US4649422A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of and arrangement for determining the sharpness of originals for reproduction
Assignee: Agfa Gevaert AG
•
Filing: 1985-02-28
•
Granted: 1987-03-10
•
Expires: 2005-02-28
Abstract
Abstract An original to be reproduced is scanned line-by-line, and a scanning signal is generated for each linear, scanned region. The scanning signals represent the densities of the respective regions. A portion of each scanning signal is filtered to remove the higher frequencies. The filtered signal is differentiated to yield first density gradients, and the extreme positive and negative values of the first density gradients are determined for each region. Another portion of each scanning signal is differentiated without first removing the higher frequencies thereby yielding second density gradients. The extreme positive and negative values of the second density gradients are likewise determined for each region. A ratio of the extreme positive second density gradient to the extreme positive first density gradient is formed for each region, as is a ratio of the magnitude of the extreme negative second density gradient to the magnitude of the extreme negative first density gradient. A pair of sharpness values is then established for each region by subtracting 1 from the respective ratios. All of the sharpness values are now grouped according to the second density gradients or, alternatively, according to the second density gradients, as well as the density ranges of the respective scanned regions. The magnitudes of the sharpness values in each group are summed, and the sums compared with respective reference values. The original is classified as to its sharpness depending upon the results of the comparison so that a judgment may be made as to whether the original is worthwhile reproducing.
Inventors
- 👤 Wilfried Rauskolb
- 👤 Helmut Treiber
- 👤 Wilhelm Nitsch
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 15:28
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03D; G03D15/00; G03D15/001; G03B; G03B27/00; G03B27/72; G03B27/80
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim
147 words
A method of determining the sharpness of an original comprising the steps of: (a) scanning a series of linear regions of said original; (b) generating a scanning signal for each of said regions which is representative of the density of the respective region; (c) processing each of said scanning signals to yield a sharp signal and a fuzzy signal; (d) deriving a maximum density gradient from each of said sharp signals and each of said fuzzy signals; (e) establishing a series of first values from said maximum density gradients, the establishing step including calculating the ratio between the maximum density gradient of each sharp signal and the maximum density gradient of the corresponding fuzzy signal; and (f) classifying said original as to its degree of sharpness by comparing said first values with respective reference values which are a function of the density gradients of said sharp signals.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
147 words
A method of determining the sharpness of an original comprising the steps of: (a) scanning a series of linear regions of said original; (b) generating a scanning signal for each of said regions which is representative of the density of the respective region; (c) processing each of said scanning signals to yield a sharp signal and a fuzzy signal; (d) deriving a maximum density gradient from each of said sharp signals and each of said fuzzy signals; (e) establishing a series of first values from said maximum density gradients, the establishing step including calculating the ratio between the maximum density gradient of each sharp signal and the maximum density gradient of the corresponding fuzzy signal; and (f) classifying said original as to its degree of sharpness by comparing said first values with respective reference values which are a function of the density gradients of said sharp signals.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the scanning step is performed photoelectrically.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the processing step comprises dividing each scanning signal into a pair of signals, and filtering out the high frequency range of one signal of each pair to thereby obtain the respective fuzzy signal, the other signal of each pair constituting the respective sharp signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the deriving step comprises differentiating the respective sharp and fuzzy signals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said original is classified as sharp when at least one of said first values exceeds the respective reference value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the width of each of said regions is of the order of the smallest visually observable detail of said original.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1, said original having a transverse dimension; and wherein each of said regions traverses at least one-half of said dimension.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1, comprising the step of conveying said original along a predetermined direction during the scanning step, said regions extending transverse to said direction.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said original constitutes part of an elongated web of photosensitive material having a series of originals, and said regions extend transversely of said web.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the scanning step is performed using a stationary, linear array of sensing elements, and said regions substantially parallel said array.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method of claim 1, said maximum density gradients constituting extreme positive values of density gradient; and further comprising the step of deriving an extreme negative value of density gradient from each of said sharp signals and each of said fuzzy signals, the absolute magnitudes of said extreme negative values being employed in classifying said original as to its degree of sharpness.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 11, wherein the ratio between the absolute magnitude of the extreme negative value of each sharp signal and the absolute magnitude of the extreme negative value of the corresponding fuzzy signal is calculated.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the establishing step comprises grouping said ratios according to the density gradients of the respective sharp signals, and summing the ratios of each group, the classifying step being performed by comparing the sums with a reference curve representing sum of the ratios as a function of the density gradients of said sharp signals.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 13, comprising the step of storing a multiplicity of reference curves representing sum of the ratios as a function of the density gradients of said sharp signals, the respective curves being designed for use with originals having different density ranges, and the classifying step including selecting the reference curve corresponding to the density range of said original.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 13, wherein said reference curve is derived by performing the scanning, generating, processing, deriving and establishing steps for a multiplicity of visually fuzzy originals, and developing a curve which envelopes all sums of the ratios for said fuzzy originals, the curve obtained from the developing step constituting said reference curve.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
78 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the establishing step comprises grouping said ratios according to both the density gradients of the respective sharp signals and the density ranges of the respective regions, and summing the ratios of each group, the classifying step being performed by comparing the sums with a reference surface representing sum of the ratios as a function of both the density gradients of the respective sharp signals and the density ranges of the respective regions.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 16, wherein said reference surface is derived by performing the scanning, generating, processing, deriving and establishing steps for a multiplicity of visually fuzzy originals, and developing a surface which envelopes all sums of the ratios for said fuzzy originals, the surface obtained from the developing step constituting said reference surface.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
201 words
An arrangement for determining the sharpness of an original comprising: (a) scanning means for scanning linear regions of the original and generating scanning signals representative of the densities of the respective regions; and (b) evaluating means for evaluating the scanning signals so as to classify the original as to its degree of sharpness, said evaluating means including computer means, and a pair of channels establishing communication between said computer means and said scanning means, each of said channels comprising a differentiating circuit and a maximum/minimum detector, and one of said channels further including a low-pass filter, said one channel being arranged to deliver a first maximum density gradient to said computer means for each scanned region of the original, and the other of said channels being arranged to deliver a second maximum density gradient to said computer means for each scanned region of the original, said computer means being designed to establish first values by calculating ratios between respective first and second maximum density gradients, to compare the first values with respective reference values so as to classify the original as to its degree of sharpness, and to generate a classifying signal indicative of the degree of sharpness of the original.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
201 words
An arrangement for determining the sharpness of an original comprising: (a) scanning means for scanning linear regions of the original and generating scanning signals representative of the densities of the respective regions; and (b) evaluating means for evaluating the scanning signals so as to classify the original as to its degree of sharpness, said evaluating means including computer means, and a pair of channels establishing communication between said computer means and said scanning means, each of said channels comprising a differentiating circuit and a maximum/minimum detector, and one of said channels further including a low-pass filter, said one channel being arranged to deliver a first maximum density gradient to said computer means for each scanned region of the original, and the other of said channels being arranged to deliver a second maximum density gradient to said computer means for each scanned region of the original, said computer means being designed to establish first values by calculating ratios between respective first and second maximum density gradients, to compare the first values with respective reference values so as to classify the original as to its degree of sharpness, and to generate a classifying signal indicative of the degree of sharpness of the original.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
20 words
The arrangement of claim 18, wherein said scanning means comprises a charge-coupled device having a linear array of sensing elements.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
28 words
The arrangement of claim 19, comprising conveying means for advancing the original along a predetermined direction; and wherein said charge-coupled device is arranged transverse to said predetermined direction.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
15 words
The arrangement of claim 18, wherein said scanning means comprises a support for the original.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
15 words
The arrangement of claim 18, wherein each of said channels further comprises an analog/digital converter.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
24 words
The arrangement of claim 18, comprising an additional channel between said scanning means and said computer means, said additional channel including a maximum/minimum detector.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
14 words
The arrangement of claim 23, wherein said additional channel further comprises an analog/digital converter.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
16 words
The arrangement of claim 18, wherein said computer means comprises a memory for the reference values.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
12 words
The arrangement of claim 18, wherein said computer means comprises a microprocessor.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-03-09 | 1990-09-08 | 1991-03-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-03-09 | 1994-09-08 | 1995-03-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-03-09 | 1998-09-08 | 1999-03-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |