US4969110A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of using a priori information in computerized tomography
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1988-08-01
•
Granted: 1990-11-06
•
Expires: 2008-08-01
Abstract
Abstract To improve computerized tomography (CT) imaging quality, a priori information of the test object is developed by probing the surfaces thereof at a multiplicity of points sufficient to spatially locate and define the envelope of the test object cross section to be imaged. A CT scan of the test object is then performed, and the CT image reconstructed therefrom is corrected with this a priori information. To expedite a priori information development, the convex hull of the test object is constructed from X-ray projection data and fitted with the probe developed measurement data to define the cross section envelope.
Inventors
- 👤 Francis H. Little
- 👤 David L. Hampson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 19:00
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T12/00; G06T12/30; G01; G01N; G01N23/00; G01N23/02; G01N23/04; G01N23/046; G01N2223/00; G01N2223/40; G01N2223/419; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S378/00; Y10S378/901
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
155 words
A method of reconstructing a computerized tomography (CT) image of a test object cross section comprising the steps of: A. supporting the test object in a test position; B. probing the test object at a multiplicity of exterior surface points in accordance with a predetermined mapping plan; C. developing measurement data locating the probed surface points in space; D. generating from the measurement data envelope boundary data defining the envelope of the test object cross section to be imaged; E. exposing the test object to X-rays at a multiplicity of projection angles to generate X-ray attenuation data at each projection angle; F. processing said X-ray attenuation data to reconstruct a CT image of the test object cross section; G. correcting the reconstructed image with said boundary data by limiting the application of said X-ray attenuation data to the test object cross section; and H. displaying a corrected, reconstructed image of the test object cross section.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
155 words
A method of reconstructing a computerized tomography (CT) image of a test object cross section comprising the steps of: A. supporting the test object in a test position; B. probing the test object at a multiplicity of exterior surface points in accordance with a predetermined mapping plan; C. developing measurement data locating the probed surface points in space; D. generating from the measurement data envelope boundary data defining the envelope of the test object cross section to be imaged; E. exposing the test object to X-rays at a multiplicity of projection angles to generate X-ray attenuation data at each projection angle; F. processing said X-ray attenuation data to reconstruct a CT image of the test object cross section; G. correcting the reconstructed image with said boundary data by limiting the application of said X-ray attenuation data to the test object cross section; and H. displaying a corrected, reconstructed image of the test object cross section.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein said corrected, reconstructed image is displayed on a pixel matrix display, said correcting step includes setting to zero said X-ray attenuation data allotted to those display pixels indicated by said boundary data to lie beyond the imaged cross section envelope of the test object.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method defined in claim 2, wherein said correcting step further includes resetting those pixels displaying the cross section image to the known density bounds of the test object.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method defined in claim 2, which further includes the steps of developing X-ray projection data defining the convex hull of the test object cross section, and selectively combining said X-ray projection data and said measurement data to generate said envelope defining boundary data.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method defined in claim 2, wherein said correcting step includes iteratively transforming said reconstructed CT image back and forth between object space and projection space, and correcting each image transformation to object space with said boundary data.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
228 words
A method of reconstructing a computerized tomography (CT) image of the cross section of a test object for portrayal on a pixel matrix display, said method comprising the steps of: A. supporting the test object in a test position; B. probing the concave exterior surface formations of the test object at a multiplicity of points to generate measurement data locating the probed concave surface points in space; C. scanning the test object at a multiplicity of projection angles to generate X-ray projection data at each projection angle defining the convex hull of the test object and to locate in space the convex surface formations of the test object; D. fitting said measurement data and X-ray projection data together to generate boundary data defining and locating in space the complete envelope of the test object cross section; E. exposing the test object to X-rays at a multiplicity of projection angles to generate X-ray attenuation data indicative of the density of the test object cross section at each projection angle; F. processing said X-ray attenuation data to reconstruct a CT image of the test object cross section; G. correcting said CT image with said boundary data by resetting to zero those display pixels located beyond said test object cross section envelope; and H. displaying a corrected, reconstructed CT image of the test object cross section on said pixel matrix display.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
228 words
A method of reconstructing a computerized tomography (CT) image of the cross section of a test object for portrayal on a pixel matrix display, said method comprising the steps of: A. supporting the test object in a test position; B. probing the concave exterior surface formations of the test object at a multiplicity of points to generate measurement data locating the probed concave surface points in space; C. scanning the test object at a multiplicity of projection angles to generate X-ray projection data at each projection angle defining the convex hull of the test object and to locate in space the convex surface formations of the test object; D. fitting said measurement data and X-ray projection data together to generate boundary data defining and locating in space the complete envelope of the test object cross section; E. exposing the test object to X-rays at a multiplicity of projection angles to generate X-ray attenuation data indicative of the density of the test object cross section at each projection angle; F. processing said X-ray attenuation data to reconstruct a CT image of the test object cross section; G. correcting said CT image with said boundary data by resetting to zero those display pixels located beyond said test object cross section envelope; and H. displaying a corrected, reconstructed CT image of the test object cross section on said pixel matrix display.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method defined in claim 6, wherein said probing step further includes probing said convex surface formations of the test object at a sufficient member of points to generate reference measurement data, and said fitting step uses said reference measurement data to spatially relate said X-ray projection data to said concave surface formation measurement data in generating said envelope-defining boundary data of the test object cross section.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method defined in claim 7, wherein said correcting step further includes resetting those pixels displaying the cross section image to the known density bounds of the test object.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method defined in claim 8, wherein said correcting step includes iteratively transforming said reconstructed CT image back and forth between object space and projection space, and correcting each transformation to object space with said boundary data and the density bounds of the test object.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4303829A
Cited
US4375696A
Cited
US4384209A
Cited
US4506327A
Cited
US4582993A
Cited
US4672650A
Cited
GB2192120A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-11-05 | 1994-05-07 | 1994-11-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-11-05 | 1998-05-07 | 1998-11-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-11-05 | 2002-05-07 | 2002-11-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |