US5568377A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Fast automatic tuning of a feedback controller
Assignee: Johnson Controls Technology Co
•
Filing: 1994-11-29
•
Granted: 1996-10-22
•
Expires: 2014-11-29
Abstract
Abstract A feedback controller configured to automatically tune a control system by determining proportional gain, integral time and/or derivative time control parameters based on estimates of process time delay, process time constant and process gain values which are monitored by the feedback controller. The feedback controller further determines control limits for estimating the process time delay based on the resolution of the sampled values of the process output and the standard deviation of the process output during the initial steady-state condition. The feedback controller also estimates characteristic areas for a first-order response based on a first-order plus time-delay model to determine process time constant and process gain values. These process time constant, process gain and process delay estimates are translated into proportional gain, integral time and/or derivative time control parameters based on design relations of the particular feedback controller.
Inventors
- 👤 John E. Seem
- 👤 Gaylon M. Decious
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 08:08
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B13/00; G05B13/02; G05B13/0205; G05B13/024; G05B11/00; G05B11/01; G05B11/36; G05B11/42
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 38
Claim 1
Independent Claim
118 words
A method of automatically adjusting the control parameters of a feedback controller disposed to control a process in a system, comprising the steps of: specifying at least one parameter for a step test; determining if the process has reached an initial steady-state; determining at least one control limit after the system is in the initial steady-state; estimating a process time delay value for the process, said step of estimating a process time delay value including basing the process time delay value on the at least one control limit; estimating a plurality of characteristic areas, a process time constant and a process gain value; stopping the step test; and determining at least one control parameter for the feedback controller.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
118 words
A method of automatically adjusting the control parameters of a feedback controller disposed to control a process in a system, comprising the steps of: specifying at least one parameter for a step test; determining if the process has reached an initial steady-state; determining at least one control limit after the system is in the initial steady-state; estimating a process time delay value for the process, said step of estimating a process time delay value including basing the process time delay value on the at least one control limit; estimating a plurality of characteristic areas, a process time constant and a process gain value; stopping the step test; and determining at least one control parameter for the feedback controller.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: verifying the feedback controller is properly reading a process output signal; verifying an actuator in the system is working properly; and utilizing the at least one control parameter to adjust the position of the actuator in the system.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the step of specifying at least one parameter for the step test further comprises: specifying a size of step change in the controller output (M) and a sampled resolution value (R sample ), wherein the sampled resolution value is determined from the equation: ##EQU24##
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of specifying at least one parameter for the step test further comprises: estimating a maximum ratio of the process time constant to the process time delay value; and specifying a stop value based on the number of time constants until the step test is stopped.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of specifying at least one parameter for the step test further comprises specifying a sign of the process gain value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1 wherein an upper control limit and a lower control limit are determined from the equations: LCL=y-Maximum {3s, 3R.sub.sample } UCL=y+Maximum {3s, 3R.sub.sample }.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the process time delay value for the process is determined according to the equation: θ=t.sub.i+1 -t.sub.s.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of characteristic areas are determined according to the equations: ##EQU25##
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the process time constant is determined according to the equation: ##EQU26##
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the process gain value is determined according to the equation: ##EQU27##
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the feedback controller is a proportional gain (P) controller.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 11 wherein the at least one control parameter for the feedback controller is determined according to the equation: ##EQU28##
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the feedback controller is a proportional gain, integral time (PI) controller.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the at least one control parameter for the feedback controller is determined according to the equations: ##EQU29##
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the feedback controller is a proportional gain, integral time, derivative time (PID) controller.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the at least one control parameter for the feedback controller is determined according to the equations: ##EQU30##
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the system is an HVAC system.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step test is automatically stopped when the following inequalities are satisfied: ##EQU31##
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
121 words
A feedback controller disposed to control a process in a system, said apparatus comprising: means for specifying at least one parameter for a step test; means for determining if the process is in an initial steady-state; means for determining at least one control limit after the system is in the initial steady-state; means for estimating a process time delay value for the process, said means for estimating a process time delay value including basing the time delay value on the at least one control limit; means for estimating a plurality of characteristic areas, a process time constant and a process gain value; means for stopping the step test; and means for determining at least one control parameter for the feedback controller.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
121 words
A feedback controller disposed to control a process in a system, said apparatus comprising: means for specifying at least one parameter for a step test; means for determining if the process is in an initial steady-state; means for determining at least one control limit after the system is in the initial steady-state; means for estimating a process time delay value for the process, said means for estimating a process time delay value including basing the time delay value on the at least one control limit; means for estimating a plurality of characteristic areas, a process time constant and a process gain value; means for stopping the step test; and means for determining at least one control parameter for the feedback controller.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
51 words
The apparatus of claim 19 further comprising: means for verifying the feedback controller is properly reading a process output signal; means for verifying an actuator in the system is working properly; and means for utilizing the at least one control parameter to adjust the position of the actuator in the system.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
52 words
The apparatus of claim 20 wherein the means for specifying at least one parameter for the step test further comprises: means for specifying a size of step change in the controller output (M) and a sampled resolution value (R sample ), wherein the sampled resolution value is determined from the equation: ##EQU32##
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
57 words
The apparatus of claim 21 wherein the means for specifying at least one parameter for the step test further comprises: means for estimating a maximum ratio of the process time constant to the process time delay value; and means for specifying a stop value based on the number of time constants until the step test is stopped.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
30 words
The apparatus of claim 22 wherein the means for specifying at least one parameter for the step test further comprises means for specifying a sign of the process gain value.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein an upper control limit and a lower control limit are determined from the equations: LCL=y-Maximum {3s, 3R.sub.sample } UCL=y+Maximum {3s, 3R.sub.sample }.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
22 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the process time delay value for the process is determined according to the equation: θ=t.sub.i+1 -t.sub.s.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the plurality of characteristic areas are determined according to the equations: ##EQU33##
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
17 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the process time constant is determined according to the equation: ##EQU34##
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
17 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the process gain value is determined according to the equation: ##EQU35##
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the feedback controller is a proportional gain (P) controller.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
23 words
The apparatus of claim 29 wherein the at least one control parameter for the feedback controller is determined according to the equation: ##EQU36##
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
17 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the feedback controller is a proportional gain, integral time (PI) controller.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
23 words
The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the at least one control parameter for the feedback controller is determined according to the equations: ##EQU37##
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
19 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the feedback controller is a proportional gain, integral time, derivative time (PID) controller.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
23 words
The apparatus of claim 33 wherein the at least one control parameter for the feedback controller is determined according to the equations: ##EQU38##
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
12 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the system is an HVAC system.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the step test is automatically stopped when the following two inequalities are satisfied: ##EQU39## where: A=∫.sub.t.sbsb.i.sup.t.sbsp.f [y(t)-y.sub.i ]dt B=(t.sub.f -t.sub.i)[y.sub.f -y.sub.i ]-A.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-10-22 | 2000-04-22 | 2000-10-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-10-22 | 2004-04-22 | 2004-10-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-10-22 | 2008-04-22 | 2008-10-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |