Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 82
Claim 1
Independent Claim
56 words
A method of limiting bids in an electronic auction, comprising: offering a lot to a plurality of bidders; receiving a bid from a bidder for said lot; determining whether said bid is better than a previous bid by said bidder by at least a predefined positive percentage; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
56 words
A method of limiting bids in an electronic auction, comprising: offering a lot to a plurality of bidders; receiving a bid from a bidder for said lot; determining whether said bid is better than a previous bid by said bidder by at least a predefined positive percentage; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said accepting step comprises presenting a warning to the bidder if said bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and accepting said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said accepting step comprises accepting said bid only if said bid fails to beat the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
53 words
A method of limiting bids in an electronic auction, comprising: offering a lot to a plurality of bidders; receiving a bid from a bidder for said lot; determining whether said bid is better than or meets a threshold defined by a historical lot price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
53 words
A method of limiting bids in an electronic auction, comprising: offering a lot to a plurality of bidders; receiving a bid from a bidder for said lot; determining whether said bid is better than or meets a threshold defined by a historical lot price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
54 words
A method of limiting bids in an electronic auction, comprising: offering a lot to a plurality of bidders; receiving a bid from a bidder for said lot; determining whether said bid is better than a market leading bid by at least a predefined positive percentage; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
54 words
A method of limiting bids in an electronic auction, comprising: offering a lot to a plurality of bidders; receiving a bid from a bidder for said lot; determining whether said bid is better than a market leading bid by at least a predefined positive percentage; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 5 , wherein said accepting step comprises presenting a warning to the bidder if said bid is better than the market leading bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and accepting said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 5 , wherein said accepting step comprises accepting said bid only if said bid fails to beat the market leading bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
136 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising the steps of: (a) offering a lot, defined at least in part by an originator, to a plurality of potential bidders, said lot having at least one product; (b) defining a closing time for said lot, wherein said closing time for said lot defines a time before which bids for the lot are to be submitted by a potential bidder; (a) receiving bids from potential bidders for said lot; (b) determining whether an erroneous bid has been submitted by a bidder; (c) if an erroneous bid has been submitted, deleting in real-time an erroneous bid and any consequential bids of said erroneous bid from the auction; and (d) communicating with potential bidders that said erroneous bid and said consequential bids have been deleted from the auction.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
136 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising the steps of: (a) offering a lot, defined at least in part by an originator, to a plurality of potential bidders, said lot having at least one product; (b) defining a closing time for said lot, wherein said closing time for said lot defines a time before which bids for the lot are to be submitted by a potential bidder; (a) receiving bids from potential bidders for said lot; (b) determining whether an erroneous bid has been submitted by a bidder; (c) if an erroneous bid has been submitted, deleting in real-time an erroneous bid and any consequential bids of said erroneous bid from the auction; and (d) communicating with potential bidders that said erroneous bid and said consequential bids have been deleted from the auction.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 8 , wherein step (b) comprises the step of receiving a communication from a bidder that a submitted bid is in error.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 8 , wherein step (c) comprises the step of deleting bids from the auction based upon input from an auction coordinator.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 8 , wherein step (d) comprises the step of causing a message dialog box to be displayed to the potential bidders.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
77 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a bid for a lot from a bidder; determining whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid received from said bidder; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
77 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a bid for a lot from a bidder; determining whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid received from said bidder; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 12 , wherein said accepting step comprises presenting a warning to the bidder if said bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and accepting said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 13 , wherein said accepting step comprises presenting a warning to the bidder if said bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and accepting said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 12 , wherein said accepting step comprises accepting said bid only if said bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
77 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a bid for a lot from a bidder; determining whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a threshold defined by a historical price for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than the threshold by at least one of a predefined percentage and a predefined price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
77 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a bid for a lot from a bidder; determining whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a threshold defined by a historical price for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than the threshold by at least one of a predefined percentage and a predefined price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
76 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a bid for a lot from a bidder; determining whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 24
Independent Claim
76 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a bid for a lot from a bidder; determining whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accepting said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said accepting step comprises presenting a warning to the bidder if said bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and accepting said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 18 , wherein said accepting step comprises presenting a warning to the bidder if said bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and accepting said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 17 , wherein said accepting step comprises accepting said bid only if said bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 28
Independent Claim
95 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a first bid for a lot from a bidder; accepting said first bid as one of a plurality of bids for said lot; determining that said first bid is an erroneous bid; removing said first bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination; receiving a second bid for said lot based on said first bid; accepting said second bid as one of said plurality of bids; and removing said second bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination.
Claim 29
Independent Claim
95 words
A method to limit bids in an electronic auction, comprising: receiving a first bid for a lot from a bidder; accepting said first bid as one of a plurality of bids for said lot; determining that said first bid is an erroneous bid; removing said first bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination; receiving a second bid for said lot based on said first bid; accepting said second bid as one of said plurality of bids; and removing said second bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 21 , wherein said bids are received from a plurality of bidders, and further comprising: sending a message to each of said bidders that said first and second bids are erroneous; and receiving an acknowledgment to said message from each of said bidders.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
92 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid for a lot from a bidder; determine whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid received from said bidder; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accept said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
92 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid for a lot from a bidder; determine whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid received from said bidder; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accept said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
47 words
The machine readable medium of claim 23 , wherein said instructions cause said processor to present a warning to the bidder if said bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and accept said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
56 words
The machine readable medium of claim 24 , wherein said instructions cause said processor to present a warning to the bidder if said bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and accept said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
26 words
The machine readable medium of claim 23 , wherein said instructions cause said processor to accept said bid only if said bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
92 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid for a lot from a bidder; determine whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a threshold defined by a historical price for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than the threshold by at least one of a predefined percentage and a predefined price; and accept said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
92 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid for a lot from a bidder; determine whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a threshold defined by a historical price for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than the threshold by at least one of a predefined percentage and a predefined price; and accept said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
91 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid for a lot from a bidder; determine whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accept said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
91 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid for a lot from a bidder; determine whether said bid passes a fail-safe criteria, wherein said fail-safe criteria comprises: comparing said bid to a previous bid for said lot; and determining whether said bid is better than said previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and accept said bid in accordance with said determination.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
47 words
The machine readable medium of claim 28 , wherein said instructions cause said processor to present a warning to the bidder if said bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and accept said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
56 words
The machine readable medium of claim 29 , wherein said instructions cause said processor to present a warning to the bidder if said bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and accept said bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
26 words
The machine readable medium of claim 28 , wherein said instructions cause said processor to accept said bid only if said bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
110 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a first bid for a lot from a bidder; accept said first bid as one of a plurality of bids for said lot; determine that said first bid is an erroneous bid; remove said first bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination; receive a second bid for said lot based on said first bid; accept said second bid as one of said plurality of bids; and remove said second bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
110 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an electronic auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a first bid for a lot from a bidder; accept said first bid as one of a plurality of bids for said lot; determine that said first bid is an erroneous bid; remove said first bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination; receive a second bid for said lot based on said first bid; accept said second bid as one of said plurality of bids; and remove said second bid from said plurality of bids in accordance with said determination.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
49 words
The machine readable medium of claim 32 , wherein said bids are received from a plurality of bidders, and further comprising: sending a message to each of said bidders that said first and second bids are erroneous; and receiving an acknowledgment to said message from each of said bidders.
Claim 46
Independent Claim
72 words
A method of limiting bids in an online auction, comprising: receiving a bid from a bidder and entering it into the auction; determining whether the bid is erroneous; and if the bid is erroneous, deleting the erroneous bid and any consequential bids of said erroneous bid from the auction; whereby bidders in the online auction are connected over a communications network and submit bids into the online auction via an electronic link.
Claim 47
Independent Claim
72 words
A method of limiting bids in an online auction, comprising: receiving a bid from a bidder and entering it into the auction; determining whether the bid is erroneous; and if the bid is erroneous, deleting the erroneous bid and any consequential bids of said erroneous bid from the auction; whereby bidders in the online auction are connected over a communications network and submit bids into the online auction via an electronic link.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 34 , additionally comprising: communicating with bidders that said erroneous bid and said consequential bids have been deleted form the auction.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 34 , wherein said determining comprises receiving a communication from the bidder that the received bid is in error.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
87 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an online auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid from a bidder and enter it into the auction; determine whether the bid is erroneous; and if the bid is erroneous, delete the erroneous bid and any consequential bids of said erroneous bid from the auction; whereby bidders in the online auction are connected over a communications network and submit bids into the online auction via an electronic link.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
87 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for limiting bids in an online auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a bid from a bidder and enter it into the auction; determine whether the bid is erroneous; and if the bid is erroneous, delete the erroneous bid and any consequential bids of said erroneous bid from the auction; whereby bidders in the online auction are connected over a communications network and submit bids into the online auction via an electronic link.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
32 words
The machine-readable medium of claim 37 , additionally comprising instructions that cause the processor to: communicate with bidders that said erroneous bid and said consequential bids have been deleted from the auction.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
37 words
The machine-readable medium of claim 37 , wherein said instructions cause the processor to determine whether the bid is erroneous in response to receipt of a communication from the bidder that the received bid is in error.
Claim 54
Independent Claim
144 words
A method for a bidder to remove a bid that was submitted in response to an erroneous bid in an online auction, comprising the steps of: (a) displaying current bids in the online auction to the bidder, wherein at least one bid has been submitted to the auction in error; (b) submitting a bid from the bidder that is in response to said erroneous bid; (c) receiving a notification that the bid submitted in step (b) was in response to an erroneous bid; and (d) displaying current bids in the online auction to the bidder, wherein said erroneous bid and the bid submitted in step (b) are both removed; whereby the bidder is one of a plurality of bidders connected by a communications network to the online auction and submits bids into the auction via an electronic link during the conducting of the auction.
Claim 55
Independent Claim
144 words
A method for a bidder to remove a bid that was submitted in response to an erroneous bid in an online auction, comprising the steps of: (a) displaying current bids in the online auction to the bidder, wherein at least one bid has been submitted to the auction in error; (b) submitting a bid from the bidder that is in response to said erroneous bid; (c) receiving a notification that the bid submitted in step (b) was in response to an erroneous bid; and (d) displaying current bids in the online auction to the bidder, wherein said erroneous bid and the bid submitted in step (b) are both removed; whereby the bidder is one of a plurality of bidders connected by a communications network to the online auction and submits bids into the auction via an electronic link during the conducting of the auction.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim
158 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for removing a bid that was submitted in response to an erroneous bid in an online auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: (a) display current bids in the online auction to a bidder, wherein at least one bid has been submitted to the auction in error; (b) submit a bid from the bidder that is in response to said erroneous bid; (c) receive a notification that the bid submitted in (b) was in response to an erroneous bid; and (d) display, in response to the error notification, current bids in the online auction to the bidder, wherein said erroneous bid and the bid submitted in response to said erroneous bid are both removed; whereby the bidder is one of a plurality of bidders connected by a communications network to the online auction and submits bids during the conducting of the auction via an electronic link.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim
158 words
A machine-readable medium that includes instructions for removing a bid that was submitted in response to an erroneous bid in an online auction wherein such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: (a) display current bids in the online auction to a bidder, wherein at least one bid has been submitted to the auction in error; (b) submit a bid from the bidder that is in response to said erroneous bid; (c) receive a notification that the bid submitted in (b) was in response to an erroneous bid; and (d) display, in response to the error notification, current bids in the online auction to the bidder, wherein said erroneous bid and the bid submitted in response to said erroneous bid are both removed; whereby the bidder is one of a plurality of bidders connected by a communications network to the online auction and submits bids during the conducting of the auction via an electronic link.
Claim 58
Dependent Claim
99 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a previous and a current bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least a predefined positive percentage; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 59
Dependent Claim
99 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a previous and a current bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least a predefined positive percentage; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim
57 words
The bidding device of claim 42 , wherein the bidding device presents a warning to the bidder if the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and the auction accepts the current bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the current bid.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim
32 words
The bidding device of claim 42 , wherein the auction accepts the current bid only if the current bid fails to beat the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 62
Dependent Claim
81 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the current bid meets a threshold defined by a historical lot price; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the current bid meets the threshold.
Claim 63
Dependent Claim
81 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the current bid meets a threshold defined by a historical lot price; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the current bid meets the threshold.
Claim 64
Dependent Claim
95 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the bid is better than a market leading bid by at least a predefined positive percentage; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the bid is better than the market leading bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 65
Dependent Claim
95 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the bid is better than a market leading bid by at least a predefined positive percentage; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the bid is better than the market leading bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 66
Dependent Claim
55 words
The bidding device of claim 46 , wherein the bidding device presents a warning to the bidder if the bid is better than the market leading bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and the auction accepts the bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 67
Dependent Claim
31 words
The bidding device of claim 46 , wherein the auction accepts the bid only if the bid fails to beat the market leading bid by at least the predefined positive percentage.
Claim 68
Dependent Claim
107 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a previous and a current bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the current bid passes a fail-safe criteria by determining whether the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predetermined positive price; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the current bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 69
Dependent Claim
107 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a previous and a current bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the current bid passes a fail-safe criteria by determining whether the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predetermined positive price; and wherein the auction accepts the current bid in accordance with whether the current bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 70
Dependent Claim
48 words
The bidding device of claim 49 , wherein the bidding device presents a warning to the bidder if the current bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and the auction accepts the current bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the current bid.
Claim 71
Dependent Claim
54 words
The bidding device of claim 50 , wherein the bidding device presents a warning to the bidder if the current bid is better than the previous bid by at least the predefined positive percentage, and the auction accepts the current bid only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the current bid.
Claim 72
Dependent Claim
23 words
The bidding device of claim 49 , wherein the auction accepts the current bid only if the current bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 73
Dependent Claim
107 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the bid passes a fail-safe criteria by determining whether the bid is better than a threshold defined by a historical price for the lot by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predetermined positive price; and wherein the auction accepts the bid in accordance with whether the current bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 74
Dependent Claim
107 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the bid passes a fail-safe criteria by determining whether the bid is better than a threshold defined by a historical price for the lot by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predetermined positive price; and wherein the auction accepts the bid in accordance with whether the current bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 75
Dependent Claim
46 words
The bidding device of claim 53 , wherein the bidding device presents a warning to the bidder if the bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and the auction accepts the current bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 76
Dependent Claim
21 words
The bidding device of claim 53 , wherein the auction accepts the bid only if the bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 77
Dependent Claim
109 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the bid is better than a previous bid for the lot by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and wherein the auction accepts the bid in accordance with whether the bid is better than the previous bid by at least one of the predefined positive percentage and the predefined positive price.
Claim 78
Dependent Claim
109 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection; wherein the auction determines whether the bid is better than a previous bid for the lot by at least one of a predefined positive percentage and a predefined positive price; and wherein the auction accepts the bid in accordance with whether the bid is better than the previous bid by at least one of the predefined positive percentage and the predefined positive price.
Claim 79
Dependent Claim
45 words
The bidding device of claim 56 , wherein the bidding device presents a warning to the bidder if the bid fails the fail-safe criteria, and the auction accepts the bid in the auction only if, in response to the warning, the bidder confirms the bid.
Claim 80
Dependent Claim
21 words
The bidding device of claim 56 , wherein the auction accepts the bid only if the bid passes the fail-safe criteria.
Claim 81
Dependent Claim
100 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction, wherein a bid for the lot has been submitted to the auction in error; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection in response to the erroneous bid; and wherein the auction deletes, in response to receipt of a communication from a bidder that submitted the erroneous bid, both the erroneous bid and the bid submitted in response to the erroneous bid.
Claim 82
Dependent Claim
100 words
A bidding device operated by a bidder during an electronic auction, said bidding device comprising: software that displays information about a lot to a bidder during the electronic auction, wherein a bid for the lot has been submitted to the auction in error; wherein the software submits a bid by the bidder to the electronic auction via an online connection in response to the erroneous bid; and wherein the auction deletes, in response to receipt of a communication from a bidder that submitted the erroneous bid, both the erroneous bid and the bid submitted in response to the erroneous bid.