals to provide said first and second quality signals for step (f).
Claim 15
Independent Claim 132 words
An apparatus for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising: means for storing the plurality of received signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; means for parsing each of said plurality of stored signals to provide a plurality of segments; means for determining the number of occurrences of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within each of said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; means for computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; means for summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal; and means for selecting the optimum one of the plurality of received digital signal in response to said respective quality signals.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 132 words
An apparatus for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising: means for storing the plurality of received signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; means for parsing each of said plurality of stored signals to provide a plurality of segments; means for determining the number of occurrences of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within each of said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; means for computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; means for summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal; and means for selecting the optimum one of the plurality of received digital signal in response to said respective quality signals.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 50 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said determining means comprises: means for parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; means for tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 26 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said summing means includes means for averaging said quality signals, respectively, with preceding quality signals to provide respective quality signals.
Claim 19
Independent Claim 164 words
An apparatus for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising: means for storing the received digital signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; means for parsing each of said stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; means for parsing a segment into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; means for tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments; means for computing the difference of each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; means for summing said plurality of difference values to provide said quality signal; means for averaging, respectively, each of said quality signals with all previous quality signals to provide a plurality of averaged quality signals; and means for selecting the optimum received signals from the of received signals in response to said plurality of averaged quality signals.
Claim 20
Independent Claim 164 words
An apparatus for selecting an optimum digital signal from a plurality of received digital signals, comprising: means for storing the received digital signals to provide a plurality of stored signals; means for parsing each of said stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; means for parsing a segment into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; means for tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments; means for computing the difference of each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; means for summing said plurality of difference values to provide said quality signal; means for averaging, respectively, each of said quality signals with all previous quality signals to provide a plurality of averaged quality signals; and means for selecting the optimum received signals from the of received signals in response to said plurality of averaged quality signals.
Claim 21
Independent Claim 167 words
An apparatus for selecting an optimum digital signal from a first and second received digital signal, comprising: means for storing the first and second digital signals to provide a first and second stored signal; means for parsing said first and second stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; means for determining the number of occurrences of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within each of said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; means for computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; means for summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal; means for averaging, respectively, said first and second quality signals with all previous first and second quality signals to provide a first and second average quality signal; and means for selecting either said first and second received signals in response to said first and second averaged quality signals to provide the selected optimum signal.
Claim 22
Independent Claim 167 words
An apparatus for selecting an optimum digital signal from a first and second received digital signal, comprising: means for storing the first and second digital signals to provide a first and second stored signal; means for parsing said first and second stored signals into segments having a predetermined length; means for determining the number of occurrences of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns within each of said segments to provide a respective tally thereof; means for computing the difference between each of said tallied occurrences to a predetermined expected value of occurrences to provide a plurality of difference values; means for summing said plurality of difference values to provide a respective quality signal; means for averaging, respectively, said first and second quality signals with all previous first and second quality signals to provide a first and second average quality signal; and means for selecting either said first and second received signals in response to said first and second averaged quality signals to provide the selected optimum signal.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 50 words
The apparatus of claim 15, wherein said evaluating means comprises: means for parsing each of said segments into a plurality of sub-segments having a predetermined length; means for tallying the number of occurrences of each of a plurality of predetermined bit patterns defined by said predetermined length of said sub-segments.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3667057A Cited
US3995225A Cited
US4214213A Cited
US4174502A Cited
US4197502A Cited
US4342112A Cited
US4375683A Cited
US4596024A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1990-11-30 1991-06-01 1991-12-01 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1994-11-30 1995-06-01 1995-12-01 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1998-11-30 1999-06-01 1999-12-01 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag