Inverse control system

Claim 2

An inverse control system for an n-input m-output (m being 1 or a greater integer, n being an integer greater than m) linear finite impulse response (FIR) system defining n·m signal transmission channels between n input points and m output points, with n transmitting elements being disposed at the respective n input points for providing signals to said linear FIR system, wherein said inverse control system is disposed between said n transmitting elements and a common signal source for effecting an inverse control such as to provide desired impulse responses between said signal source and said m output points; said inverse control system comprises n FIR filters disposed between said signal source and respective said n transmitting elements; a j-th (j=1, 2, . . . , n) one of said FIR filters connected to a j-th one of said input points through an associated one of said transmitting elements has a number L i of taps which satisfies relationships represented by ##EQU25## for all i=1, 2, . . . , m and j=1, 2, . . . , n where w ij is the number of discrete signals representing the impulse response g ij (k) of said signal transmission channel between said j-th input point and an i-th (i=1, 2, . . . , m) one of said m output points of said linear FIR system and P i is the number of discrete signals representing said desired impulse response r i (k) between said signal source and said i-th output point; and said j-th FIR filter having filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) satisfying a relationship ##EQU26## for all i=1, 2, . . . , m where ○* represents a discrete convolution.

Claim 3

An inverse control system for an m-input n-output (m being 1 or greater integer, n being an integer greater than m) linear finite impulse response (FIR) system defining m·n signal transmission channels between m input points and n output points, with n receiving elements being disposed at the respective n output points for receiving signals provided to said linear FIR system, wherein said inverse control system is disposed between said n receiving elements and n input terminals of adder means for effecting an inverse control such as to provide desired impulse responses between the output side of said adder means and said m input points; said inverse control system comprises n FIR filters disposed between said n receiving elements and the n input terminals of said adder means, respectively; a j-th(j=1, 2, . . . , n) one of said n FIR filters connected to a j-th one of said output points through an associated one of said receiving elements having a number L i of taps which satisfies the relationships represented by ##EQU27## for all i=1, 2, . . . , m and j=1, 2, . . . , n where w ij is the number of discrete signals representing the impulse response g ij (k) of said signal transmission channel between an i-th one of said m input points and the j-th output point of said linear FIR system and P i is the number of discrete signals representing said desired impulse response r i (k) between said i-th input point and output side of said adder means; and said j-th FIR filter having filter coefficients h j (k) satisfying a relationship ##EQU28## for all i=1, 2, . . . , m where ○* represents a discrete convolution.

Claim 4

An inverse control system for an m-input n-output (m being 1 or greater integer, n being an integer greater than m) linear finite impulse response (FIR) system defining m·n signal transmission channels between m input points and n output points, with n receiving elements being disposed at the respective n output points for receiving signals provided to said linear FIR system, wherein said inverse control system is disposed between said n receiving elements and n input terminals of adder means for effecting an inverse control such as to provide desired impulse responses between the output side of said adder means and said m input points; said inverse control system comprises n FIR filters disposed between said n receiving elements and the n input terminals of said adder means, respectively; a j-th(j=1, 2, . . . , n) one of said n FIR filters connected to a j-th one of said output points through an associated one of said receiving elements having a number L i of taps which satisfies the relationships represented by ##EQU27## for all i=1, 2, . . . , m and j=1, 2, . . . , n where w ij is the number of discrete signals representing the impulse response g ij (k) of said signal transmission channel between an i-th one of said m input points and the j-th output point of said linear FIR system and P i is the number of discrete signals representing said desired impulse response r i (k) between said i-th input point and output side of said adder means; and said j-th FIR filter having filter coefficients h j (k) satisfying a relationship ##EQU28## for all i=1, 2, . . . , m where ○* represents a discrete convolution.

Claim 5

The inverse control system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said desired impulse response r i (k) is represented by P i discrete signals satisfying a relationship P.sub.i ≦w.sub.ij +L.sub.j -1 (3) for all i=1, 2, . . . , m and j=1, 2, . . . , n and said j-th FIR filter has a number L j of taps satisfying a relationship ##EQU29## for all j=1, 2, . . . , n.

Claim 6

The inverse control system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein n=m+1.

Claim 7

The inverse control system according to claim 3, wherein n=m+1.

Claim 8

The inverse control system according to claim 1 or 2, which further comprises coefficients setting means for computing the filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) satisfying the relationships (1a), (1b) and (2) by utilizing said impulse response g ij (k) and desired impulse response r i (k) and setting the computed filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) for said j-th FIR filter.

Claim 9

The inverse control system according to claim 6, wherein representing the relationship (2) by an expression R=G·H said coefficients setting means computes the filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) using a relationship H=G.sup.T (G·G.sup.T).sup.-1 ·R where ##EQU30##

Claim 10

The inverse control system according to claim 3, which further comprises coefficients setting means for computing the filter coefficients h j (k) satisfying the relations (2), (3) and (4) by utilizing said impulse response g ij (k) and desired impulse response r i (k) and setting the computed filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) for said j-th FIR filter.

Claim 11

The inverse control system according to claim 8, wherein representing the relationship (2) by an expression R=G·H said coefficients setting means computes the filter coefficients h j (k) using a relationship H=G.sup.T (G·G.sup.T).sup.-1 ·R where ##EQU31##

Claim 12

The inverse control system according to claim 8, wherein representing the relationship (2) by an expression R=G·H said coefficients setting means computes the filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) using a relation H=G.sup.-1 ·R where ##EQU32##

Claim 13

The inverse control system according to claim 6, wherein said coefficients setting means computes the filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) satisfying the relationship (2) by a recursive computation.

Claim 14

The inverse control system according to claim 11, wherein representing the relationship (2) by an expression R=G·H said coefficients setting means performs the recursive computation expressed as H(q+1)=H(q)+α(q)·G.sup.T ·(R-G·H(q)) (5) where q is the number of times the argorithm of the equation (5) is repeatedly executed, α(q) is a step size indicating an amount by which to move from H(q), and ##EQU33##

Claim 15

The inverse control system according to claim 8, wherein said coefficients setting means computes the filter coefficients h j (k) (j=1, 2, . . . , n) satisfying the relationship (2) through recursive computation.

Claim 16

The inverse control system according to claim 13, wherein representing the relationship (2) by an expression R=G·H said coefficients setting means performs the recursive computation expressed as H=(q+1)=H(q)+α(q)·G.sup.T (R=G·H(q)) (6) where q is the number of times the argorithm of the equation (6) is repeatedly executed, α(q) is a step size indicating an amount by which to move from H(q), and ##EQU34##

Claim 17

The inverse control system according to claim 6, which further comprises a waveform memory for storing each said impulse response g ij (k) of said linear FIR system to be read out therefrom and supplied to said coefficients setting means.

Claim 18

The inverse control system according to claim 8, which further comprises a waveform memory for storing each said impulse response g ij (k) of said linear FIR system to be read out therefrom and supplied to said coefficients setting means.

Claim 19

The inverse control system according to claim 15, which further comprises a desired waveform memory for storing the desired impulse response r i (k) to be read out therefrom and supplied to said coefficients setting means.

Claim 20

The inverse control system according to claim 16, which further comprises a desired waveform memory for storing the desired impulse response r i (k) to be read out therefrom and supplied to said coefficients setting means.

Claim 21

The inverse control system according to claim 1, wherein said n transmitting elements are loudspeakers and said linear FIR system is a sound field in an ordinary room, a sound pressure distribution corresponding to said desired impulse response being realized at m point in said sound field constituting respective said output points of said linear FIR system.

Claim 22

The inverse control system according to claim 19, wherein m microphones are provided at respective said m output points in said sound field to obtain output signals therefrom, the characteristics of said output signals from said m microphones being controlled to have desired characteristics corresponding to said desired impulse response n i (k) (i=1, 2, . . . , m).

Claim 23

The inverse control system according to claim 20, wherein at least one additional loudspeaker is provided and supplied with the signal from said signal source, the filter coefficients of said n FIR filters being set such as to cancel an acoustic signal radiated from said at least one additional loudspeaker and received by said m microphones, thereby removing the acoustic coupling between said at least one additional loudspeaker and said microphones.

Claim 24

The inverse control system according to claim 20, wherein an additional microphone is provided to receive room noise radiated from a noise source present in said sound field, said additional microphone constituting said signal source, the filter coefficients of said n FIR filters being set such that the acoustic signals radiated from said n loudspeakers cancel said room noise at the positions of respective said m microphones.

Claim 25

The inverse control system according to claim 1, wherein said n transmitting elements are antennas and said linear FIR system is an electromagnetic wave propagation system for transmitting electromagnetic waves, the filter coefficients of said n FIR filters being set such that the signals from said n antennas are received without distortion at m output points in said electromagnetic wave propagation system.

Claim 26

The inverse control system according to claim 2, wherein said linear FIR system is a sound field in an ordinary room, said n receiving elements are n microphones disposed at respective said n output points in said sound field, and the filter coefficients of said n FIR filters are set so that output signals from said n microphones are controlled to have desired characteristics corresponding to said desired impulse responses r i (k) (i=1, 2, . . . , m), thereby allowing said adder means to produce an output free from reverberations and/or noise.

Claim 27

The inverse control system according to claim 2, wherein said linear FIR system is an electromagnetic wave propagation system for transmitting electromagnetic waves, said n receiving elements are antennas disposed at respective said n output points, and the filter coefficients of said n FIR filters are set so that the output signals from said n antennas are controlled to have desired characteristics corresponding to said desired impulse responses r i (k) (i=1, 2, . . . , m), thereby allowing said adder means to produce an output free from multi-path ghost and/or noise.