Patent US6034831A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6034831A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Dynamic reverse reassign apparatus and method for a data recording disk drive
Assignee: HGST Netherlands BV
•
Filing: 1997-05-09
•
Granted: 2000-03-07
•
Expires: 2017-05-09
Abstract
Abstract A data recording disk drive is provided with a reassignment architecture that employs both an "in-line" approach for small disk defects and an "off-site" reassignment for multiple-sector defects. As a further aspect of the invention, the defective sites that have been off-site reassigned are periodically reinspected to determine whether they in fact remain defective. If it is determined upon inspection that the defect is no longer present, the data in the off-site reassign area is returned to its original location, freeing spares for reuse. As a further aspect of the invention, reinspection is performed at disk drive spin-up or during idle periods.
Inventors
- 👤 Jeffrey J. Dobbek
- 👤 Mantle Man-Hon Yu
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 11:33
CPC Classifications
G; G11; G11B; G11B20/00; G11B20/10; G11B20/18; G11B20/1883; G11B19/00; G11B19/02; G11B19/04; G11B2020/1893; G11B2220/00; G11B2220/20; G11B2220/25; G11B2220/2508; G11B2220/2516
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 65
Claim 1
Independent Claim
156 words
A defect handling system for use in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, the system comprising: a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds a threshold size.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
156 words
A defect handling system for use in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, the system comprising: a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds a threshold size.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The system of claim 1, further comprising a defect table maintained by the first and second reassign systems for use in subsequent reading or writing at the defective region.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
27 words
The system of claim 2, further comprising a reassign table maintained by the second reassign system for use in subsequent reading or writing at the defective region.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The system of claim 2, wherein data is further subdivided into data sectors, and wherein the defect table includes an entry for each defective data sector.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
40 words
The system of claim 1, further comprising a first defect table maintained by the first reassign system and a second defect table maintained by the second reassign system, both for use in subsequent reading or writing at the defective region.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
49 words
The system of claim 5, wherein the data is further subdivided into data sectors, wherein the first table includes one entry for each defective sector reassigned by the first reassign system, and wherein the second table includes one entry for each defective region reassigned by the second reassign system.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
95 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the first reassign system further comprises: means for locating a nearest nondefective spare area in either direction from the defective region; means for reading all data located between the defective region and the nondefective spare area into a data buffer; means for rewriting the data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region and the buffered data to an area between the defective region and the nondefective spare area that includes the nondefective spare area, such that the original sequence of the rewritten data is preserved.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
The system of claim 7, further comprising means for reconstructing data previously written to a defective area.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
130 words
The system of claim 7, further comprising: means for detecting read errors when reading the data between the defective region and the nearest nondefective spare area, means for locating a next nearest nondefective spare area in the opposite direction from the nearest nondefective spare area, relative to the defective region, if the detecting means has detected a read error, means for reading all data located between the defective region and the next-nearest nondefective spare area into the data buffer, means for rewriting the data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region and the buffered data to an area between the defective region and the next-nearest nondefective spare area and including the next-nearest nondefective spare area, such that the original sequence of the rewritten data is preserved.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
29 words
The system of claim 1, wherein nondefective areas used by the second reassign system are located in an area of the disk reserved for use by the disk drive.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
13 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the threshold size is one data sector.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
75 words
The system of claim 1, further comprising, a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by the second reassign system to determine if the region is still defective; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
33 words
The system of claim 12, wherein defective regions are checked during an initialization sequence of the disk drive or during periods when the disk drive is not performing normal reading or writing operations.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
58 words
The system of claim 12, wherein the defect detection system maintains at least one defect table having an entry for each defective region identified for use in subsequent reading of reassigned data, and wherein if a defective region has been determined to no longer be defective, the entry corresponding to that defective region is removed from the table.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
23 words
The system of claim 14, wherein defects are checked at predetermined times by sequentially checking the defective regions entered in the defect table.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
85 words
The system of claim 12, wherein the first reassign system maintains a first defect table having an entry for each defective region not exceeding the threshold size, and wherein the second reassign system maintains a second defect table having an entry for each defective region exceeding the threshold size, both tables for use in subsequent reading of reassigned data, and wherein if a defective region has been determined to no longer be defective, the entry corresponding to that defective region is removed from the table.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system of claim 12, wherein the checking system checks each defective region a fixed number of times, thereafter designating the defective region irreversible.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
31 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the data storage disk comprises a plurality of servo sectors, and wherein the identified defective region comprises a data region following an unreadable servo sector.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
238 words
A defect handling system for use in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, the system comprising: a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds a threshold size; a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by the second reassign system to determine if the region is still defective, wherein the defect checking system only checks defective disk regions exceeding the threshold size; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
238 words
A defect handling system for use in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, the system comprising: a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds a threshold size; a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by the second reassign system to determine if the region is still defective, wherein the defect checking system only checks defective disk regions exceeding the threshold size; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
182 words
An article of manufacture for use in a defect handling system for use in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a read/write circuit including a transducer that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, the article of manufacture comprising computer readable storage media including a plurality of program logic instructions embedded therein that causes control circuitry to perform the steps of: detecting, from information provided by the read/write circuit, a defective region of the disk in a first track; determining, from information provided by the transducer, whether the defective region exceeds a threshold size; causing data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to be reassigned to a substantially adjacent nondefective region of the first track, if the length of the defect does not exceed the threshold size; and causing data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to be reassigned to a remote nondefective region outside the first track if the length of the defect exceeds the threshold size.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
182 words
An article of manufacture for use in a defect handling system for use in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a read/write circuit including a transducer that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, the article of manufacture comprising computer readable storage media including a plurality of program logic instructions embedded therein that causes control circuitry to perform the steps of: detecting, from information provided by the read/write circuit, a defective region of the disk in a first track; determining, from information provided by the transducer, whether the defective region exceeds a threshold size; causing data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to be reassigned to a substantially adjacent nondefective region of the first track, if the length of the defect does not exceed the threshold size; and causing data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to be reassigned to a remote nondefective region outside the first track if the length of the defect exceeds the threshold size.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
151 words
A disk drive, comprising: a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks; a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon; and a defect handling system, comprising, a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds the threshold size.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
151 words
A disk drive, comprising: a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks; a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon; and a defect handling system, comprising, a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds the threshold size.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
The disk drive of claim 1, further comprising a defect table maintained by the first and second reassign systems for use in subsequent reading or writing at the defective region.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
27 words
The disk drive of claim 22, wherein data is further subdivided into data sectors, and wherein the defect table includes an entry for each defective data sector.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
41 words
The disk drive of claim 21, further comprising a first defect table maintained by the first reassign system and a second defect table maintained by the second reassign system, both for use in subsequent reading or writing at the defective region.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
50 words
The disk drive of claim 24, wherein the data is further subdivided into data sectors, wherein the first table includes one entry for each defective sector reassigned by the first reassign system, and wherein the second table includes one entry for each defective region reassigned by the second reassign system.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
96 words
The disk drive of claim 21, wherein the first reassign system further comprises: means for locating a nearest nondefective spare area in either direction from the defective region; means for reading all data located between the defective region and the nondefective spare area into a data buffer; means for rewriting the data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region and the buffered data to an area between the defective region and the nondefective spare area and including the nondefective spare area, such that the original sequence of the rewritten data is preserved.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
18 words
The disk drive of claim 26, further comprising means for reconstructing data previously written to a defective area.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
131 words
The disk drive of claim 26, further comprising: means for detecting read errors when reading the data between the defective region and the nearest nondefective spare area, means for locating a next nearest nondefective spare area in the opposite direction from the nearest nondefective spare area, relative to the defective region, if the detecting means has detected a read error, means for reading all data located between the defective region and the next-nearest nondefective spare area into the data buffer, means for rewriting the data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region and the buffered data to an area between the defective region and the next-nearest nondefective spare area and including the next-nearest nondefective spare area, such that the original sequence of the rewritten data is preserved.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
21 words
The disk drive of claim 21, wherein the sequence of the reassign data relative to adjacent data is preserved after reassignment.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
30 words
The disk drive of claim 21, wherein nondefective areas used by the second reassign system are located in an area of the disk reserved for use by the disk drive.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
14 words
The disk drive of claim 21, wherein the threshold size is one data sector.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
76 words
The disk drive of claim 21, further comprising, a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by the second reassign system to determine if the region is still defective; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
34 words
The disk drive of claim 32, wherein defective regions are checked during an initialization sequence of the disk drive or during periods when the disk drive is not performing normal reading or writing operations.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
60 words
The disk drive of claim 32, wherein the defect detection system maintains at least one defect table having an entry for each defective region identified for use in subsequent reading of reassigned data, and wherein if a defective region has been determined to no longer be defective, the entry corresponding to that defective region is removed from the table entry.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
24 words
The disk drive of claim 34, wherein defects are checked at predetermined times by sequentially checking the defective regions entered in the defect table.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
87 words
The disk drive of claim 32, wherein the first reassign system maintains a first defect table having an entry for each defective region not exceeding the threshold size, and wherein the second reassign system maintains a second defect table having an entry for each defective region exceeding the threshold size, both tables for use in subsequent reading of reassigned data, and wherein if a defective region has been determined to no longer be defective, the entry corresponding to that defective region is removed from the table entry.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
25 words
The disk drive of claim 32, wherein the checking system checks each defective region a fixed number of times, thereafter designating the defective region irreversible.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
32 words
The disk drive of claim 21, wherein the data storage disk comprises a plurality of servo sectors, and wherein the identified defective region comprises a data region following an unreadable servo sector.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
233 words
A disk drive, comprising: a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks; a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon; and a defect handling system, comprising, a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds the threshold size; a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by the second reassign system to determine if the region is still defective wherein the defect checking system only checks defective disk regions exceeding the threshold size; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
233 words
A disk drive, comprising: a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks; a transducer assembly that is positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon; and a defect handling system, comprising, a defect detection system which receives information from the transducer, identifies therefrom a defective region of the disk in a first track and determines the size of the defective region; a first data reassign system which reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track, if the size of the defective region does not exceed a threshold size; and a second reassign system which, when selected, reassigns any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track if the size of the defective region exceeds the threshold size; a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by the second reassign system to determine if the region is still defective wherein the defect checking system only checks defective disk regions exceeding the threshold size; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 45
Independent Claim
130 words
A method for handling disk defects in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, comprising the steps of: from information provided by the transducer, identifying a defective region of the disk in a first track and determining the size of the defective region; if the defective region does not exceed a threshold size, reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track; and if the defective region exceeds the threshold size, reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track.
Claim 46
Independent Claim
130 words
A method for handling disk defects in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, comprising the steps of: from information provided by the transducer, identifying a defective region of the disk in a first track and determining the size of the defective region; if the defective region does not exceed a threshold size, reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track; and if the defective region exceeds the threshold size, reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 40, further comprising the step of maintaining a defect table for subsequent use in reading reassigned data.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 41, wherein data is further subdivided into data sectors, and wherein the defect table includes an entry for each defective data sector.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 40, further comprising the step of maintaining a first defect table for defective regions which do not exceed the threshold size, and maintaining a second defect table for defective regions exceeding the threshold size, both tables for subsequent use in reading or writing at the defective region.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 43, wherein the data is further subdivided into data sectors, wherein the first table includes one entry for each reassigned defective sector, and wherein the second table includes one entry for each reassigned defective region.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
97 words
The method of claim 40, wherein the step of reassigning defective regions which do not exceed the threshold size further comprises the steps of: locating a nearest nondefective area in either direction from the defective region; reading all data located between the defective region and the nondefective area into a data buffer; rewriting the data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region and the buffered data to an area between the defective region and the nondefective area and including the nondefective area, such that the original sequence of the rewritten data is preserved.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 45, further comprising the step of reconstructing any data previously written to the defective area.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
116 words
The method of claim 45, further comprising the steps of: detecting any read errors that occur when reading the data between the defective region and the nearest nondefective area, if a read error is detected, locating a next nearest nondefective area in the opposite direction from the nearest nondefective area, relative to the defective region, reading all data located between the defective region and the next-nearest nondefective area into the data buffer, rewriting the data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to defective region and the buffered data to an area between the defective region and the next-nearest nondefective area and including the nondefective area, such that the sequence of the reassigned data is preserved.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 40, wherein the sequence of the data to be reassigned by the first data reassign system is preserved relative to adjacent data.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 40, wherein nondefective areas used to reassign defects which exceed the threshold size are located in an area of the disk reserved for use by the disk drive.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 40, wherein the threshold size is one data sector.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method of claim 40, further comprising, a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by one of the first and second reassign systems to determine if the region is still defective; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 58
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 51, wherein defective regions are checked during an initialization sequence of the disk drive or during periods when the disk drive is not performing normal reading or writing operations.
Claim 59
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 51, wherein the defect detection system maintains at least one defect table having an entry for each defective region identified for use in subsequent reading of reassigned data, and wherein if a defective region has been determined to no longer be defective, the entry corresponding to that defective region is removed from the table entry.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 53, wherein defects are checked at predetermined times by sequentially checking the defective regions entered in the defect table.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim
86 words
The method of claim 51, wherein the first reassign system maintains a first defect table having an entry for each defective region not exceeding the threshold size, and wherein the second reassign system maintains a second defect table having an entry for each defective region exceeding the threshold size, both tables for use in subsequent reading of reassigned data, and wherein if a defective region has been determined to no longer be defective, the entry corresponding to that defective region is removed from the table entry.
Claim 62
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 51, wherein the checking system checks each defective region a fixed number of times, thereafter designating the defective region irreversible.
Claim 63
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 40, wherein the data storage disk comprises a plurality of servo sectors, and wherein the identified defective region comprises a data region following an unreadable servo sector.
Claim 64
Independent Claim
216 words
A method for handling disk defects in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, comprising the steps of: from information provided by the transducer, identifying a defective region of the disk in a first track and determining the size of the defective region; if the defective region does not exceed a threshold size, reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track; and if the defective region exceeds the threshold size reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track; a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by one of the first and second reassign systems to determine if the region is still defective wherein the defect checking system only checks defective disk regions exceeding the threshold size; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
Claim 65
Independent Claim
216 words
A method for handling disk defects in a disk drive having a data storage disk formatted with a plurality of tracks, and a transducer positionable relative to the disk for reading and writing data thereon, comprising the steps of: from information provided by the transducer, identifying a defective region of the disk in a first track and determining the size of the defective region; if the defective region does not exceed a threshold size, reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a substantially adjacent nondefective area of the first track; and if the defective region exceeds the threshold size reassigning any data previously written, or scheduled to be written, to the defective region to a remote nondefective area outside the first track; a defect checking system which reads a region of the disk previously identified as defective and reassigned by one of the first and second reassign systems to determine if the region is still defective wherein the defect checking system only checks defective disk regions exceeding the threshold size; and a reverse reassign system for moving data previously reassigned from the region back to the region if the defect checking system has determined that the region is no longer defective, thus freeing the nondefective area for use.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4498146A
Cited
US5047874A
Cited
US5513160A
Cited
US5202876A
Cited
US5258852A
Cited
EP0541219A1
Cited
US5303219A
Cited
US5235585A
Cited
US5526335A
Cited
US5418767A
Cited
US5822142A
Cited
US5844911A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-03-07 | 2003-09-06 | 2004-03-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-03-07 | 2007-09-06 | 2008-03-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-03-07 | 2011-09-06 | 2012-03-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |