US5692065A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and method for determining image quality
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1994-08-18
•
Granted: 1997-11-25
•
Expires: 2014-08-18
Abstract
Abstract Invented method, apparatus, and computer program product for determining image quality can be employed either during diagnostic mode or at run time of an imaging system. One component performs numerical analysis on a digital image. Another component accepts or rejects the quality of the digital image based on the results of the numerical analysis. In one embodiment, if the cumulative harmonic content of Fourier component amplitudes of a synthesized scan line exceeds a threshold value, the digital image is rejected as being of inadequate quality; otherwise the digital image is accepted. In another embodiment, a maximum gradient of a scan line of the digital image is computed. If, for some specified number of occurrences during a scan of a target, the maximum gradient exceeds a ceiling value or falls below a floor value, then the image is rejected.
Inventors
- 👤 Ravinder Prakash
- 👤 Michael J. Woolley
- 👤 Dale D. Decker
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 14:07
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0004; G06V; G06V10/00; G06V10/98; G06V10/993; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/10; G06T2207/10004; G06T2207/10008; G06T2207/20; G06T2207/20048; G06T2207/20056; G06T2207/30; G06T2207/30176
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
124 words
Method for determining performance of an image capture device collecting a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising the steps of: (a) performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; (b) rejecting the digital image when the maximum gradient is above a ceiling threshold value; and (c) accepting performance of the image capture device when an average of maximum gradient values over some period of time exceeds a predefined threshold.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
124 words
Method for determining performance of an image capture device collecting a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising the steps of: (a) performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; (b) rejecting the digital image when the maximum gradient is above a ceiling threshold value; and (c) accepting performance of the image capture device when an average of maximum gradient values over some period of time exceeds a predefined threshold.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
124 words
Apparatus for determining performance of an image capture device collecting a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising: (a) means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; (b) means for rejecting the digital image when the maximum gradient is above a ceiling threshold value; and (c) means for accepting image device performance when an average of maximum gradient values over some period of time exceeds a predefined threshold.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
124 words
Apparatus for determining performance of an image capture device collecting a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising: (a) means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; (b) means for rejecting the digital image when the maximum gradient is above a ceiling threshold value; and (c) means for accepting image device performance when an average of maximum gradient values over some period of time exceeds a predefined threshold.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
151 words
A computer program product having a computer readable medium having computer program logic recorded thereon for determining performance of an image capture device collecting a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, said computer program product comprising: computer readable program code means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; and computer readable program code means for rejecting the digital image when the maximum gradient is above a ceiling threshold value; and computer readable program code means for accepting device performance when an average of maximum gradient values over some period of time exceeds a predefined threshold.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
151 words
A computer program product having a computer readable medium having computer program logic recorded thereon for determining performance of an image capture device collecting a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, said computer program product comprising: computer readable program code means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; and computer readable program code means for rejecting the digital image when the maximum gradient is above a ceiling threshold value; and computer readable program code means for accepting device performance when an average of maximum gradient values over some period of time exceeds a predefined threshold.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
108 words
Method for determining image quality of a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising the steps of: performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; comparing the maximum gradient to a ceiling threshold value; and rejecting the digital image as representing an imaging system problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
108 words
Method for determining image quality of a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising the steps of: performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line; comparing the maximum gradient to a ceiling threshold value; and rejecting the digital image as representing an imaging system problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
32 words
Method of claim 4 wherein the step of rejecting the digital image further comprises rejecting the digital image as representing a PEL problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
37 words
Method of claim 4 further comprising the steps of: comparing the maximum gradient to a floor threshold value; and rejecting the digital image as representing a focusing problem when the maximum gradient is below the floor threshold.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
110 words
Apparatus for determining image quality of a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising: means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line and comparing the maximum gradient to a ceiling threshold value; and means for rejecting the digital image as representing an imaging system problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
110 words
Apparatus for determining image quality of a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, comprising: means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line and comparing the maximum gradient to a ceiling threshold value; and means for rejecting the digital image as representing an imaging system problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
34 words
Apparatus of claim 7 wherein the means for rejecting the digital image further comprises means for rejecting the digital image as representing a PEL problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
46 words
Apparatus of claim 7 further comprising: means for comparing the maximum gradient to a floor threshold value; and means for rejecting the digital image further comprises means for rejecting the digital image as representing a focusing problem when the maximum gradient is below the floor threshold.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
136 words
A computer program product having a computer readable medium having computer program logic recorded thereon for determining image quality of a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, said computer program product comprising: computer readable program code means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line and comparing the maximum gradient to a ceiling threshold value; and computer readable program code means for rejecting the digital image as representing an imaging system problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
136 words
A computer program product having a computer readable medium having computer program logic recorded thereon for determining image quality of a digital image, D, wherein D is represented as an L×W matrix of numbers representative of light intensity contained within cells denoted as D ij , where i=0 to L-1, j=0 to W-1, L is the number of matrix rows, and W is the number of matrix columns, said computer program product comprising: computer readable program code means for performing numerical analysis on the digital image with a computer by computing a maximum gradient of at least one scan line and comparing the maximum gradient to a ceiling threshold value; and computer readable program code means for rejecting the digital image as representing an imaging system problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
40 words
Computer program product of claim 10 wherein the means for rejecting the digital image further comprises computer readable program code means for rejecting the digital image as representing a PEL problem when the maximum gradient is above the ceiling threshold.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
48 words
Computer program product of claim 10 further comprising: computer readable program code means for comparing the maximum gradient to a floor threshold value; and computer readable program code means for rejecting the digital image as representing a focusing problem when the maximum gradient is below the floor threshold.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3981579A
Cited
US4379632A
Cited
US4467364A
Cited
US4427998A
Cited
US4519041A
Cited
US4523231A
Cited
US4660094A
Cited
US4649422A
Cited
US5255331A
Cited
US4710963A
Cited
US4647981A
Cited
US4724330A
Cited
US4941186A
Cited
US4757389A
Cited
US5048106A
Cited
US4888812A
Cited
US5126856A
Cited
US5025478A
Cited
US5124810A
Cited
US5144566A
Cited
US5384859A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-11-24 | 2001-05-26 | 2001-11-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-11-24 | 2005-05-26 | 2005-11-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-11-24 | 2009-05-26 | 2009-11-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |