Patent US5553273A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5553273A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Vertex minimization in a smart optical proximity correction system

Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1995-04-17
•
Granted: 1996-09-03
•
Expires: 2015-04-17
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An optical proximity correction (OPC) routine that enhances the fidelity of VLSI pattern transfer operations such as photolithography and reactive ion etch (RIE) by predistorting the mask while biasing only critical features and eliminating, as much as possible, the creation of additional vertices. The OPC routine accomplishes corrections in a timely and cost effective manner on realistic data sets without causing unnecessary increase in data volume. The OPC method employs a series of shrink, expand and subtraction operations that separate complex computer aided design (CAD) data for a lithography mask or reticle into sets of basic rectangles. More particularly, the OPC method first identifies a plurality of gate regions in a CAD design. A plurality of design shapes in the CAD design are sorted according to geometric type. A plurality of sorted design shapes share at least one side with a second design shape. The sorted design shapes are then grouped according to width. Finally, all of the grouped design shapes having been identified as gate regions are biased based on applicable OPC rules.

Inventors

  • 👤 Lars W. Liebmann

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-29 20:50
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70425; G03F7/70433; G03F7/70441

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim 126 words
An optical proximity correction method for controlling accuracy in VLSI patterning operations, said method comprising the steps of: inputting an original design data set of a chip design; subjecting a level of the input design data set to a fracturing procedure including a series of shrink, expand and subtraction operations to fracture the design data set into a plurality of basic geometric shapes abutting at vertices existent in the original design dam set; sorting the plurality of basic geometric shapes by width; locating and identifying relevant fractions of the sorted plurality of basic geometric shapes which are critical regions to the original design data set; and applying optical proximity correction biasing all of fractions having been identified as critical regions to the original design dam set.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 126 words
An optical proximity correction method for controlling accuracy in VLSI patterning operations, said method comprising the steps of: inputting an original design data set of a chip design; subjecting a level of the input design data set to a fracturing procedure including a series of shrink, expand and subtraction operations to fracture the design data set into a plurality of basic geometric shapes abutting at vertices existent in the original design dam set; sorting the plurality of basic geometric shapes by width; locating and identifying relevant fractions of the sorted plurality of basic geometric shapes which are critical regions to the original design data set; and applying optical proximity correction biasing all of fractions having been identified as critical regions to the original design dam set.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 102 words
The optical proximity correction method recited in claim 1 wherein the step of subjecting the input design data set to a fracturing procedure comprises the iterative steps of: shrinking a first pattern by a predetermined amount equal to a minimum feature size in the level of the design; expanding the pattern resulting from shrinking said first pattern by the predetermined amount to obtain a second pattern; subtracting the second pattern from the first pattern to obtain a difference pattern; and repeating said shrinking, expanding and subtracting steps until a maximum feature size has been reached, thereby generating a plurality of difference patterns.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 45 words
The optical proximity correction method recited in claim 2 wherein the step of subjecting the input design data set to a fracturing procedure further comprises the step of combining the plurality of difference patterns to obtain a fractured design of the original design data set.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 38 words
The optical proximity correction method recited in claim 2 wherein the step of locating and identifying relevant fractions comprises the step of using Boolean operations to locate critical features based on intersections with previous or subsequent design levels.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 37 words
The optical proximity correction method recited in claim 2 wherein the step of locating and identifying relevant fractions comprises the step of identifying critical features by proximity to other features on the same or other design levels.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4426584A Cited
US4520269A Cited
US4812962A Cited
US4895780A Cited
US5182718A Cited
US5278421A Cited
US5208124A Cited
US5159201A Cited
US5432714A Cited
US5424154A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1999-09-03 2000-03-04 2000-09-03 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2003-09-03 2004-03-04 2004-09-03 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2007-09-03 2008-03-04 2008-09-03 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag