US4596033A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Attenuation of sound waves
Assignee: Noise Cancellation Technologies Inc
•
Filing: 1985-02-21
•
Granted: 1986-06-17
•
Expires: 2005-02-21
Abstract
Abstract When sound waves are intentionally attenuated by systems using destructive interference temporal changes sometimes cause less than optimum performance. In the present invention the transfer function of a signal processing system connected between a sound detector and a sound generator destructively interfering with an unwanted sound is modified at intervals as a result of sequential measurements of the transfer function between the sound detector and a further sound detector downstream from the generator. For this purpose a data processor calculates the required transfer function and causes a data processor to vary the coefficients of a digital filter comprising the signal processing system.
Inventors
- 👤 Malcolm A. Swinbanks
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 23:16
CPC Classifications
G; G10; G10K; G10K11/00; G10K11/16; G10K11/175; G10K11/178; G10K11/1781; G10K11/17821; G10K11/17825; G10K11/17813; G10K11/17815; G10K11/17823; G10K11/1785; G10K11/17853; G10K11/17854; G10K11/1787; G10K11/17879; G10K11/17881; G10K2210/00; G10K2210/10; G10K2210/112; G10K2210/30; G10K2210/301; G10K2210/3023; G10K2210/30232; G10K2210/3045; G10K2210/3048; G10K2210/50; G10K2210/502
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
245 words
An active sound control system, comprising a first sound detection system arranged to be representative of an unwanted sound wave which it is desired to attenuate, a sound generating system, a signal processing system via which a signal derived from the detection system is arranged to be fed to the generating system so as to generate a cancelling sound wave which interferes destructively with the unwanted wave in a selected spatial region, a second sound detection system located at an observation point suitable for monitoring the performance of the control system, means for effecting a sequence of measurement operations each of which defines over a given frequency range the transfer function between the respective outputs of the first and second detection systems, and means for making a sequence of adjustments of the signal processing system such that the Rth adjustment is made between the (R+1)th and (R+2)th measurement operations and causes the transfer function of the signal processing system to have at any frequency in said range a value substantially equal to (T R P R+1 -T R+1 P R )/ (P R+1 -P R ), where T.sub. R and T R+1 represent the values at said frequency which the transfer function of the signal processing system had respectively on the occasions of the Rth and (R+1)th measurement operations, and P R and P R+ 1 respectively represent the corresponding values in respect of said transfer function between the outputs of the two detection systems.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
245 words
An active sound control system, comprising a first sound detection system arranged to be representative of an unwanted sound wave which it is desired to attenuate, a sound generating system, a signal processing system via which a signal derived from the detection system is arranged to be fed to the generating system so as to generate a cancelling sound wave which interferes destructively with the unwanted wave in a selected spatial region, a second sound detection system located at an observation point suitable for monitoring the performance of the control system, means for effecting a sequence of measurement operations each of which defines over a given frequency range the transfer function between the respective outputs of the first and second detection systems, and means for making a sequence of adjustments of the signal processing system such that the Rth adjustment is made between the (R+1)th and (R+2)th measurement operations and causes the transfer function of the signal processing system to have at any frequency in said range a value substantially equal to (T R P R+1 -T R+1 P R )/ (P R+1 -P R ), where T.sub. R and T R+1 represent the values at said frequency which the transfer function of the signal processing system had respectively on the occasions of the Rth and (R+1)th measurement operations, and P R and P R+ 1 respectively represent the corresponding values in respect of said transfer function between the outputs of the two detection systems.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
92 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the means for making a sequence of adjustments comprises first and second stores for storing signals representing even and odd numbered values, respectively, of the transfer functions between the said respective outputs of the two detection systems, third and fourth stores for storing signals representing even and odd numbered values, respectively, of the transfer function of the signal processing system, and a first data processor for calculating successive values of the transfer function of the signal processing system from the contents of the said stores.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
46 words
A system according to claim 2 wherein the signal processing system comprises a programmable digital filter and the means for making a sequence of adjustments comprises a second data processor for setting the coefficients of the filter in accordance with signals from the first data processor.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the means for effecting a sequence of measurement operations includes a frequency analyser connected to receive signals from the first and second sound detection systems.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
217 words
A method of active sound control comprising generating at a first point a first signal representative of an unwanted sound wave which it is desired to attenuate, processing the first signal to provide a drive signal for generating a cancelling sound wave which destructively interferes with the unwanted wave in a selected spatial region, generating at a second point a second signal representative of any sound wave resulting from the destructive interference, making a sequence of measurement operations each of which defines over a given frequency of range the transfer functions between the first and second points, and making a sequence of adjustments to the processing of the first signal such that the Rth adjustment is made between the (R+1)th and (R+2)th measurement operations and causes the transfer function of the first signal processing to have at any frequency in the said range a value substantially equal to (T R P R+1 -T R+1 P R )/P R+1 -P R , where R R and T R+1 represents the values at said frequency which the transfer function of the first signal processing had respectively on the occasions of the Rth and (R+1)th measurement operations, and P R and P R+1 respectively represent the corresponding values in respect of the transfer function between the first and second points.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
217 words
A method of active sound control comprising generating at a first point a first signal representative of an unwanted sound wave which it is desired to attenuate, processing the first signal to provide a drive signal for generating a cancelling sound wave which destructively interferes with the unwanted wave in a selected spatial region, generating at a second point a second signal representative of any sound wave resulting from the destructive interference, making a sequence of measurement operations each of which defines over a given frequency of range the transfer functions between the first and second points, and making a sequence of adjustments to the processing of the first signal such that the Rth adjustment is made between the (R+1)th and (R+2)th measurement operations and causes the transfer function of the first signal processing to have at any frequency in the said range a value substantially equal to (T R P R+1 -T R+1 P R )/P R+1 -P R , where R R and T R+1 represents the values at said frequency which the transfer function of the first signal processing had respectively on the occasions of the Rth and (R+1)th measurement operations, and P R and P R+1 respectively represent the corresponding values in respect of the transfer function between the first and second points.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method according to claim 6 wherein the first and second values of the transfer function of the first signal processing are respectively zero, and a value such that the first and second signals are near oscillation but stable.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
236 words
A system for cancelling unwanted signals comprising a first signal detection system arranged to be representative of an unwanted signal which it is desired to attenuate, a signal generating system, a signal processing system via which a signal derived from the detection system is arranged to be fed to the generating system so as to generate a cancelling signal which interferes destructively with the unwanted signal, a second signal detection system coupled at a point suitable for monitoring the performance of the control system, means for effecting a sequence of measurement operations each of which defines over a given frequency range the transfer function between the respective outputs of the first and second detection systems, and means for making a sequence of adjustments of the signal processing system such that the Rth adjustment is made between the (R+1)th and (R+2)th measurement operations and causes the transfer function of the signal processing system to have at any frequency in said range a value substantially equal to (T R P R+1 -T R+1 P R )/(P R+1 -P R ), where T R and T R+1 represent the values at said frequency which the transfer function of the signal processing system had respectively on the occasions of the Rth and (R+1)th measurement operations, and P R and P R+1 respectively represent the corresponding values in respect of said transfer function between the outputs of the two detection systems.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
236 words
A system for cancelling unwanted signals comprising a first signal detection system arranged to be representative of an unwanted signal which it is desired to attenuate, a signal generating system, a signal processing system via which a signal derived from the detection system is arranged to be fed to the generating system so as to generate a cancelling signal which interferes destructively with the unwanted signal, a second signal detection system coupled at a point suitable for monitoring the performance of the control system, means for effecting a sequence of measurement operations each of which defines over a given frequency range the transfer function between the respective outputs of the first and second detection systems, and means for making a sequence of adjustments of the signal processing system such that the Rth adjustment is made between the (R+1)th and (R+2)th measurement operations and causes the transfer function of the signal processing system to have at any frequency in said range a value substantially equal to (T R P R+1 -T R+1 P R )/(P R+1 -P R ), where T R and T R+1 represent the values at said frequency which the transfer function of the signal processing system had respectively on the occasions of the Rth and (R+1)th measurement operations, and P R and P R+1 respectively represent the corresponding values in respect of said transfer function between the outputs of the two detection systems.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4153815A
Cited
GB1577322A
Cited
GB1555760A
Cited
US4109108A
Cited
US4122303A
Cited
US4171465A
Cited
US4417098A
Cited
US4489441A
Cited
US4473906A
Cited
GB2088951A
Cited
GB2069280A
Cited
GB2097629A
Cited
US4480333A
Cited
GB2107960A
Cited
GB2130651A
Cited
GB2142091A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-06-16 | 1989-12-16 | 1990-06-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-06-16 | 1993-12-16 | 1994-06-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-06-16 | 1997-12-16 | 1998-06-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |