US5388198A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Proactive presentation of automating features to a computer user
Assignee: DATA CARRIERS LLC
•
Filing: 1992-04-16
•
Granted: 1995-02-07
•
Expires: 2012-04-16
Abstract
Abstract A system for proactively automating the use of a computer comprises a central processing unit (CPU), an input device, a display device and memory including a set of feature templates, context monitoring unit, input monitoring unit, feature presentation routines and feature implementation routines. The CPU is coupled to the display device and input devices for displaying information and receiving information, respectively. The CPU is also coupled to the input monitoring unit and the context monitoring unit to detect and record user manipulations of the input device and its context. The CPU is also coupled to a section of memory containing feature templates. Each template is a set of input manipulation steps and program contexts. The CPU compares the recorded user manipulations of the input and their corresponding program context with the feature templates stored in memory. If a match is found, the CPU uses the feature presentation routines to present different features on the display to the user and implements the features with the feature implementation routines according to user selection.
Inventors
- 👤 Andrew J. Layman
- 👤 David C. Berkovec
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 07:04
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F9/00; G06F9/06; G06F9/44; G06F9/451; G06F9/453
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
173 words
A system for proactively automating an operation of a general purpose computer having a central processing unit (CPU), a display device, an input device and memory with application programs and routines by automatically intervening in a user's manipulations of the input device to present automating features, the system comprising: an input monitoring means coupled to the CPU and the input device for continuously detecting and recording the user's manipulations of the input device to achieve a desired result; a context monitoring means coupled to the CPU for continuously detecting and recording a state of an application program during the user's manipulation of the input device; a plurality of feature templates, each feature template including input information representing manipulations of the input device and a state of the application, program for identifying the desired result; wherein said memory further comprises feature presentation routines corresponding to each feature template, for controlling the CPU to display automating features on the display device that achieve a result having greater generality or persistence than the identified desired result.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
173 words
A system for proactively automating an operation of a general purpose computer having a central processing unit (CPU), a display device, an input device and memory with application programs and routines by automatically intervening in a user's manipulations of the input device to present automating features, the system comprising: an input monitoring means coupled to the CPU and the input device for continuously detecting and recording the user's manipulations of the input device to achieve a desired result; a context monitoring means coupled to the CPU for continuously detecting and recording a state of an application program during the user's manipulation of the input device; a plurality of feature templates, each feature template including input information representing manipulations of the input device and a state of the application, program for identifying the desired result; wherein said memory further comprises feature presentation routines corresponding to each feature template, for controlling the CPU to display automating features on the display device that achieve a result having greater generality or persistence than the identified desired result.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system of claim 1, wherein said memory further comprises feature implementation routines for controlling the CPU to modify the state of the application program and implement an automating feature of the application program when selected by the user.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
79 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the CPU compares the detected state and manipulations recorded by the context monitoring means and the input monitoring means, respectively, to the input information included in the plurality of feature templates, and if the detected state and manipulations match the input information of one of the plurality of feature templates, uses the feature presentation routines to present the automating features that achieve the result having greater generality or persistence than the desired result.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the input device is keyboard and a mouse-type controller, and the input monitoring means detects use of both devices.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
191 words
A method for proactively automating an operation of an application program on a general purpose computer comprising an input device, a central processing unit, a display device and memory means, said memory means including a plurality of feature templates, feature presentation and implementation routines, by automatically intervening in a user's manipulations of the input device to present automating features, said method comprising the steps of: continuously monitoring for the user's manipulations of the input device; continuously monitoring a context of an application program in which the input device is manipulated by the user; comparing the monitored user's manipulations of the input device and state of the application program to input information in the plurality of feature templates stored in memory and corresponding to existing features provided by the application program, to identify a result desired by the user; and presenting an automating feature corresponding to a feature template on the display device that achieves a result having greater generality or persistence than the identified desired result if said step of comparing produces a match between the input information of the feature template and the monitored device manipulations and application program state.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
191 words
A method for proactively automating an operation of an application program on a general purpose computer comprising an input device, a central processing unit, a display device and memory means, said memory means including a plurality of feature templates, feature presentation and implementation routines, by automatically intervening in a user's manipulations of the input device to present automating features, said method comprising the steps of: continuously monitoring for the user's manipulations of the input device; continuously monitoring a context of an application program in which the input device is manipulated by the user; comparing the monitored user's manipulations of the input device and state of the application program to input information in the plurality of feature templates stored in memory and corresponding to existing features provided by the application program, to identify a result desired by the user; and presenting an automating feature corresponding to a feature template on the display device that achieves a result having greater generality or persistence than the identified desired result if said step of comparing produces a match between the input information of the feature template and the monitored device manipulations and application program state.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of implementing the automating feature corresponding to the matched feature template instead of the user's input device manipulations in the state of the application program.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 5, wherein said steps of monitoring also record the manipulations of the input device and the state of the application program.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 5, wherein said steps of monitoring, comparing and presenting are performed while the application program operates.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of selecting for presentation an automating feature that accomplishes a result that is closest to the desired result identified from the monitored manipulations of the input device.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of prioritizing a plurality of automating features for the presenting step in order of decreasing generality or persistence of the results of the automating feature if there are a plurality of templates that match the monitored manipulation of the input device, and wherein the presenting step displays the one of the plurality of automating features with the highest priority.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 5, wherein the presenting step displays a plurality of features.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
172 words
A method for checking for ambiguities and conflicts while an application program is operational on a general purpose computer comprising an input device, a central processing unit, a display device and memory means, said memory means including a plurality of feature templates, feature presentation and implementation routines, said method comprising the steps of: continuously monitoring and recording a first direct manipulation of an input device by a computer user and a context of the direct manipulation of the input device; continuously monitoring and recording a second direct manipulation of the input device in the same context; comparing the first and second direct manipulations and their contexts to a plurality of inconsistency templates, each of which corresponds to an inconsistency between first and second direct manipulations of the input device in a given context; and displaying the inconsistency that corresponds to one of the plurality of inconsistency templates if a match is found between the one of the plurality of inconsistency templates and the first and second direct manipulations in the comparing step.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
172 words
A method for checking for ambiguities and conflicts while an application program is operational on a general purpose computer comprising an input device, a central processing unit, a display device and memory means, said memory means including a plurality of feature templates, feature presentation and implementation routines, said method comprising the steps of: continuously monitoring and recording a first direct manipulation of an input device by a computer user and a context of the direct manipulation of the input device; continuously monitoring and recording a second direct manipulation of the input device in the same context; comparing the first and second direct manipulations and their contexts to a plurality of inconsistency templates, each of which corresponds to an inconsistency between first and second direct manipulations of the input device in a given context; and displaying the inconsistency that corresponds to one of the plurality of inconsistency templates if a match is found between the one of the plurality of inconsistency templates and the first and second direct manipulations in the comparing step.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 12, further comprising the steps of: prompting a user through the display device to resolve the inconsistency by choosing the first or second manipulations of the input device; and resolving the inconsistency by implementing the chosen first or second manipulation provided in response to the prompting step.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4899276A
Cited
US4789962A
Cited
US4648062A
Cited
US5029113A
Cited
US4964077A
Cited
US5040131A
Cited
US5157768A
Cited
US5287448A
Cited
EP0401975A2
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-02-06 | 1998-08-08 | 1999-02-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-02-06 | 2002-08-08 | 2003-02-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-02-06 | 2006-08-08 | 2007-02-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |