Patent US5808453A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5808453A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Synchronous current sharing pulse width modulator
Assignee: Vishay Siliconix Inc
•
Filing: 1996-08-21
•
Granted: 1998-09-15
•
Expires: 2016-08-21
Abstract
Abstract Multiple controllers connected in parallel to control external circuits such as dc-dc converters so that the external circuits supply power equally to a load such as a microprocessor. All of the controllers are connected and each controller includes an oscillator and a pulse width modulation circuit to synchronize the frequency of all of the oscillators such that the duty cycle of all the oscillators are equal. Each controller includes an over-current protection circuit and an over-voltage protection circuit which will cause the controller with a fault to discontinue supplying power to the load. Each controller further includes a circuit to adjust the duty cycle of the non-faulty controllers when a controller with a fault is caused to discontinue supplying power to the load.
Inventors
- 👤 Chae Lee
- 👤 Trang Minh Nguyen
- 👤 Robert Blattner
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 16:15
CPC Classifications
H; H02; H02J; H02J1/00; H02J1/10; H02J1/102
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 25
Claim 1
Independent Claim
117 words
A first controller and at least a second controller wherein the clock rates of the first controller and the at least a second controller are synchronized, comprising: a first oscillator in the first controller operating at a first frequency; a second oscillator in at least the second controller operating at a second frequency, wherein the second frequency is substantially equal to the first frequency; a first timing capacitor coupled to the first oscillator; a second timing capacitor coupled to the second oscillator; and a synchronization line connecting the first oscillator to the second oscillator causing each oscillator to operate at the same frequency by causing the first and second timing capacitors to discharge at the same time.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
117 words
A first controller and at least a second controller wherein the clock rates of the first controller and the at least a second controller are synchronized, comprising: a first oscillator in the first controller operating at a first frequency; a second oscillator in at least the second controller operating at a second frequency, wherein the second frequency is substantially equal to the first frequency; a first timing capacitor coupled to the first oscillator; a second timing capacitor coupled to the second oscillator; and a synchronization line connecting the first oscillator to the second oscillator causing each oscillator to operate at the same frequency by causing the first and second timing capacitors to discharge at the same time.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 1, wherein: the first controller further comprises an over-current protection circuit; and the at least a second controller further comprises an over-current protection circuit.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
32 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 2, wherein: the first controller further comprises an over-voltage protection circuit; and the second controller further comprises an over-voltage protection circuit.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
121 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 3, wherein: the first oscillator is associated with a resistor wherein the resistor and the timing capacitor in the first oscillator determine a time constant for the first oscillator; and the second oscillator is associated with a resistor wherein the resistor and timing capacitor in the second oscillator determine a time constant for the second oscillator; and wherein the resistor associated with the first oscillator and the timing capacitor in the first oscillator and the resistor associated with the second oscillator and the timing capacitor in the second oscillator are selected to make the time constant for the first oscillator and the time constant for the second oscillator substantially identical.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
53 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 4, wherein: the first controller is connected to a first circuit and controls the first circuit; and the second controller is connected to a second circuit and controls the second circuit wherein the first circuit is substantially identical to the second circuit.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
44 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 5, wherein: the first circuit includes a highside MOSFET which controls highside power supplied to a load; and the second circuit includes a highside MOSFET which controls highside power supplied to the load.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
74 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 6, wherein: the over-current protection circuit in the first controller includes a comparator to compare a reference voltage to the voltage at a source of the highside MOSFET in the first circuit; and the over-current protection circuit in the second controller includes a comparator to compare a reference voltage to a voltage at a source of the highside MOSFET in the second circuit.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
126 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 7, wherein: an output from the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the first controller causes the first circuit to discontinue supplying the load with power if the voltage at the source of the highside MOSFET in the first circuit exceeds the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the first controller; and an output from the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the second controller causes the second circuit to discontinue supplying the load with power if the voltage at the source of the highside MOSFET in the second circuit exceeds the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the second controller.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
158 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 8, wherein: the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the first controller is derived from a supply voltage supplied to a drain of the highside MOSFET in the first circuit, wherein the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the first controller is measured at a current sense pin on the first controller which is connected via a resistor to the supply voltage; and the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the second controller is derived from a supply voltage supplied to a drain of the highside MOSFET in the second circuit, wherein the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-current protection circuit in the second controller is measured at a current sense pin on the second controller which is connected via a resistor to the supply voltage.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
54 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 9, wherein: the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller includes a comparator to compare a feedback signal to a reference signal; and the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller includes a comparator to compare a feedback signal to a reference signal.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
132 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 10, wherein: an output from the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller causes the first circuit to discontinue supplying the load with power if the feedback voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller exceeds the reference signal applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller; and an output from the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller causes the second circuit to discontinue supplying the load with power if the feedback voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller exceeds the reference signal applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
70 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 11, wherein: the feedback voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller is derived from a voltage at an output of the first circuit; and the feedback voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller is derived from a voltage at an output of the second circuit.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
82 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 12, wherein: the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller is obtained from a voltage reference pin on the first controller which is increased by a preselected amount; and the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller is obtained from a voltage reference pin on the second controller which is increased by the preselected amount.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
132 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 13, wherein: an output from the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller causes the first circuit to discontinue supplying the load with power if the feedback voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller exceeds the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the first controller; and an output from the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller causes the second circuit to discontinue supplying the load with power if the feedback voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller exceeds the reference voltage applied to the comparator in the over-voltage protection circuit in the second controller.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
44 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 14, further comprising a pulse width modulation line connecting the first controller to the second controller causing the first controller and the at least a second controller to have the same duty cycle.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
50 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 15, wherein: the first controller further comprises a pulse width modulator section with an output to a logic control section; and the second controller further comprises a pulse width modulator section with an output to a logic control section.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
86 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 16, wherein: the logic control section in the first controller has an output to a gate of the highside MOSFET in the first circuit and an output to a gate of a lowside MOSFET in the first circuit; and the logic control section in the second controller has an output to a gate of the highside MOSFET in the second circuit and an output to a gate of a lowside MOSFET in the second circuit.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
56 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 17, wherein: the logic control section in the first controller has an enable input from a fault comparator section in the first controller; and the logic control section in the second controller has an enable input from a fault comparator section in the second controller.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
76 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 18, wherein: the pulse width modulation section in the first controller includes a comparator to compare an output from an error amplifier in the first controller with an output from the first oscillator; and the pulse width modulation section in the second controller includes a comparator to compare an output from an error amplifier in the second controller with an output from the second oscillator.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
76 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 19, wherein: an output from the comparator in the pulse width modulation section in the first controller is input to an AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the first controller; and an output from the comparator in the pulse width modulation section in the second controller is input to an AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the second controller.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
64 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 20, wherein: the AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the first controller has an input from the fault comparator section in the first controller; and the AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the second controller has an input from the fault comparator section in the second controller.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
90 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 21, wherein: an output of the AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the first controller controls the output from the pulse width modulator section in the first controller to the logic control section in the first controller; and an output of the AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the second controller controls the output from the pulse width modulator section in the second controller to the logic control section in the second controller.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
117 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 22, wherein the pulse width modulation line is connected between the output of the AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the first controller and the output of the AND gate in the pulse width modulation section in the second controller wherein the pulse width modulation line prevents a discontinuance of power to the first circuit by the first controller if there is no fault indicated by the first fault comparator section and wherein the pulse width modulation line prevents a discontinuance of power to the second circuit by the second controller if there is no fault indicated by the second fault comparator section.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
70 words
The first controller and at least a second controller of claim 15, wherein: the first controller further comprises a circuit to adjust the duty cycle when the at least a second controller is caused to discontinue supplying power to the load; and the at least a second controller further comprises a circuit to adjust the duty cycle when the first controller is caused to discontinue supplying power to the load.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4241345A
Cited
US4238796A
Cited
US4694388A
Cited
US4814965A
Cited
US4924170A
Cited
US4984241A
Cited
US5052028A
Cited
US5122726A
Cited
EP0503806A2
Cited
US5191519A
Cited
US5357417A
Cited
US5371764A
Cited
US5592126A
Cited
US5434770A
Cited
US5495233A
Cited
US5570397A
Cited
US5638264A
Cited
US5572554A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-09-14 | 2002-03-16 | 2002-09-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-09-14 | 2006-03-16 | 2006-09-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-09-14 | 2010-03-16 | 2010-09-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |