US5384859A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for quality control of printed sheets
Assignee: Koenig and Bauer AG
•
Filing: 1992-08-10
•
Granted: 1995-01-24
•
Expires: 2012-08-10
Abstract
Abstract Individual printed image elements from an image to be inspected are allotted individual nominal ink density values, as by scanning an ideal printed sheet by a CCD matrix camera. The ideal values are stored in a main memory having segments for average, or grey, values for each image element. A multiplicity of proof images are scanned, and their density values measured and stored for each proof judged acceptable by an inspector. Thereafter, the variations in the acceptable proof density values are stored in the main memory as maximum and minimum acceptable deviations from the initial nominal values for each individual image element to provide a subjective tolerance value for the nominal density values in the main memory.
Inventors
- 👤 Claus A. Bolza-Schunemann
- 👤 Johannes G. Schaede
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 17:31
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0004; G06T7/0006; B; B41; B41F; B41F33/00; B41F33/0036; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/30; G06T2207/30108; G06T2207/30144; G06T2207/30176
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
102 words
A procedure for judging the quality of printed images printed on a printing carrier, by means of an opto-electronic exposure device and a reference information storing device for memorizing image information in high contrast image elements of a printed image, characterized in that a printed image is divided into a multitude of image elements of a size to be chosen, and that to each of these individual image elements is coordinated an individual, reference grey value within an envelope of image locations, and an individual, allowable reference ink density value variation to provide an allowable grey value tolerance in each image element.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
102 words
A procedure for judging the quality of printed images printed on a printing carrier, by means of an opto-electronic exposure device and a reference information storing device for memorizing image information in high contrast image elements of a printed image, characterized in that a printed image is divided into a multitude of image elements of a size to be chosen, and that to each of these individual image elements is coordinated an individual, reference grey value within an envelope of image locations, and an individual, allowable reference ink density value variation to provide an allowable grey value tolerance in each image element.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The procedure according to claim 1, characterized in that the allowable grey value tolerances of the image elements can be amended to provide subjective tolerance levels.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The procedure according to claim 1, characterized in that image elements of printed images which have grey values outside the allowable grey value tolerances are identified by error signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
38 words
The procedure according to claim 1, characterized in that printed images containing image elements having grey values outside the allowable grey value tolerances are provided with an identification mark for easily identifying the location of such image elements.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
28 words
The procedure according to claim 2, characterized in that image elements of printed images having grey values outside the allowable grey value tolerances are identified by error signals.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
38 words
The procedure according to claim 2, characterized in that printed images containing image elements having grey values outside the allowable grey value tolerances are provided with an identification mark for easily identifying the location of such image elements.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
117 words
A process for quality control of an image, comprising: defining within a printed image to be inspected a plurality of individual image elements, each element encompassing an image pattern; storing a master printed image incorporating said plurality of individual image elements, the stored master image including for each image element a stored nominal pattern value; storing an acceptable tolerance range for each image element nominal pattern value to provide minimum and maximum allowable pattern values for each said image element; measuring individual image elements of a printed image to obtain individual measured pattern values; and comparing said individual measured pattern values with corresponding allowable maximum and minimum stored pattern values to determine errors in said printed image.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
117 words
A process for quality control of an image, comprising: defining within a printed image to be inspected a plurality of individual image elements, each element encompassing an image pattern; storing a master printed image incorporating said plurality of individual image elements, the stored master image including for each image element a stored nominal pattern value; storing an acceptable tolerance range for each image element nominal pattern value to provide minimum and maximum allowable pattern values for each said image element; measuring individual image elements of a printed image to obtain individual measured pattern values; and comparing said individual measured pattern values with corresponding allowable maximum and minimum stored pattern values to determine errors in said printed image.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process of claim 7, wherein the step of storing a master printed image includes storing nominal ink density variations within each said image element.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process of claim 7, wherein the step of storing a master printed image includes storing an average density grey value for each said image element.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process of claim 7, wherein the step of storing a master printed image includes storing nominal image location values within each said image element.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process of claim 10, wherein the step of storing a tolerance range includes storing a range of acceptable image location values.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
34 words
The process of claim 11, further including determining a grey value for each said image element, said grey value indicating the presence of an image pattern within said range of acceptable image location values.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
23 words
The process of claim 11, wherein the step of storing a tolerance range further includes storing a range of acceptable ink density values.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
The process of claim 13, further including determining a grey value for each said image element, said grey value indicating an image pattern having an average ink density within said range allowable pattern values.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
34 words
The process of claim 14, wherein the step of determining a grey value for each said image element further indicates the presence of an image pattern within said range of acceptable image location values.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
63 words
The process of claim 7, wherein the step of storing an acceptable tolerance range includes: scanning a plurality of proof images to measure pattern values for each image element of each proof image; selecting proof images judged to have acceptable register and ink density in all its image elements; and storing measured pattern values for each image element of each selected proof image.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
53 words
A procedure for carrying out quality control of an image copy comprising: determining a nominal grey value representing ink density and image location within each of a plurality of image elements in an image; and determining from a plurality of acceptable proof copies an acceptable tolerance range for each said nominal grey value.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
53 words
A procedure for carrying out quality control of an image copy comprising: determining a nominal grey value representing ink density and image location within each of a plurality of image elements in an image; and determining from a plurality of acceptable proof copies an acceptable tolerance range for each said nominal grey value.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
25 words
The procedure of claim 17, further including determining from said plurality of acceptable proof copies maximum and minimum acceptable variations from said nominal grey value.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
EP0159880A2
Cited
EP0194331A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-01-23 | 1998-07-25 | 1999-01-24 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-01-23 | 2002-07-25 | 2003-01-24 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-01-23 | 2006-07-25 | 2007-01-24 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |