US6405159B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for categorizing, describing and modeling types of system users
Assignee: AT&T Labs Inc
•
Filing: 1998-06-03
•
Granted: 2002-06-11
•
Expires: 2018-06-03
Abstract
Abstract A method for categorizing, describing, and modeling types of system users where information from the models can be used in designing a user interface. Users may have improved performance using the user interface. A list of tentative behaviors of the users is created. This list is created by identifying the goals desired for the user interface or the user models, and listing expected and desired behaviors that are relevant to these goals. The list is revised to include only those behaviors that are important or frequent based on the goals. Categorizing the behaviors is performed by obtaining information from users regarding their characteristics and behaviors. Each user's behavioral information is then converted to a score or value. The users are then mapped or charted based on which behaviors they exhibit. The mapping or charting is analyzed to identify clusters of users. These clusters define groups of users that have similar behaviors. The groups are then analyzed to produce descriptions of each group. This consists of selecting one or more users from each group and obtaining additional behavioral information. This additional behavioral information is analyzed to produce descriptions for each group. These descriptions are then used to formulate models of behaviors for each group. Information from these models can be used to design and create a user interface that helps increase user performance when using this user interface.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert R. Bushey
- 👤 Jennifer M. Mauney
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 16:23
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F8/00; G06F8/30; G06F8/38
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 33
Claim 1
Independent Claim
99 words
A method for modeling types of system users, the models being used to provide data for designing a system user interface, comprising: categorizing behaviors of a plurality of types of users into at least two groups of users, each group including at least one user and at least one other user, the at least one user having behavior that differs from behavior of the at least one other user; describing behaviors of each group of users, based on behaviors of selected users from each group; and modeling the described behaviors of each group to design a desired user interface.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
99 words
A method for modeling types of system users, the models being used to provide data for designing a system user interface, comprising: categorizing behaviors of a plurality of types of users into at least two groups of users, each group including at least one user and at least one other user, the at least one user having behavior that differs from behavior of the at least one other user; describing behaviors of each group of users, based on behaviors of selected users from each group; and modeling the described behaviors of each group to design a desired user interface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the behaviors include navigation behaviors.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the behaviors include parallel processing behaviors.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the behaviors include customer sales behaviors.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein categorizing comprises charting the behaviors on a chart having two or more dimensions.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein categorizing comprises charting the behaviors on a three dimensional chart.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein categorizing comprises charting the behaviors on a four dimensional chart.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein the dimensions include performance measures.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein the dimensions include cognitive workload measures.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein the dimensions include behavioral measures.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein the dimensions include user characteristic measures.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method recited in claim 5 wherein the dimensions include a combination of performance, cognitive workload, behavioral, and user characteristic measures.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein describing is related to examining the behaviors for similarities within each group.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein describing is related to examining the behaviors for differences between each group.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method recited in claim 1 , wherein describing comprises listing tasks by frequency and importance and selecting a task from the most important and frequent tasks for detailed task analysis.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method recited in claim 15 wherein the detailed task analysis comprises capturing at least one of the perceptual, cognitive, and motor stages of human behavior.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method recited in claim 16 further comprising quantifying each stage as to processing speed and cognitive load.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method recited in claim 15 wherein the detailed task analysis is accomplished by using at least one of a GOMS and modified GOMS methodology.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the models include qualitative models.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method recited in claim 19 wherein the qualitative models include how the users within a specific group behave in certain situations.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method recited in claim 19 wherein the qualitative models include how the users within a specific group perform certain functions.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the models include quantitative models.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method recited in claim 22 wherein the quantitative models incorporate the capability to make numerical performance predictions.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the models of the behaviors are constructed in an interactive process that results in the models representing the strategies and activities for each group.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method recited in claim 24 further comprising validating the models.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method recited in claim 25 wherein validating the models uses actual data.
Claim 28
Independent Claim
196 words
A method for modeling behaviors of interface users, the models being used to provide data for designing a system user interface, comprising: creating a list of user behaviors; identifying important behaviors, based on desired goals for a system interface; obtaining data related to the important behaviors from a plurality of users; graphing the data, axises of the graph being related to at least two important behaviors of the plurality of users; identifying clusters in the graphed data, the clusters representing groups of users with similar important behaviors, each user group having at least one user and at least one other user, the at least one user having at least one important behavior that differs from important behavior of the at least one other user; selecting at least one user from each user group to represent the user group's behavior; obtaining additional data from the selected users, the additional data related to the selected users' behaviors; describing the behavior of each group users' based upon the additional data obtained from the selected users; and creating models of said selected users' behaviors to design a desired system user interface, based on the descriptions of the selected users' behaviors.
Claim 29
Independent Claim
196 words
A method for modeling behaviors of interface users, the models being used to provide data for designing a system user interface, comprising: creating a list of user behaviors; identifying important behaviors, based on desired goals for a system interface; obtaining data related to the important behaviors from a plurality of users; graphing the data, axises of the graph being related to at least two important behaviors of the plurality of users; identifying clusters in the graphed data, the clusters representing groups of users with similar important behaviors, each user group having at least one user and at least one other user, the at least one user having at least one important behavior that differs from important behavior of the at least one other user; selecting at least one user from each user group to represent the user group's behavior; obtaining additional data from the selected users, the additional data related to the selected users' behaviors; describing the behavior of each group users' based upon the additional data obtained from the selected users; and creating models of said selected users' behaviors to design a desired system user interface, based on the descriptions of the selected users' behaviors.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method recited in claim 1 further comprising creating a user interface using information from the models.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method recited in claim 28 wherein the plurality of users' performance is improved when using the user interface.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method recited in claim 14 further comprising designing a user interface using information from the models.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method recited in claim 30 wherein the plurality of users have improved performance using the user interface.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4964077A
Cited
US5115501A
Cited
US5204968A
Cited
US5327529A
Cited
US5299260A
Cited
US5206903A
Cited
US5535321A
Cited
US5263167A
Cited
US5335269A
Cited
US5388198A
Cited
US5495567A
Cited
US5806060A
Cited
US5659724A
Cited
US5420975A
Cited
US5586060A
Cited
US5519772A
Cited
US5561711A
Cited
US5537470A
Cited
US5600781A
Cited
US5594791A
Cited
US5615323A
Cited
US5710884A
Cited
US5657383A
Cited
US5684872A
Cited
US5848396A
Cited
US5991735A
Cited
US5727950A
Cited
US5884029A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2005-06-10 | 2005-12-10 | 2006-06-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2009-06-10 | 2009-12-10 | 2010-06-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2013-06-10 | 2013-12-10 | 2014-06-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |