Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
345 words
A method of controlling a process to be applied to a patterned structure in a production run, the method comprising the steps of: (i) providing reference data including data representative of diffraction signatures corresponding to a group of different fields in a structure similar to said patterned structure in a production line and data representative of a control window for the process parameters corresponding to a signature representative of desired process results, said group of different fields being characterized by different process parameters used in the manufacture of these fields; (ii) providing an expert system in the form of an artificial neural network trained to be responsive to input data representative of a diffraction signature to provide output data representative of corresponding effective parameters of the process; (iii) applying optical measurements to at least one site on said patterned structure in the production line to obtain at least one diffraction signature of said patterned structure in the production line and generate data representative thereof; (iv) supplying the generated data to said expert system, which analyses the said data to thereby directly determine effective parameters of the process applied to said patterned structure in the production line; (v) analyzing said effective process parameters to determine deviation thereof from corresponding nominal values to thereby enable process control; and (vi) verifying said effective process parameters resulting from the neural network analysis by searching in a signature library that includes results of a plurality of measurements applied to the structure and indicative of process parameters corresponding to various signatures, to thereby ensure a high reliability score of the neural network, wherein said searching is aimed at finding the diffraction signature, which corresponding process parameters within said control window are the closest ones to those of the neural network results; said verifying comprising comparing the found reference signature with the signature measured in the patterned structure in the production line to determine whether a merit function between said found signature and said measured signature is sufficiently low, being thereby indicative of the high reliability score of the neural network results.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
345 words
A method of controlling a process to be applied to a patterned structure in a production run, the method comprising the steps of: (i) providing reference data including data representative of diffraction signatures corresponding to a group of different fields in a structure similar to said patterned structure in a production line and data representative of a control window for the process parameters corresponding to a signature representative of desired process results, said group of different fields being characterized by different process parameters used in the manufacture of these fields; (ii) providing an expert system in the form of an artificial neural network trained to be responsive to input data representative of a diffraction signature to provide output data representative of corresponding effective parameters of the process; (iii) applying optical measurements to at least one site on said patterned structure in the production line to obtain at least one diffraction signature of said patterned structure in the production line and generate data representative thereof; (iv) supplying the generated data to said expert system, which analyses the said data to thereby directly determine effective parameters of the process applied to said patterned structure in the production line; (v) analyzing said effective process parameters to determine deviation thereof from corresponding nominal values to thereby enable process control; and (vi) verifying said effective process parameters resulting from the neural network analysis by searching in a signature library that includes results of a plurality of measurements applied to the structure and indicative of process parameters corresponding to various signatures, to thereby ensure a high reliability score of the neural network, wherein said searching is aimed at finding the diffraction signature, which corresponding process parameters within said control window are the closest ones to those of the neural network results; said verifying comprising comparing the found reference signature with the signature measured in the patterned structure in the production line to determine whether a merit function between said found signature and said measured signature is sufficiently low, being thereby indicative of the high reliability score of the neural network results.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said providing of the reference data comprises the steps of preparing a parametric matrix including variations of at least one process parameter within a group of different test fields and applying measurements to said different test fields to determine corresponding signatures.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method according to claim 2 , wherein the preparation of the parametric matrix comprises the step of applying the process to be controlled to the different test fields utilizing different values of one or more process parameters.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein said different values of one or more 5 process parameters are randomly distributed in said different test fields.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein said different fields are also characterized by different thickness values of underlying layers in the patterned structure.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein the process is applied to the different fields in the same test structure.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method according to claim 3 , wherein the process is applied to the different fields in different test structures.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method according to claim 4 , wherein the process is applied to the different fields in different test structures.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the process to be controlled is a lithography process, the process parameters including at least one of exposure energy and focus of incident light.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said training of the expert system is carried out utilizing the reference data as training set.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method according to claim 1 , and also comprising the step of retraining the neural network with time by repeating steps (i) and (ii) utilizing additional test fields.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said analyzing to determine the effective process parameters comprises fitting of said generated data and the reference data.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method according to claim 1 , and also comprising the step of applying a reference tool to said test fields to thereby take additional measurements and generate data representative of reference tool results indicative of a control window corresponding to the desired process results to be included in the reference data.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein said signature library is included in said reference data.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the neural network results are compared to the search results to ensure that the neural network results are sufficiently close to said control window.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the patterned structure under processing is a semi-conductor wafer.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method according to claim 1 , for controlling a lithography process applied to the structures progressing on a production line.