Patent US5708435A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5708435A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Multilayer wave absorber
Assignee: Mitsubishi Cable Industries Ltd
•
Filing: 1996-01-23
•
Granted: 1998-01-13
•
Expires: 2016-01-23
Abstract
Abstract A wave absorber comprising a sintered ferrite tile wave absorber as a base substrate lowermost relative to the incident wave, and one or more laminates comprising two layers as one set, with a dielectric layer as a lower layer and a dielectric loss-causing layer as an upper layer, laminated on the base substrate. The wave absorber of the present invention is thin, but is capable of absorbing waves over wide frequency bands of from tens of megahertz to a dozen or so gigahertz. By making the absorber thin, the absorber weighs less and is easy to handle, which in turn leads to fine workability and low construction cost.
Inventors
- 👤 Toshio Kudo
- 👤 Hideaki Tamura
- 👤 Kenichi Noda
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 15:27
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01Q; H01Q17/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
94 words
A wave absorber comprising a sintered ferrite tile wave absorber as a base substrate lowermost relative to the incident wave, and one or more laminates each comprising a dielectric layer and a dielectric loss-causing layer, wherein said dielectric layer is positioned between said sintered ferrite tile and said dielectric loss-causing layer, said dielectric loss-causing layer comprises a lower side and an upper side, said laminates are arranged such that an upper laminate is placed directly above a lower laminate, and said dielectric loss-causing layer in said upper laminate is an uppermost dielectric loss-causing layer.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
94 words
A wave absorber comprising a sintered ferrite tile wave absorber as a base substrate lowermost relative to the incident wave, and one or more laminates each comprising a dielectric layer and a dielectric loss-causing layer, wherein said dielectric layer is positioned between said sintered ferrite tile and said dielectric loss-causing layer, said dielectric loss-causing layer comprises a lower side and an upper side, said laminates are arranged such that an upper laminate is placed directly above a lower laminate, and said dielectric loss-causing layer in said upper laminate is an uppermost dielectric loss-causing layer.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
38 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, comprising two or more laminates, wherein the dielectric loss of the dielectric loss-causing layer of said upper laminate is not greater than that of the dielectric loss-causing layer of said lower laminate.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
The wave absorber of claim 2, wherein the thickness of the upper dielectric loss-causing layer is not less than that of the lower dielectric loss-causing layer.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the dielectric loss-causing layer is formed from a fiber assembly of fibers applied with a conductive coating on their surface.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the dielectric loss-causing layer is formed from a resin foam treated with a conductive material.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the dielectric layer is formed from a fiber assembly or a resin foam.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
15 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the dielectric layer substantially comprises only the air.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
38 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the uppermost dielectric loss-causing layer is formed in such a manner that it has stepwisely or consecutively increasing dielectric loss from the upper side to the lower side in said layer.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
106 words
The wave absorber of claim 7, comprising one laminate, wherein the dielectric layer has a complex permittivity of 1.0-1.1 in the real part and 0-0.1 in the imaginary part, the dielectric loss-causing layer has a dielectric loss increasing in two steps from the upper side to the lower side in said layer, the upper side having a complex permittivity of 1.2-1.45 in the real part and 0.15-0.25 in the imaginary part, and the lower side having a complex permittivity of 1.45-1.60 in the real part and 0.25-0.50 in the imaginary part, provided that the complex permittivity is measured with respect to a wave of 500 MHz.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The wave absorber of claim 8, comprising one laminate wherein the thickness of the dielectric layer in the laminating direction is not more than 50 mm.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
52 words
The wave absorber of claim 8, wherein the dielectric loss-causing layer is formed from a fiber assembly of the fibers applied with a conductive coating on their surface, and the uppermost dielectric loss-causing layer has an increased dielectric loss achieved by increasing the concentration of the conductivity-imparting agent in the conductive coating.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
16 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the base substrate comprises a lattice ferrite tile layer.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
36 words
The wave absorber of claim 1, wherein the base substrate comprises a laminate comprising a low dielectric layer, a sintered ferrite tile layer, a low dielectric layer and a rubber ferrite layer laminated in this order.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4023174A
Cited
GB879489A
Cited
US4012738A
Cited
US3887920A
Cited
US3938152A
Cited
US3720951A
Cited
US3754255A
Cited
US4003840A
Cited
US4118704A
Cited
US4752525A
Cited
EP0323826A1
Cited
US5296859A
Cited
US5446459A
Cited
US5394150A
Cited
US5453745A
Cited
EP1439337A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-07-14 | 2002-01-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-01-12 | 2005-07-14 | 2006-01-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-01-12 | 2009-07-14 | 2010-01-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |