Patent US5848115A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5848115A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Computed tomography metrology
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1997-05-02
•
Granted: 1998-12-08
•
Expires: 2017-05-02
Abstract
Abstract The invention is a three-dimensional computed tomography method for inspecting and comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object. The method includes the following steps: A) three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; B) processing the multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external boundaries of the object; and C) producing actual point cloud data from the actual boundary data. The method further includes comparing the actual point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data. The comparing may include outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data and the image may represent the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data. The image may be rotated to present the non-conformance from different viewpoints around the feature.
Inventors
- 👤 Francis H. Little
- 👤 John C. Janning
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 12:12
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T17/00; G01; G01N; G01N23/00; G01N23/02; G01N23/04; G01N23/046; G01N2223/00; G01N2223/40; G01N2223/419; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S378/00; Y10S378/901
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
71 words
A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising: three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; and producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
71 words
A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising: three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; and producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the predetermined data is computer aided design (CAD) data and registration is made to CAD coordinates of the predetermined data.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said comparing includes outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 5 wherein said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said outputting an image includes displaying the image on a color computer monitor.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said displaying the image includes displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 5 wherein the image is an image of an interior feature of the object.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 9 wherein said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 10 wherein said outputting an image includes displaying the image on a color computer monitor.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said displaying the image includes displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data of the interior feature of the object.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 3 further comprising comparing an actual geometric definition to a predetermined geometric definition of a feature of the object.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 13 wherein said comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition of the feature of the object comprises: generating a curve fitted geometry of the point cloud data representing the feature, calculating the actual geometric definition from the curve fitted geometry, and comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
190 words
A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising: three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data; comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data and outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data wherein the image is an image of an interior feature of the object; said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data and displaying the image on a color computer monitor by displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data of the interior feature of the object which is a core.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
190 words
A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising: three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data; comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data and outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data wherein the image is an image of an interior feature of the object; said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data and displaying the image on a color computer monitor by displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data of the interior feature of the object which is a core.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
185 words
A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising: three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data; comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data; and comparing an actual geometric definition to a predetermined geometric definition of a feature of the object by generating a curve fitted geometry of the point cloud data representing the feature, calculating the actual geometric definition from the curve fitted geometry, and comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition wherein the object is a cooled turbine airfoil having at least one plurality of turbine cooling holes extending from an internal cavity through an outer wall of the airfoil.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
185 words
A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising: three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data; comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data; and comparing an actual geometric definition to a predetermined geometric definition of a feature of the object by generating a curve fitted geometry of the point cloud data representing the feature, calculating the actual geometric definition from the curve fitted geometry, and comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition wherein the object is a cooled turbine airfoil having at least one plurality of turbine cooling holes extending from an internal cavity through an outer wall of the airfoil.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 16 wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data further comprises generating a curve fitted geometry of the cooling holes by curve fitting a predetermined shape of each of the holes to the point cloud data representing the holes.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 17 wherein said each of said holes is axisymmetric having a predetermined axis and said predetermined axis is compared to an actual axis calculated from geometry of the curve fitted geometry.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition includes displaying images of said predetermined axis and said actual axis on a computer monitor.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 19 wherein said comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition further includes rotating the displayed images of the predetermined axis and the actual axis on a computer monitor to view nonconformance between the predetermined axis and the actual axis from different viewpoints around the cooling hole.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4600998A
Cited
US4422177A
Cited
US4729098A
Cited
US4969110A
Cited
US5027281A
Cited
US5119408A
Cited
US5345490A
Cited
US5452407A
Cited
US5414647A
Cited
US5442572A
Cited
US5621648A
Cited
US5559334A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-12-07 | 2002-06-08 | 2002-12-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-12-07 | 2006-06-08 | 2006-12-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-12-07 | 2010-06-08 | 2010-12-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |