← Back to Patent Explorer
US6704920B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Process control for micro-lithography

Assignee: Nova Ltd
•
Filing: 2001-10-30
•
Granted: 2004-03-09
•
Expires: 2021-10-30
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method is presented for controlling a process to be applied to a patterned structure in a production run. Reference data is provided being representative of diffraction signatures corresponding to a group of different fields in a structure similar to the patterned structure in the production line, and of a control window for the process parameters corresponding to a signature representative of desired process results. The group of different fields is characterized by different process parameters used in the manufacture of these fields. The method utilizes an expert system trained to be responsive to input data representative of a diffraction signature to provide output data representative of corresponding effective parameters of the process. Optical measurements are applied to different sites on the patterned structure in the production line to obtain diffraction signatures of thereof and generate corresponding measured data. The expert system analyses the measured data to determine effective parameters of the process applied to the patterned structure in the production line. The effective process parameters can then be analyzed to determine deviation thereof from corresponding nominal values, to thereby enable the process control.

Inventors

  • 👤 Boaz Brill
  • 👤 Yoel Cohen

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-06 11:49
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70491; G03F7/705; G03F7/70605; G03F7/70616; H; H10; H10P; H10P74/00; H10P74/23

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 345 words
A method of controlling a process to be applied to a patterned structure in a production run, the method comprising the steps of: (i) providing reference data including data representative of diffraction signatures corresponding to a group of different fields in a structure similar to said patterned structure in a production line and data representative of a control window for the process parameters corresponding to a signature representative of desired process results, said group of different fields being characterized by different process parameters used in the manufacture of these fields; (ii) providing an expert system in the form of an artificial neural network trained to be responsive to input data representative of a diffraction signature to provide output data representative of corresponding effective parameters of the process; (iii) applying optical measurements to at least one site on said patterned structure in the production line to obtain at least one diffraction signature of said patterned structure in the production line and generate data representative thereof; (iv) supplying the generated data to said expert system, which analyses the said data to thereby directly determine effective parameters of the process applied to said patterned structure in the production line; (v) analyzing said effective process parameters to determine deviation thereof from corresponding nominal values to thereby enable process control; and (vi) verifying said effective process parameters resulting from the neural network analysis by searching in a signature library that includes results of a plurality of measurements applied to the structure and indicative of process parameters corresponding to various signatures, to thereby ensure a high reliability score of the neural network, wherein said searching is aimed at finding the diffraction signature, which corresponding process parameters within said control window are the closest ones to those of the neural network results; said verifying comprising comparing the found reference signature with the signature measured in the patterned structure in the production line to determine whether a merit function between said found signature and said measured signature is sufficiently low, being thereby indicative of the high reliability score of the neural network results.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 345 words
A method of controlling a process to be applied to a patterned structure in a production run, the method comprising the steps of: (i) providing reference data including data representative of diffraction signatures corresponding to a group of different fields in a structure similar to said patterned structure in a production line and data representative of a control window for the process parameters corresponding to a signature representative of desired process results, said group of different fields being characterized by different process parameters used in the manufacture of these fields; (ii) providing an expert system in the form of an artificial neural network trained to be responsive to input data representative of a diffraction signature to provide output data representative of corresponding effective parameters of the process; (iii) applying optical measurements to at least one site on said patterned structure in the production line to obtain at least one diffraction signature of said patterned structure in the production line and generate data representative thereof; (iv) supplying the generated data to said expert system, which analyses the said data to thereby directly determine effective parameters of the process applied to said patterned structure in the production line; (v) analyzing said effective process parameters to determine deviation thereof from corresponding nominal values to thereby enable process control; and (vi) verifying said effective process parameters resulting from the neural network analysis by searching in a signature library that includes results of a plurality of measurements applied to the structure and indicative of process parameters corresponding to various signatures, to thereby ensure a high reliability score of the neural network, wherein said searching is aimed at finding the diffraction signature, which corresponding process parameters within said control window are the closest ones to those of the neural network results; said verifying comprising comparing the found reference signature with the signature measured in the patterned structure in the production line to determine whether a merit function between said found signature and said measured signature is sufficiently low, being thereby indicative of the high reliability score of the neural network results.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 49 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said providing of the reference data comprises the steps of preparing a parametric matrix including variations of at least one process parameter within a group of different test fields and applying measurements to said different test fields to determine corresponding signatures.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method according to claim 2 , wherein the preparation of the parametric matrix comprises the step of applying the process to be controlled to the different test fields utilizing different values of one or more process parameters.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein said different values of one or more 5 process parameters are randomly distributed in said different test fields.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein said different fields are also characterized by different thickness values of underlying layers in the patterned structure.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein the process is applied to the different fields in the same test structure.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein the process is applied to the different fields in different test structures.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method according to claim 4 , wherein the process is applied to the different fields in different test structures.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the process to be controlled is a lithography process, the process parameters including at least one of exposure energy and focus of incident light.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said training of the expert system is carried out utilizing the reference data as training set.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method according to claim 1 , and also comprising the step of retraining the neural network with time by repeating steps (i) and (ii) utilizing additional test fields.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said analyzing to determine the effective process parameters comprises fitting of said generated data and the reference data.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 52 words
The method according to claim 1 , and also comprising the step of applying a reference tool to said test fields to thereby take additional measurements and generate data representative of reference tool results indicative of a control window corresponding to the desired process results to be included in the reference data.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said signature library is included in said reference data.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the neural network results are compared to the search results to ensure that the neural network results are sufficiently close to said control window.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the patterned structure under processing is a semi-conductor wafer.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method according to claim 1 , for controlling a lithography process applied to the structures progressing on a production line.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4191462A Cited
US5170293A Cited
US5840448A Cited
US5867276A Cited
US5963329A Cited
DE19922614A1 Cited
WO2000035002A1 Cited
US6115108A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2007-03-09 2007-09-08 2008-03-09 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2011-03-09 2011-09-08 2012-03-09 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2015-03-09 2015-09-08 2016-03-09 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag