Patent US5249289A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US7729882B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US7729882B2
Active / In Force
US
⏱️ 2.3 years remaining
Method and system for assessing performance of control systems
Assignee: Tyco Fire and Security GmbH
•
Filing: 2009-01-30
•
Granted: 2010-06-01
•
Expires: 2029-01-30
Abstract
Abstract A system is disclosed for scaling performance indicators of control applications in an environmental control system. The system is configured to identify a probability distribution that is characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system and to use the probability distribution of a fault-free environmental control system in calculations to display probability distributions of data from first and second control applications on a common scale.
Inventors
- 👤 John E. Seem
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 05:01
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B23/00; G05B23/02; G05B23/0205; G05B23/0208; G05B23/0216; G05B23/0218; G05B23/0224; G05B23/024
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 25
Claim 1
Independent Claim
227 words
A system for displaying, on an electronic display device, scaled performance indicators of control applications in an environmental control system, the system comprising: a memory device configured to receive and store more than one performance indicator from a first control application, wherein the first control application includes a modulating control output to control a first device of the environmental control system, wherein the memory device is further configured to receive and store more than one performance indicator from a second control application, wherein the second control application includes a staged-control output to control a second device for the environmental control system; and computing electronics configured to identify a probability distribution function, wherein the probability distribution function is characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system, wherein the computing electronics are further configured to retrieve the performance indicators of the first and second control applications from the memory device and to calculate and store probability distributions associated with the performance indicators of the first and second control applications in the memory device, wherein the calculation is based on the identified probability distribution function, wherein the computing electronics are further configured to calculate a graphical representation of the probability distributions associated with the first and second control applications and to cause the display, on the electronic display device, of the graphical representation of the probability distributions on a common scale.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
227 words
A system for displaying, on an electronic display device, scaled performance indicators of control applications in an environmental control system, the system comprising: a memory device configured to receive and store more than one performance indicator from a first control application, wherein the first control application includes a modulating control output to control a first device of the environmental control system, wherein the memory device is further configured to receive and store more than one performance indicator from a second control application, wherein the second control application includes a staged-control output to control a second device for the environmental control system; and computing electronics configured to identify a probability distribution function, wherein the probability distribution function is characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system, wherein the computing electronics are further configured to retrieve the performance indicators of the first and second control applications from the memory device and to calculate and store probability distributions associated with the performance indicators of the first and second control applications in the memory device, wherein the calculation is based on the identified probability distribution function, wherein the computing electronics are further configured to calculate a graphical representation of the probability distributions associated with the first and second control applications and to cause the display, on the electronic display device, of the graphical representation of the probability distributions on a common scale.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the probability distributions includes performing a logarithmic transformation of the performance indicators.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
66 words
The system of claim 2 , wherein the logarithmic transformation for the first control application is given by: x 1 = log 10 ( 1 Pr [ X > x 1 ] ) where X is a random sampling generated from the identified probability distribution function for fault-free systems and Pr[X>x 1 ] is the probability that X is greater than x 1 .
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
151 words
The system of claim 2 , wherein the logarithmic transformation for the second control application is given by: x 2 = { log 10 ( 1 Pr [ X < 2 E ( x ) - x 2 ] + Pr [ X > x 2 ] ) if x 2 > E ( X ) log 10 ( 1 Pr [ X < x 2 ] + Pr [ X > 2 E ( X ) - x 2 ] ) if x 2 ≤ E ( X ) where X is a random sampling generated from the identified probability distribution function for the fault-free environmental control system, E(X) is the expected value of X, and Pr[X>x 2 ] is the probability that X is greater than x 2 .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the probability distribution function comprises a sample mean and standard deviation function.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
16 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the probability distribution function comprises a kernel density function.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the probability distribution function comprises a moments function.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the performance indicators are exponentially weighted moving averages.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
22 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the common scale comprises a plurality of dot plots ranging from good to poor performance.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
16 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the control applications are associated with an HVAC system.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the performance indicators represent error in the performance of the control applications.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
128 words
A computerized method for analyzing performance of control applications in an environmental control system, the steps of the method comprising: receiving more than one performance indicator from a first and a second control application of the environmental control system at computing electronics; identifying, using the computing electronics, a probability distribution function characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system; scaling, by the computing electronics, the performance indicators from the first and second control applications based on the identified probability distribution function characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system; determining, at the computing electronics, probability distributions associated with the scaled performance indicators of the first and second control applications; and displaying, on an electronic display system, the probability distributions of the first and second control applications on a common scale.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
128 words
A computerized method for analyzing performance of control applications in an environmental control system, the steps of the method comprising: receiving more than one performance indicator from a first and a second control application of the environmental control system at computing electronics; identifying, using the computing electronics, a probability distribution function characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system; scaling, by the computing electronics, the performance indicators from the first and second control applications based on the identified probability distribution function characteristic of a fault-free environmental control system; determining, at the computing electronics, probability distributions associated with the scaled performance indicators of the first and second control applications; and displaying, on an electronic display system, the probability distributions of the first and second control applications on a common scale.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein the common scale comprises a plurality of dot plots ranging from good to poor performance.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein the step of displaying the probability distributions includes displaying on a rug plot.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein the performance indicators are exponentially weighted moving averages.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein the performance indicators represent error in the performance of the control applications.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein the control applications are associated with an HVAC system.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , further including performing a logarithmic transformation of the performance indicators.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
73 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 18 , wherein the logarithmic transformation for the first control application is given by: x 1 = log 10 ( 1 Pr [ X > x 1 ] ) where X is a random sampling from the probability distribution for the fault-free environmental control system and Pr[X>x 1 ] is the probability that X is greater than x 1 .
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
155 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 18 , wherein the logarithmic transformation for the second control application is given by: x 2 = { log 10 ( 1 Pr [ X < 2 E ( x ) - x 2 ] + Pr [ X > x 2 ] ) if x 2 > E ( X ) log 10 ( 1 Pr [ X < x 2 ] + Pr [ X > 2 E ( X ) - x 2 ] ) if x 2 ≤ E ( X ) where X is a random sampling from the probability distribution for the fault-free environmental control system, E(X) is the expected value of X, and Pr[X>x 2 ] is the probability that X is greater than x 2 .
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
38 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein determining probability distributions associated with the performance indicators of the first and second control applications comprises utilizing a sample mean and standard deviation function.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein determining probability distributions associated with the performance indicators of the first and second control applications comprises utilizing a kernel density function.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method for analyzing performance of control applications according to claim 12 , wherein determining probability distributions associated with the performance indicators of the first and second control applications comprises utilizing a moments function.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
SU535103A1
Cited
US5414640A
Cited
US5355305A
Cited
US5506768A
Cited
US5568377A
Cited
US5566092A
Cited
US5555195A
Cited
US5682329A
Cited
US5590830A
Cited
US5791408A
Cited
US5867384A
Cited
US6122605A
Cited
US6006142A
Cited
US6408228B1
Cited
US6219590B1
Cited
US6477439B1
Cited
US6389331B1
Cited
WO2000068744A1
Cited
US6594554B1
Cited
US6223544B1
Cited
US6296193B1
Cited
US6265843B1
Cited
US6369716B1
Cited
US6415617B1
Cited
US6816811B2
Cited
US6862540B1
Cited
US6937909B2
Cited
US7124637B2
Cited
US7031880B1
Cited
US20060058898A1
Cited
US20060090467A1
Cited
US20060259285A1
Cited
US7496472B2
Cited
US20080182367A1
Cited
US20080180929A1
Cited
WO2009012269A2
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2013-05-31 | 2013-11-30 | 2014-06-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2017-05-31 | 2017-11-30 | 2018-06-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2021-05-31 | 2021-11-30 | 2022-06-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |