Patent US5835891A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5835891A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Device modeling using non-parametric statistical determination of boundary data vectors

Assignee: Keysight Technologies Inc
•
Filing: 1997-02-06
•
Granted: 1998-11-10
•
Expires: 2017-02-06
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, an electronic component is modeled. Performance of the electronic component is measured to produce a plurality of data vectors representing actual performance of the electronic component. Boundary vectors are selected from the plurality of data vectors. A density estimate is calculated for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors. A first selected number of the data vectors are partitioned from the plurality of data vectors into a partitioned group. The partitioned group includes the first selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors with greatest density estimates. A second selected number of the partitioned group is selected as candidates for boundary vectors. The candidates for boundary vectors include the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates. The boundary vectors are selected from the candidates for boundary vectors. From the boundary vectors, values are calculated for boundary model parameter vectors which model the electronic component. The nominal vector is chosen from the plurality of data vectors as the one with the highest density estimate.

Inventors

  • 👤 Danny E. Stoneking

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 23:43
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/317; G01R31/3181; G01R31/3185; G01R31/318533; G01R31/318583

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim 181 words
A method for modeling an electronic component comprising the following steps: (a) measuring performance of the electronic component to produce a plurality of data vectors representing actual performance of the electronic component; (b) selecting boundary vectors from the plurality of data vectors, including using a computing system to perform the following substeps: (b.1) calculating a density estimate for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors, (b.2) partitioning a first selected number of the data vectors from the plurality of data vectors into a partitioned group, the partitioned group including the first selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors with greatest density estimates, as determined in substep (b.1), (b.3) selecting a second selected number of the partitioned group as candidates for boundary vectors, the candidates for boundary vectors including the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates, as determined in substep (b.1), and (b.4) selecting the boundary vectors from the candidates for boundary vectors; and, (c) from the boundary vectors, calculating values for boundary model parameter vectors which model the electronic component.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 181 words
A method for modeling an electronic component comprising the following steps: (a) measuring performance of the electronic component to produce a plurality of data vectors representing actual performance of the electronic component; (b) selecting boundary vectors from the plurality of data vectors, including using a computing system to perform the following substeps: (b.1) calculating a density estimate for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors, (b.2) partitioning a first selected number of the data vectors from the plurality of data vectors into a partitioned group, the partitioned group including the first selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors with greatest density estimates, as determined in substep (b.1), (b.3) selecting a second selected number of the partitioned group as candidates for boundary vectors, the candidates for boundary vectors including the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates, as determined in substep (b.1), and (b.4) selecting the boundary vectors from the candidates for boundary vectors; and, (c) from the boundary vectors, calculating values for boundary model parameter vectors which model the electronic component.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 66 words
A method as in claim 1 additionally comprising the following steps: (d) from the density estimate for each data vector calculated in substep (b.1), selecting a nominal data vector as a data vector from the plurality of data vectors which has a highest density estimate; and, (e) from the nominal data vector, calculating a value for a nominal model parameter vector which models the electronic component.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 122 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein substep (b.1) comprises performing the following substeps for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors, for the performance of the following substeps, each data vector being a current data vector: (b.1.1) locating a third selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors which are nearest to the current data vector; (b.1.2) calculating an average distance from the current data vector to each of the third selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors which are nearest to the current data vector found in substep (b.1.1); and, (b.1.3) estimating a density estimate for the current data vector as one divided by the average distance calculated in substep (b.1.2).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 31 words
A method as in claim 3 wherein in substep (b.1.1) the third selected number is equal to a total number of data vectors in the plurality of data vectors minus one.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 44 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein step (b) additionally comprises the following substep performed before substep (b.1): scaling vector components of all data vectors within the plurality of data vectors so that the plurality of data vectors are bounded by a unit hypercube.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein substep (b.4) includes selecting all the candidates for the boundary vectors as the boundary vectors.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 104 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein substep (b.4) comprises the following substeps: (b.4.1) for all possible pairings of the candidates for boundary vectors, selecting a pairing of candidates for boundary vectors which are closest together; (b.4.2) removing, from the candidates, a candidate from the pairing of candidates selected in substep (b.4.1) which has a higher density estimate as calculated in substep (b.1); (b.4.3) for candidates remaining after performance of substep (b.4.2), repeating substeps (b.4.1) and (b.4.2) until a number of remaining candidates is equal to a third selected number; and, (b.4.4) selecting the third selected number of remaining candidates as the boundary vectors.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 192 words
A method for modeling an electronic component comprising the following steps: (a) measuring performance of the electronic component to produce a plurality of data vectors representing actual performance of the electronic component; (b) from the plurality of data vectors, calculating values for a plurality of model parameter vectors which model the electronic component; and, (c) selecting boundary vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors, including using a computing system to perform the following substeps: (c.1) calculating a density estimate for each model parameter vector in the plurality of model parameter vectors, (c.2) partitioning a first selected number of the model parameter vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors into a partitioned group, the partitioned group including the first selected number of model parameter vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors with greatest density estimates, as determined in substep (c.1), (c.3) selecting a second selected number of the partitioned group as candidates for boundary vectors, the candidates for boundary vectors including the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates, as determined in substep (c.1), and (c.4) selecting the boundary vectors from the candidates for boundary vectors.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 192 words
A method for modeling an electronic component comprising the following steps: (a) measuring performance of the electronic component to produce a plurality of data vectors representing actual performance of the electronic component; (b) from the plurality of data vectors, calculating values for a plurality of model parameter vectors which model the electronic component; and, (c) selecting boundary vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors, including using a computing system to perform the following substeps: (c.1) calculating a density estimate for each model parameter vector in the plurality of model parameter vectors, (c.2) partitioning a first selected number of the model parameter vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors into a partitioned group, the partitioned group including the first selected number of model parameter vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors with greatest density estimates, as determined in substep (c.1), (c.3) selecting a second selected number of the partitioned group as candidates for boundary vectors, the candidates for boundary vectors including the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates, as determined in substep (c.1), and (c.4) selecting the boundary vectors from the candidates for boundary vectors.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as in claim 8 additionally comprising the following steps: (d) from the density estimate for each model parameter vector calculated in substep (c.1), selecting a nominal model parameter vector as a model parameter vector from the plurality of model parameter vectors which has a highest density estimate.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 134 words
A method as in claim 8 wherein substep (c.1) comprises performing the following substeps for each model parameter vector in the plurality of model parameter vectors, for the performance of the following substeps, each model parameter vector being a current model parameter vector: (c.1.1) locating a third selected number of model parameter vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors which are nearest to the current model parameter vector; (c.1.2) calculating an average distance from the current model parameter vector to each of the third selected number of model parameter vectors from the plurality of model parameter vectors which are nearest to the current model parameter vector found in substep (c.1.1); and, (c.1.3) estimating a density estimate for the current model parameter vector as one divided by the average distance calculated in substep (c.1.2).
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 33 words
A method as in claim 10 wherein in substep (c.1.1) the third selected number is equal to a total number of model parameter vectors in the plurality of model parameter vectors minus one.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method as in claim 8 wherein step (c) additionally comprises the following substep performed before substep (c.1): scaling vector components of all model parameter vectors within the plurality of model parameter vectors so that the plurality of model parameter vectors are bounded by a unit hypercube.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 104 words
A method as in claim 8 wherein substep (c.4) comprises the following substeps: (c.4.1) for all possible pairings of the candidates for boundary vectors, selecting a pairing of candidates for boundary vectors which are closest together; (c.4.2) removing, from the candidates, a candidate from the pairing of candidates selected in substep (c.4.1) which has a higher density estimate as calculated in substep (c.1); (c.4.3) for candidates remaining after performance of substep (c.4.2), repeating substeps (c.4.1) and (c.4.2) until a number of remaining candidates is equal to a third selected number; and, (c.4.4) selecting the third selected number of remaining candidates as the boundary vectors.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 157 words
Computer Readable Storage media which stores software for generating boundary vectors from a data set consisting of a plurality of data vectors, the software when executed on a computing system comprising: calculating means for calculating a density estimate for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors; partitioning means for partitioning a first selected number of the data vectors from the plurality of data vectors into a partitioned group, the partitioned group including the first selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors with greatest density estimates, as determined by the calculating means; number selecting means for selecting a second selected number of the partitioned group as candidates for the boundary vectors, the candidates for the boundary vectors including the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates, as determined by the calculating means; and, vector selecting means for selecting the boundary vectors from the candidates for the boundary vectors.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 157 words
Computer Readable Storage media which stores software for generating boundary vectors from a data set consisting of a plurality of data vectors, the software when executed on a computing system comprising: calculating means for calculating a density estimate for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors; partitioning means for partitioning a first selected number of the data vectors from the plurality of data vectors into a partitioned group, the partitioned group including the first selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors with greatest density estimates, as determined by the calculating means; number selecting means for selecting a second selected number of the partitioned group as candidates for the boundary vectors, the candidates for the boundary vectors including the second selected number of the partitioned group with lowest density estimates, as determined by the calculating means; and, vector selecting means for selecting the boundary vectors from the candidates for the boundary vectors.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 99 words
Storage media as in claim 14 wherein, for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors in turn being a current vector, the calculating means: locates a third selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors which are nearest to the current data vector, calculates an average distance from the current data vector to each of the third selected number of data vectors from the plurality of data vectors which are nearest to the current data vector, and estimates a density estimate for the current data vector as one divided by the calculated average distance.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 28 words
Storage media as in claim 15 wherein the third selected number is equal to a total number of data vectors in the plurality of data vectors minus one.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 14 words
Storage media as in claim 14 wherein the calculating means utilizes a K-D tree.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 68 words
Storage media as in claim 14, wherein the software, when executed on a computing system, additionally comprises: scaling means for scaling vector components of all data vectors within the plurality of data vectors so that the plurality of data vectors are bounded by a unit hypercube, the scaling being performed before the calculating means calculates the density estimate for each data vector in the plurality of data vectors.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 23 words
Storage media as in claim 14 wherein the vector selecting means selects all the candidates for the boundary vectors as the boundary vectors.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 108 words
Storage media as in claim 14 wherein the vector selecting means includes: selecting means for selecting, for all possible pairings of the candidates for boundary vectors, a pairing of candidates for boundary vectors which are closest together; and, removing means for removing, from the candidates, a candidate from the pairing of selected candidates which has a higher density estimate as calculated by the calculating means; wherein the selecting means selects pairs of candidates and the removing means removes candidates until a number of remaining candidates is equal to a third selected number, the vector selecting means selecting the third selected number of remaining candidates as the boundary vectors.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4571697A Cited
US5027353A Cited
US5187712A Cited
US5638489A Cited
US5414716A Cited
US5485471A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2001-11-09 2002-05-11 2002-11-10 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2005-11-09 2006-05-11 2006-11-10 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2009-11-09 2010-05-11 2010-11-10 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag