Patent US7231629B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US7231629B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Feature optimization using enhanced interference mapping lithography

Assignee: ASML Netherlands BV
•
Filing: 2004-10-29
•
Granted: 2007-06-12
•
Expires: 2024-10-29
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Disclosed concepts include a method of, and program product for, optimizing an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate relative to a given mask using an optical system. Steps include mathematically representing resolvable feature(s) from the given mask, generating a mathematical expression, an eigenfunction, representing certain characteristics of the optical system, modifying the mathematical the eigenfunction by filtering, generating an interference map in accordance with the filtered eigenfunction and the mathematical expression of the given mask, and determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map. As a result, undesired printing in the surface of the substrate may be minimized.

Inventors

  • 👤 Thomas Laidig

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 10:21
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F1/00; G03F1/36; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70425; G03F7/70433; G03F7/70441; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70491; G03F7/705

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 30
Claim 1
Independent Claim 116 words
A method of optimizing an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate relative to a given mask utilizing an optical system, comprising the steps of: (a) mathematically representing a goal function representing desired printing behavior of the given mask; (b) generating a mathematical expression representing certain characteristics of the optical system; (c) modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b); (d) generating an interference map in accordance with the result of Step (c) and Step (a); and (e) determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map of Step (d), wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b) minimizes undesired printing in the surface of the substrate.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 116 words
A method of optimizing an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate relative to a given mask utilizing an optical system, comprising the steps of: (a) mathematically representing a goal function representing desired printing behavior of the given mask; (b) generating a mathematical expression representing certain characteristics of the optical system; (c) modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b); (d) generating an interference map in accordance with the result of Step (c) and Step (a); and (e) determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map of Step (d), wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b) minimizes undesired printing in the surface of the substrate.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 1 , wherein the mathematical expression generated in Step (b) is at least one eigenfunction representing certain characteristics of the optical system.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 2 , wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b) includes filtering the at least one eigenfunction.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 3 , wherein the at least one eigenfunction is filtered relative to the sidelobes of the eigenfunction.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 3 , wherein the at least one eigenfunction is filtered outside of the main lobe of the eigenfunction.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 3 , wherein the filtering removes the DC component or certain low spatial frequencies of the eigenfunction.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 3 , wherein the filtering enhances the eigenfunction for minimizing local imbalances of in-phase assist features and out-of-phase assist features generated in Step (e).
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 3 , wherein the interference map in Step (d) is generated by convolving the result of Step (a) with the result of Step (c).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 1 , wherein step (e) includes selecting in-phase assist features and out-of-phase assist features corresponding to the interference map.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 148 words
A program product, comprising executable code transportable by at least one machine readable medium, wherein execution of the code by at least one programmable computer causes the at least one programmable computer to perform a sequence of steps for optimizing an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate for a given mask utilizing an optical system, compromising: (a) mathematically representing a goal function representing desired printing behavior of the given mask; (b) generating a mathematical expression representing certain characteristics of the optical system; (c) modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b); (d) generating an interference map in accordance with the result of Step (c) and Step (a); and (e) determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map of Step (d), wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b) minimizes undesired printing in the surface of the substrate.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 148 words
A program product, comprising executable code transportable by at least one machine readable medium, wherein execution of the code by at least one programmable computer causes the at least one programmable computer to perform a sequence of steps for optimizing an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate for a given mask utilizing an optical system, compromising: (a) mathematically representing a goal function representing desired printing behavior of the given mask; (b) generating a mathematical expression representing certain characteristics of the optical system; (c) modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b); (d) generating an interference map in accordance with the result of Step (c) and Step (a); and (e) determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map of Step (d), wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b) minimizes undesired printing in the surface of the substrate.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 10 , wherein the mathematical expression generated in Step (b) is at least one eigenfunction representing certain characteristics of the optical system.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 11 , wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (b) includes filtering the at least one eigenfunction.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one eigenfunction is filtered relative to the sidelobes of the eigenfunction.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one eigenfunction is filtered outside of the main lobe of the eigenfunction.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 12 , wherein the filtering removes the DC component or certain low spatial frequencies of the eigenfunction.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 12 , wherein the filtering enhances the eigenfunction for minimizing local imbalances of in-phase assist features and out-of-phase assist features generated in Step (e).
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 12 , wherein the interference map in Step (d) is generated by convolving the result of Step (a) with the result of Step (c).
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 10 , wherein step (e) includes selecting in-phase assist features an out-of-phase assist features corresponding to the interference map.
Claim 21
Independent Claim 121 words
A method of designing an optimal mask, comprising the steps of: (a) generating an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate relative to a given mask utilizing an optical system; (b) mathematically representing a goal function representing desired printing behavior of the given mask; (c) generating a mathematical expression representing certain characteristics of the optical system; (d) modifying the mathematical expression of Step (c); (e) generating an interference map in accordance with the result of Step (d) and Step (b); and (f) determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map of Step (e), wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (c) minimizes undesired printing in the surface of the substrate.
Claim 22
Independent Claim 121 words
A method of designing an optimal mask, comprising the steps of: (a) generating an intensity profile of a pattern to be formed in a surface of a substrate relative to a given mask utilizing an optical system; (b) mathematically representing a goal function representing desired printing behavior of the given mask; (c) generating a mathematical expression representing certain characteristics of the optical system; (d) modifying the mathematical expression of Step (c); (e) generating an interference map in accordance with the result of Step (d) and Step (b); and (f) determining assist features for the given mask based on the interference map of Step (e), wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (c) minimizes undesired printing in the surface of the substrate.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 19 , wherein the mathematical expression generated in Step (c) is at least one eigenfunction representing certain characteristics of the optical system.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 20 , wherein modifying the mathematical expression of Step (c) includes filtering the at least one eigenfunction.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 21 , wherein the at least one eigenfunction is filtered relative to the sidelobes of the eigenfunction.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 21 , wherein the at least one eigenfunction is filtered outside of the main lobe of the eigenfunction.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 21 , wherein the filtering removes the DC component or certain low spatial frequencies of the eigenfunction.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 21 , wherein the filtering enhances the eigenfunction for minimizing local imbalances of in-phase assist features and out-of-phase assist features generated in Step (f).
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 21 , wherein the interference map in Step (e) is generated by convolving the result of Step (b) with the result of Step (d).
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of optimizing an intensity profile according to claim 20 , wherein step (f) includes selecting in-phase assist features and out-of-phase assist features corresponding to the interference map.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2010-06-11 2010-12-11 2011-06-12 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2014-06-11 2014-12-11 2015-06-12 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2018-06-11 2018-12-11 2019-06-12 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag