US5360509A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Low cost method of fabricating epitaxial semiconductor devices
Assignee: Arris Technology Inc
•
Filing: 1993-03-08
•
Granted: 1994-11-01
•
Expires: 2013-03-08
Abstract
Abstract Significant reductions in the cost of fabrication of epitaxial semiconductor devices without sacrifice of functional characteristics is achieved by eliminating the conventional but costly polishing procedure, instead subjecting the substrate to grinding, cleaning and etching processes in which the grinding removes material from the surface to a depth of at least 65 microns and the etching further removes material to a depth of about 6-10 microns, the grinding preferably being carried out in two steps, the first being a coarse step and the second being a fine step, with the rotated grinding elements dwelling at their respective last grinding positions for a short period of time. The result is the equivalent of the prior art polishing procedure which took considerably longer to carry out and which therefore was much more costly. Complementing this grinding procedure is an improved and cost effective epitaxial process utilizing a unique two-step hydrochloric gas high temperature etch and a faster growth rate process with shorter cycle steps. In addition, oxygen control and "gettering" capabilities result in a total process improving the economics of formation of epitaxial semiconductor devices.
Inventors
- 👤 Gregory Zakaluk
- 👤 Dennis Garbis
- 👤 Joseph Y. Chan
- 👤 John Latza
- 👤 Lawrence Laterza
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 20:04
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10P; H10P52/00; H10P14/00; H10P14/20; H10P14/24; H10P14/29; H10P14/2901; H10P14/2902; H10P14/2905; H10P14/34; H10P14/3402; H10P14/3404; H10P14/3411; H10P14/36; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S438/00; Y10S438/959
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim
85 words
The method of fabricating epitaxial semiconductor devices on a substrate which comprises: (1) subjecting the surface of said substrate on which epitaxial growth is to occur to a grinding process which removes material from said surface to a depth of at least 65 microns; (2) cleaning said surface without polishing it; (3) gas etching away said unpolished surface to a depth of about 6-10 microns; and (4) subjecting said surface to a chemical vapor deposition process, thereby to grow a doped layer on said surface.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
85 words
The method of fabricating epitaxial semiconductor devices on a substrate which comprises: (1) subjecting the surface of said substrate on which epitaxial growth is to occur to a grinding process which removes material from said surface to a depth of at least 65 microns; (2) cleaning said surface without polishing it; (3) gas etching away said unpolished surface to a depth of about 6-10 microns; and (4) subjecting said surface to a chemical vapor deposition process, thereby to grow a doped layer on said surface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1, in which in step 4 the chemical gas flow is supplied at a velocity of about 350-450 feet per second.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
30 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which the surface of said substrate opposite that on which said epitaxial growth occurs remains in its "as cut" condition.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
27 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which said substrate is silicon having an oxygen content of between about 25-40 parts per million absolute.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 4, in which the oxygen content of said substrate is about 30 parts per million absolute.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
52 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which said grinding process comprises a coarse grinding step in which the grinding element has a grit size of between about 40-60 microns followed by a fine grinding step in which said grinding element has a grit size of about 4-6 microns.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 6, in which said coarse grinding step removes material from said surface to a depth of at least about 50 microns, and in which said fine grinding step removes material therefrom to a depth of about 15-40 microns.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 6, in which the rate of material removal during said grinding process is less than about 1 micron per second.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process of claim 6, in which the rotational speed of the grinding elements used in said grinding process is about at least 4000-4300 rpm.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
65 words
The process of claim 6, in which, after the grinding element in each of said grinding steps has been advanced to remove the desired amount of material from said surface, the rotated grinding element is caused to dwell at its last grinding position for at least about 10-30 seconds after the coarse grinding step and at least about 10-20 seconds after the fine grinding step.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
65 words
The process of claim 7, in which, after the grinding element in each of said grinding steps has been advanced to remove the desired amount of material from said surface, the rotated grinding element is caused to dwell at its last grinding position for at least about 10-30 seconds after the coarse grinding step and at least about 10-20 seconds after the fine grinding step.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
65 words
The process of claim 8, in which, after the grinding element in each of said grinding steps has been advanced to remove the desired amount of material from said surface, the rotated grinding element is caused to dwell at its last grinding position for at least about 10-30 seconds after the coarse grinding step and at least about 10-20 seconds after the fine grinding step.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
65 words
The process of claim 9, in which, after the grinding element in each of said grinding steps has been advanced to remove the desired amount of material from said surface, the rotated grinding element is caused to dwell at its last grinding position for at least about 10-30 seconds after the coarse grinding step and at least about 10-20 seconds after the fine grinding step.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 6, in which, during said grinding process, cooling water is directed onto said surface at the rate of at least 4 gallons per minute.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
74 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which said cleaning process comprises ultrasonic cleaning with a high purity surfactant followed by the application of megasonic cleaning at 40°-60° C. of (a) a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and ammonium hydroxide in approximately equal parts with about 10 parts of water and thereafter (b) a combination of hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid in approximately equal parts together with about 10 parts of water.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
26 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which said etching step removes material from said surface to a depth of about 7 microns.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 6, in which said etching step removes material from said surface to a depth of about 7 microns.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
59 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which said etching step utilizes hydrochloric gas as the etchant, the hydrochloric acid being applied in two steps, the first step involving a hydrochloric acid concentration of about 90% and the second step involving a hydrochloric acid injection of about 40%, at an elevated temperature in a hydrogen atmosphere.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
231 words
The method of fabricating epitaxial semiconductor devices on a substrate which comprises: (1) subjecting the surface of said substrate on which epitaxial growth is to occur to a coarse grinding step in which the grinding element has a grit size of between about 40-60 microns which removes material from said surface to a depth of at least about 50 microns, followed by a fine grinding step in which said grinding element has a grit size of about 4-6 microns, said fine grinding step removing material to a depth of about 15-40 microns, the rate of material removed during said grinding process being less than about 1 micron per second and the rotational speed of the grinding elements used in said grinding process being about at least 4000-4300 rpm; (2) cleaning said surface without polishing it with a high purity surfactant followed by a chemical cleaning process comprising the application of a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and ammonium hydroxide in approximately equal parts with about 10 parts of water followed by a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid in approximately equal parts with about 10 parts of water; (3) etching said unpolished surface with hydrochloric gas at an elevated temperature in a hydrogen atmosphere to a depth of about 6-10 microns; and (4) subjecting said surface to a chemical vapor deposition process, thereby to grow a doped layer on said surface.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
231 words
The method of fabricating epitaxial semiconductor devices on a substrate which comprises: (1) subjecting the surface of said substrate on which epitaxial growth is to occur to a coarse grinding step in which the grinding element has a grit size of between about 40-60 microns which removes material from said surface to a depth of at least about 50 microns, followed by a fine grinding step in which said grinding element has a grit size of about 4-6 microns, said fine grinding step removing material to a depth of about 15-40 microns, the rate of material removed during said grinding process being less than about 1 micron per second and the rotational speed of the grinding elements used in said grinding process being about at least 4000-4300 rpm; (2) cleaning said surface without polishing it with a high purity surfactant followed by a chemical cleaning process comprising the application of a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and ammonium hydroxide in approximately equal parts with about 10 parts of water followed by a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid in approximately equal parts with about 10 parts of water; (3) etching said unpolished surface with hydrochloric gas at an elevated temperature in a hydrogen atmosphere to a depth of about 6-10 microns; and (4) subjecting said surface to a chemical vapor deposition process, thereby to grow a doped layer on said surface.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 19, in which the hydrochloric gas in said etching step is applied in two steps, the first step including a hydrochloric gas injection of about 90% and the second step involving a hydrochloric gas concentration of about 40%.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
31 words
The method of either of claims 19 or 20, in which, during the chemical vapor deposition process, the chemical vapor is supplied at a velocity of about 350-450 feet per second.
Claim 24
Independent Claim
68 words
The method of either of claims 19 or 20, in which, after the grinding element in each of the grinding steps has been advanced to remove the desired amount of material from said surface, the grinding element is caused to dwell in its last grinding position for at least about 10-30 seconds after the coarse grinding step and at least about 10-20 seconds after the fine grinding step.
Claim 25
Independent Claim
31 words
The method of either of claims 19 or 20, in which, during said grinding, cooling water is directed onto said surface at the rate of at least 4 gallons per minute.
Claim 26
Independent Claim
27 words
The method of either of claims 19 or 20, in which said substrate is silicon having an oxygen content of between about 25-40 parts per million absolute.
Claim 27
Independent Claim
30 words
The method of either of claims 19 or 20, in which the surface of said substrate opposite that on which said epitaxial growth occurs remains in its "as cut" condition.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4711256A
Cited
US5104828A
Cited
US5190064A
Cited
US5227339A
Cited
US5223080A
Cited
US5137597A
Cited
US5201958A
Cited
US5240883A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-10-31 | 1998-05-02 | 1998-11-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-10-31 | 2002-05-02 | 2002-11-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-10-31 | 2006-05-02 | 2006-11-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |