US5825482A — Surface inspection system with misregistration er…

Claim 1

Independent Claim 129 words

A method for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said method comprising the steps of: generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of locations of the sample; defining one-dimensional groups of data samples, and each group of data samples or portion thereof defining a vector; for at least one vector, providing a reference vector that is an average of selected vectors of data samples; and processing the at least one vector and the reference vector to correct for misregistration.

Claim 2

Independent Claim 129 words

A method for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said method comprising the steps of: generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of locations of the sample; defining one-dimensional groups of data samples, and each group of data samples or portion thereof defining a vector; for at least one vector, providing a reference vector that is an average of selected vectors of data samples; and processing the at least one vector and the reference vector to correct for misregistration.

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 21 words

The method of claim 1, said defining step defining each group of data samples to be a row of data samples.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 21 words

The method of claim 2, said providing step providing said reference vector by computing a weighted average of said selected vectors.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 39 words

The method of claim 2, said processing step being performed on data samples within a window along said at least one vector, said window containing the same or fewer number of data samples than the at least one vector.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 27 words

The method of claim 4, said at least one vector having a number of data samples, said number being in the range of about 512 to 8192.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 44 words

The method of claim 1, said processing step comprising processing different sets of data samples of said reference vector, or signals derived therefrom, wherein at least some data samples in such sets are offset from the data samples of the at least one vector.

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 53 words

The method of claim 6, said defining step defining each group of data samples to be a row of data samples, wherein at least one of the sets of data samples of the reference vector is offset by one or more columns relative to the data samples in the at least one vector.

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 37 words

The method of claim 6, wherein the processing step comprises crosscorrelating each set of data samples of said reference vector with said at least one vector to obtain a crosscorrelation coefficient corresponding to each of the sets.

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 27 words

The method of claim 8, wherein the processing step derives a maximum value of the correlation coefficient for each data sample in the at least one vector.

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 59 words

The method of claim 9, further comprising re-positioning each of at least some data samples of the at least one vector so that it is identified by the location, in the two-dimensional array of data samples, of the corresponding data sample in the set of data samples in the reference vector for which the corresponding crosscorrelation coefficient is maximum.

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 30 words

The method of claim 6, wherein the processing step comprises computing a residual value between each set of data samples of said reference vector and said at least one vector.

Claim 13

Dependent Claim 22 words

The method of claim 11, further comprising comparing the residual values to obtain an offset value corresponding to a minimum residual value.

Claim 14

Dependent Claim 60 words

The method of claim 11, further comprising normalizing the data samples of said reference vector and of the at least one vector prior to the computing step, wherein the computing step computes a sum of differences between data samples of each of said sets of said normalized reference vector and the data samples of said normalized at least one vector.

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 34 words

The method of claim 2, said obtaining step deriving the reference vector from selected vectors comprising data samples that are in different rows but the same columns in the two-dimensional array of data samples.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 103 words

The method of claim 14, said providing step providing a reference vector G i , j given by: ##EQU10## where Y i , j is the data sample value at the ith row, jth column of the two-dimensional array; D q are weighting coefficients; H is the number of said selected vectors for generation of the reference vector; G i , j is the value of the reference vector at the ith row jth column of the two-dimensional array; where j ranges from (N/2-1) to -N/2 so that the at least one vector, reference vector and selected vectors each has N data samples.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 125 words

The method of claim 15, said processing step including crosscorrelating selected data samples of the at least one vector with selected sets of data samples of the reference vector according to the following equations: ##EQU11## where A is a size of a window within which averaging is performed; and Y i ,j, G i ,j are the averaged values of Y i ,j, G i ,j within the window of width A; ##EQU12## where C i , j (m) is a crosscorrelation coefficient at the ith row and jth column when the reference vector is in the same row but offset by m data samples relative to the at least one vector; and W is a size of a correlation window for the crosscorrelation coefficient.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 24 words

The method of claim 16, wherein W includes a number of data samples, said number being in the range of about 4 to 64.

Claim 19

Dependent Claim 55 words

The method of claim 2, said generating step generating sequentially rows of said data samples and the at least one vector and the reference vector, wherein said providing step comprises causing a relative time delay between a set of data samples of the reference vector and selected data samples of the at least one vector.

Claim 20

Dependent Claim 23 words

The method of claim 2, further comprising repeating the providing and processing steps for a plurality of different vectors in the two-dimensional array.

Claim 21

Dependent Claim 26 words

The method of claim 19, wherein at least two of the plurality of vectors are in the same row and are each shorter than the row.

Claim 22

Dependent Claim 81 words

The method of claim 19, wherein the processing step re-positions at least some data samples in each of at least some of the plurality of vectors in the two-dimensional array so that it is identified by the location, in the two-dimensional array of data samples, of a corresponding set of data samples in the reference vector, and derives at least one reference vector from one or more re-positioned vectors when the providing and processing steps are repeated in a recursive operation.

Claim 23

Dependent Claim 86 words

The method of claim 19, wherein the processing step re-positions at least some data samples in each of at least some of the plurality of vectors in the two-dimensional array so that it is identified by the location, in the two-dimensional array of data samples, of a corresponding set of data samples of the reference vector, wherein the processing step derives a reference vector from one or more vectors that have not been re-positioned when the providing and processing steps are repeated in a non-recursive operation.

Claim 24

Dependent Claim 83 words

The method of claim 1, wherein the processing step compares at least some data samples of the at least one vector and those of the reference vector to select data samples of the reference vector that best match the those of the at least some data samples of the at least one vector according to a criterion and the offset there between, said method further comprising re-positioning said at least some data samples in the at least one vector according to said offset.

Claim 25

Dependent Claim 24 words

The method of claim 23, further comprising repeating the providing, processing and re-positioning steps for a plurality of different vectors in the two-dimensional array.

Claim 26

Dependent Claim 40 words

The method of claim 2, said system illuminating the surface of the specimen by scanning a light beam along the rows of locations, wherein said generating step generates the data samples by detecting light scattered or reflected by the surface.

Claim 27

Dependent Claim 36 words

The method of claim 25, said method further comprising detecting the light scattered or reflected by the surface and modifying intensity of the light beam in response to the scattered or reflected light that is detected.

Claim 28

Dependent Claim 20 words

The method of claim 25, said detecting step including increasing contrast from any pattern on the surface of the specimen.

Claim 29

Dependent Claim 42 words

The method of claim 25, said light beam having a point spread function, wherein said providing step provides said reference vector by computing a weighted average of vectors with weights that are functions of the point spread function of the light beam.

Claim 30

Dependent Claim 39 words

The method of claim 2, further comprising collecting intensity values related to light modified by the specimen at a plurality of sites, wherein said generating step includes interpolating said intensity values to obtain said two-dimensional array of data samples.

Claim 31

Independent Claim 164 words

A method for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said method comprising the steps of: generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of locations; comparing the data samples of a target subarray and the data samples of each of a plurality of reference subarrays, or between signals derived therefrom, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples to select a pair of offset values; and repositioning the target subarray according to the pair of offset values.

Claim 32

Independent Claim 164 words

A method for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said method comprising the steps of: generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of locations; comparing the data samples of a target subarray and the data samples of each of a plurality of reference subarrays, or between signals derived therefrom, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples to select a pair of offset values; and repositioning the target subarray according to the pair of offset values.

Claim 33

Dependent Claim 55 words

The method of claim 30, said comparing step including computing a residual value between the data samples of a target subarray and the data samples of each of a plurality of reference subarrays, or between signals derived therefrom, to obtain a plurality of residual values each corresponding to one of said plurality of reference subarrays.

Claim 34

Dependent Claim 35 words

The method of claim 31, said comparing step including determining a pair of offset values corresponding to a minimum residual value, said re-positioning step repositioning the target subarray according to such pair of offset values.

Claim 35

Dependent Claim 58 words

The method of claim 31, said computing step also including deriving a normalized target subarray from said target subarray and deriving a plurality of normalized reference subarrays from said plurality of reference subarrays, wherein the residual values are obtained by calculating the residual value between the normalized target subarray and each of the plurality of normalized reference subarrays.

Claim 36

Dependent Claim 34 words

The method of claim 33, said deriving step including calculating, for each of at least some of the data samples in the target subarray and/or reference subarrays, a corresponding average value of data samples.

Claim 37

Dependent Claim 42 words

The method of claim 34, said deriving step including dividing each of at least some of such data samples or signals derived therefrom in a target or reference subarray by its corresponding average value to obtain said normalized target or reference subarray.

Claim 38

Dependent Claim 54 words

The method of claim 35, said deriving step including subtracting from each of at least some of such data samples in a target or reference subarray a fraction of its corresponding average value to obtain a difference and dividing such difference by its corresponding average value to obtain said normalized target or reference subarray.

Claim 39

Dependent Claim 24 words

The method of claim 35, said calculating step calculating the corresponding average value of data samples that is a weighted average of data samples.

Claim 40

Dependent Claim 48 words

The method of claim 37, wherein said calculating step calculates, for each of at least some of the data samples in the target subarray and/or reference subarrays, a corresponding average value of data samples in a number of rows and a number of columns from such data sample.

Claim 41

Dependent Claim 71 words

The method of claim 38, said system illuminating the surface of the specimen by scanning a light beam along the rows of locations, said light beam characterized by a point spread function having a lateral extent, said data samples in said number of rows and said number of columns from which said corresponding average value is calculated are within the lateral extent of the point spread function of the light beam.

Claim 42

Dependent Claim 142 words

The method of claim 35, said deriving step deriving the normalized target subarray from said target subarray and the plurality of normalized reference subarrays from said plurality of reference subarrays according to the following equations: ##EQU13## Where R N i , j, T N i , j are the normalized values respectively of the data samples at the ith row and jth column of the reference and target subarrays, R i , j, T i , j are the values respectively of the data samples at the ith row and jth column of the reference and target subarrays, α T , α R being weighting factors, and R i ,j, T i , j are local average values of the data samples over the reference and target subarrays respectively that are given by: ##EQU14## where K is size of an averaging window.

Claim 43

Dependent Claim 118 words

The method of claim 40, wherein said residual value is computed according to the following equation: ##EQU15## where M is the number of data samples in each column of the reference and target subarrays; N is the number of data samples in each row of the reference and target subarrays; m is the number of columns by which the reference subarray is offset from the reference position, where m can be zero; n is the number of rows by which the reference subarray is offset from the reference position, where n can be zero; and H(n,m) is the residual value corresponding to a reference subarray that is shifted by n rows and m columns from the reference position.

Claim 44

Dependent Claim 39 words

The method of claim 30, further comprising collecting intensity values related to light modified by the specimen at a plurality of sites, wherein said generating step includes interpolating said intensity values to obtain said two-dimensional array of data samples.

Claim 45

Independent Claim 166 words

A method for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said method comprising the steps of: generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in a row and column of locations; crosscorrelating a target subarray and each of a plurality of reference subarrays of data samples, or signals derived therefrom, to obtain a plurality of sets of crosscorrelation values, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples; and selecting the reference subarray that corresponds to a set of crosscorrelation values according to a criterion.

Claim 46

Independent Claim 166 words

A method for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said method comprising the steps of: generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in a row and column of locations; crosscorrelating a target subarray and each of a plurality of reference subarrays of data samples, or signals derived therefrom, to obtain a plurality of sets of crosscorrelation values, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples; and selecting the reference subarray that corresponds to a set of crosscorrelation values according to a criterion.

Claim 47

Dependent Claim 48 words

The method of claim 43, further comprising deriving a normalized target subarray from said target subarray and deriving a plurality of normalized reference subarrays from said plurality of reference subarrays, wherein the crosscorrelating step crosscorrelates the normalized target subarray and each of the plurality of normalized reference subarrays.

Claim 48

Dependent Claim 34 words

The method of claim 44, said deriving step including calculating, for each of at least some of the data samples in the target subarray and/or reference subarrays, a corresponding average value of data samples.

Claim 49

Dependent Claim 42 words

The method of claim 45, said deriving step including dividing each of at least some of such data samples or signals derived therefrom in a target or reference subarray by its corresponding average value to obtain said normalized target or reference subarray.

Claim 50

Dependent Claim 54 words

The method of claim 46, said deriving step including subtracting from each of at least some of such data samples in a target or reference subarray a fraction of its corresponding average value to obtain a difference and dividing such difference by its corresponding average value to obtain said normalized target or reference subarray.

Claim 51

Dependent Claim 24 words

The method of claim 46, said calculating step calculating the corresponding average value of data samples that is a weighted average of data samples.

Claim 52

Dependent Claim 48 words

The method of claim 48, wherein said calculating step calculates, for each of at least some of the data samples in the target subarray and/or reference subarrays, a corresponding average value of data samples in a number of rows and a number of columns from such data sample.

Claim 53

Dependent Claim 75 words

The method of claim 49, said system illuminating the surface of the specimen by scanning a light beam across the rows of locations in a raster pattern, said light beam characterized by a point spread function having a lateral extent, said data samples in said number of rows and said number of columns from which said corresponding average value is calculated are within the lateral extent of the point spread function of the light beam.

Claim 54

Dependent Claim 149 words

The method of claim 47, said deriving step deriving the normalized target subarray from said target subarray and the plurality of normalized reference subarrays from said plurality of reference subarrays according to the following equations: ##EQU16## where R N i , j, T N i , j are the normalized values respectively of the data samples at the ith row and jth column of the reference and target subarrays, R i , j, T i , j are the values respectively of the data samples at the ith row and jth column of the reference and target subarrays, α T , α R being weighting factors, and R i , j, T i ,j are local average values for the ith row and jth column of the data samples over the reference and target subarrays respectively that are given by: ##EQU17## where K is size of an averaging window.

Claim 55

Dependent Claim 78 words

The method of claim 51, wherein said crosscorrelation values are computed according to the following equation: ##EQU18## where W is the crosscorrelation window in the ±Y direction and V is the crosscorrelation window in the ±X direction; where m is the number of columns offset from the reference position; n is the number of rows offset from the reference position; and C i ,j (n,m) is a correlation coefficient at data sample position (i,j) at offsets n, m.

Claim 56

Dependent Claim 21 words

The method of claim 43, said selecting step selecting the reference subarray that corresponds to a maximum set of crosscorrelation values.

Claim 57

Dependent Claim 39 words

The method of claim 43, further comprising collecting intensity values related to light modified by the specimen at a plurality of sites, wherein said generating step includes interpolating said intensity values to obtain said two-dimensional array of data samples.

Claim 58

Independent Claim 83 words

A method for detecting anomalies in the specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said method comprising the steps of: scanning a light beam across the specimen along scan lines; detecting light originating from the light beam after such light has been modified by the specimen for detecting anomalies in the specimen; and controlling intensity of the light beam as a function of reference data to correct for variations in the detected light caused by optical characteristics of the specimen apart from the anomalies.

Claim 59

Independent Claim 83 words

A method for detecting anomalies in the specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said method comprising the steps of: scanning a light beam across the specimen along scan lines; detecting light originating from the light beam after such light has been modified by the specimen for detecting anomalies in the specimen; and controlling intensity of the light beam as a function of reference data to correct for variations in the detected light caused by optical characteristics of the specimen apart from the anomalies.

Claim 60

Dependent Claim 35 words

The method of claim 55, further comprising storing signals representative of light that is detected in the detecting step, said controlling step controlling intensity of the light beam as a function of said stored signals.

Claim 61

Dependent Claim 83 words

The method of claim 55, said detecting step detecting a peak value and/or an integrated or average value of the intensity of the light modified by the specimen along a first scan line, said controlling step controlling intensity of the light beam in response to light detected in the detecting step for scanning a second scan line according to the peak value and/or the integrated or average value of the intensity of the light modified by the specimen along the first scan line.

Claim 62

Dependent Claim 29 words

The method of claim 55, said scanning step employing an acousto-optic deflector, said controlling step applying to the acousto-optic deflector a signal that is a function of the data.

Claim 63

Independent Claim 85 words

An apparatus for detecting anomalies in the specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, comprising: means for scanning a light beam across the specimen along scan lines; a detector device detecting light originating from the light beam after such light has been modified by the specimen for detecting anomalies in the specimen; and means for controlling intensity of the light beam as a function of reference data to correct for variations in the detected light caused by optical characteristics of the specimen apart from the anomalies.

Claim 64

Independent Claim 85 words

An apparatus for detecting anomalies in the specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, comprising: means for scanning a light beam across the specimen along scan lines; a detector device detecting light originating from the light beam after such light has been modified by the specimen for detecting anomalies in the specimen; and means for controlling intensity of the light beam as a function of reference data to correct for variations in the detected light caused by optical characteristics of the specimen apart from the anomalies.

Claim 65

Dependent Claim 37 words

The apparatus of claim 59, further comprising a storage storing signals representative of light that is detected by the detector device, said controlling means controlling intensity of the light beam as a function of said stored signals.

Claim 66

Dependent Claim 83 words

The apparatus of claim 59, said detector device detecting a peak value and/or an integrated or average value of the intensity of the light modified by the specimen along a first scan line, said controlling means controlling intensity of the light beam in response to light detected by the detector device for scanning a second scan line according to the peak value and/or the integrated or average value of the intensity of the light modified by the specimen along the first scan line.

Claim 67

Dependent Claim 29 words

The apparatus of claim 59, said scanning means including an acousto-optic deflector, said controlling means applying to the acousto-optic deflector a signal that is a function of the data.

Claim 68

Independent Claim 138 words

An apparatus for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said apparatus comprising: means for generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of locations of the data sample; means for defining one-dimensional groups of data samples, each group of data samples or portion thereof defining a vector; means for providing a reference vector that is an average of selected vectors of data samples for at least one vector in the two-dimensional array; and means for processing the at least one vector and the reference vector to correct for misregistration.

Claim 69

Independent Claim 138 words

An apparatus for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said apparatus comprising: means for generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of locations of the data sample; means for defining one-dimensional groups of data samples, each group of data samples or portion thereof defining a vector; means for providing a reference vector that is an average of selected vectors of data samples for at least one vector in the two-dimensional array; and means for processing the at least one vector and the reference vector to correct for misregistration.

Claim 70

Dependent Claim 24 words

The apparatus of claim 63, said defining means comprising means for defining each group of data samples to be a row of data samples.

Claim 71

Dependent Claim 63 words

The apparatus of claim 64, wherein said generating means generates the rows of data samples sequentially, said processing means comprising: two signal processing paths for processing the rows of data samples; and time delay means for introducing a time delay between the two signal processing paths in order to cause a time shift between the reference vector and the at least one vector.

Claim 72

Dependent Claim 62 words

The apparatus of claim 64, said processing means processing said at least one vector and a plurality of sets of data samples of the reference vector to obtain a plurality of offset values, said time delay means introducing different time delays between the two signal processing paths in order to generate said plurality of sets of data samples of the reference vector.

Claim 73

Independent Claim 168 words

An apparatus for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said apparatus comprising: means for generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the row and column of locations; means for comparing the data samples of a target subarray and the data samples of each of a plurality of reference subarrays, or between signals derived therefrom, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples to select a pair of offset values; and means for repositioning the target subarray according to the pair of offset values.

Claim 74

Independent Claim 168 words

An apparatus for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said apparatus comprising: means for generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in the row and column of locations; means for comparing the data samples of a target subarray and the data samples of each of a plurality of reference subarrays, or between signals derived therefrom, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples to select a pair of offset values; and means for repositioning the target subarray according to the pair of offset values.

Claim 75

Dependent Claim 57 words

The apparatus of claim 67, said comparing means including means for computing a residual value between the data samples of a target subarray and the data samples of each of a plurality of reference subarrays, or between signals derived therefrom, to obtain a plurality of residual values each corresponding to one of said plurality of reference subarrays.

Claim 76

Dependent Claim 53 words

The apparatus of claim 68, wherein said generating means generates the rows of data samples sequentially, said computing means comprising: two signal processing paths for processing the rows of data samples; and time delay means for introducing a time delay between the two signal processing paths in order to generate the reference subarrays.

Claim 77

Independent Claim 168 words

An apparatus for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said apparatus comprising: means for generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in a row and column of locations; means for crosscorrelating a target subarray and each of a plurality of reference subarrays of data, or signals derived therefrom, to obtain a plurality of sets of crosscorrelation values, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples; and means for selecting the reference subarray that corresponds to a set of crosscorrelation values according to a criterion.

Claim 78

Independent Claim 168 words

An apparatus for correcting misregistration errors in a system for detecting anomalies in a specimen such as a semiconductor wafer, said system illuminating a surface of the specimen at a two-dimensional array of locations in rows and columns; said apparatus comprising: means for generating a two-dimensional array of data samples in rows and columns, each data sample in a row and column representing light modified by the specimen at a corresponding location in a row and column of locations; means for crosscorrelating a target subarray and each of a plurality of reference subarrays of data, or signals derived therefrom, to obtain a plurality of sets of crosscorrelation values, the target and the reference subarrays having the same dimensions, one of the reference subarrays being at a reference position and the remaining reference subarrays being offset from the reference position by at least one row and/or column of data samples; and means for selecting the reference subarray that corresponds to a set of crosscorrelation values according to a criterion.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	2001-10-19	2002-04-20	2002-10-20	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	2005-10-19	2006-04-20	2006-10-20	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	2009-10-19	2010-04-20	2010-10-20	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Surface inspection system with misregistration error correction and adaptive illumination

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag