Patent US5220307A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5220307A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Warning system distinguishing wheel skidding and wheel slipping

Assignee: Zexel Gleason USA Inc
•
Filing: 1992-01-23
•
Granted: 1993-06-15
•
Expires: 2012-01-23
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A warning system alerts a driver of a motor vehicle to different types of traction losses. A first sensing circuit (10) detects a loss of wheel adhesion by monitoring a vehicle drive line for a pronounced vibration within a range of between ten and fifteen hertz. A second sensing circuit (12) monitors a brake light circuit to detect application of a vehicle brake. A logic circuit (28) combines outputs (A and B) from the first and second sensing circuits and outputs command signals (C and D) that distinguish between a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel skidding and a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel slipping. A warning device includes two indicators (36 and 38) that receive the respective command signals and produce sensorially distinguishable warning signals for eliciting different responses from the driver.

Inventors

  • 👤 Kenneth A. May
  • 👤 Steven E. Ostertag

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 22:47
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60T; B60T8/00; B60T8/32; B60T8/58; B60R; B60R16/00; B60R16/02; B60R16/023; B60R16/0237; B60W; B60W50/00; B60W50/08; B60W50/14

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 30
Claim 1
Independent Claim 159 words
A warning system for alerting a vehicle driver to different types of traction losses comprising: a first sensing circuit for detecting a loss of adhesion by a vehicle wheel with respect to a relatively moving traction surface; a second sensing circuit for detecting application of a vehicle brake; a logic circuit for combining sensor signals from said first and second sensing circuits and for producing a first command signal indicative of the detection of both the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel and the application of said vehicle brake and a second command signal indicative of the detection of the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel but not the application of the vehicle brake; a first indicator responsive to the first command signal of said logic circuit for alerting the vehicle driver to wheel skidding; and a second indicator responsive to the second command signal of said logic circuit for alerting the vehicle driver to wheel slipping.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 159 words
A warning system for alerting a vehicle driver to different types of traction losses comprising: a first sensing circuit for detecting a loss of adhesion by a vehicle wheel with respect to a relatively moving traction surface; a second sensing circuit for detecting application of a vehicle brake; a logic circuit for combining sensor signals from said first and second sensing circuits and for producing a first command signal indicative of the detection of both the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel and the application of said vehicle brake and a second command signal indicative of the detection of the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel but not the application of the vehicle brake; a first indicator responsive to the first command signal of said logic circuit for alerting the vehicle driver to wheel skidding; and a second indicator responsive to the second command signal of said logic circuit for alerting the vehicle driver to wheel slipping.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 29 words
The warning system of claim 1 in which said first and second indicators produce respective warning signals that are sensorially distinguishable for eliciting different responses from the vehicle driver.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 32 words
The warning system of claim 2 in which said respective warning signals are sensorially distinguishable by the driver without changing a driver's line of sight away from the relatively moving traction surface.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 14 words
The warning system of claim 3 in which said respective warning signals are audible.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 26 words
The warning system of claim 4 in which one of said warning signals produced by the first indicator is a sound suggestive of a skidding wheel.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 26 words
The warning system of claim 5 in which another of said warning signals produced by the second indicator is a sound suggestive of a slipping wheel.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 36 words
The warning system of claim 1 in which said first sensing circuit includes a sensor for detecting a pronounced vibration induced by said vehicle wheel having lost adhesion with respect to the relatively moving traction surface.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 24 words
The warning system of claim 7 in which the pronounced vibration detected by said sensor is induced by both wheel skidding and wheel slipping.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 25 words
The warning system of claim 8 in which said first sensing circuit includes a filter for isolating a range of frequencies of the pronounced vibration.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 51 words
The warning system of claim 9 in which said first sensing circuit also includes a level detector for measuring an amplitude of the isolated frequency range and a comparator for comparing the amplitude of the isolated frequency range with a threshold to detect said loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel.
Claim 12
Independent Claim 114 words
A system for warning a vehicle driver of both wheel skidding and wheel slipping comprising: a first sensing circuit for detecting a pronounced vibration induced by a vehicle wheel having lost adhesion with respect to a relatively moving traction surface; a second sensing circuit for detecting application of a vehicle brake; a logic circuit combining outputs of said first and second sensing circuits for distinguishing between a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel skidding and a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel slipping; and a warning device for producing sensorially distinguishable warning signals for eliciting different responses from the vehicle driver in response to the detection of wheel skidding and wheel slipping.
Claim 13
Independent Claim 114 words
A system for warning a vehicle driver of both wheel skidding and wheel slipping comprising: a first sensing circuit for detecting a pronounced vibration induced by a vehicle wheel having lost adhesion with respect to a relatively moving traction surface; a second sensing circuit for detecting application of a vehicle brake; a logic circuit combining outputs of said first and second sensing circuits for distinguishing between a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel skidding and a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel slipping; and a warning device for producing sensorially distinguishable warning signals for eliciting different responses from the vehicle driver in response to the detection of wheel skidding and wheel slipping.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 24 words
The system of claim 11 in which said first sensing circuit includes a sensor for monitoring a vehicle drive line for the pronounced vibration.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 24 words
The system of claim 12 in which said first sensing circuit includes a filter for isolating a range of frequencies of the pronounced vibration.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 49 words
The system of claim 13 in which said first sensing circuit includes a level detector for measuring an amplitude of the isolated frequency range and a comparator for comparing the amplitude of the isolated frequency range with a threshold to detect the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 30 words
The system of claim 11 in which said warning signals are sensorially distinguishable by the driver without changing a driver's line of sight away from the relatively moving traction surface.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 12 words
The system of claim 15 in which said warning signals are audible.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 35 words
The system of claim 16 in which one of said warning signals is a sound suggestive of a skidding wheel and the other of said warning signals is a sound suggestive of a slipping wheel.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 56 words
The system of claim 11 in which wheel skidding is distinguished by the detection of both the loss of adhesion by a vehicle wheel and the application of a vehicle brake and wheel slipping is distinguished by the detection of the loss of adhesion by a vehicle wheel but not the application of a vehicle brake.
Claim 21
Independent Claim 118 words
A method of alerting a vehicle driver to different types of traction losses comprising the steps of: sensing vehicle operating conditions with a first sensing circuit for detecting a loss of adhesion by a vehicle wheel with respect to a relatively moving traction surface; sensing vehicle operating conditions with a second sensing circuit for detecting application of a vehicle brake; combining outputs of said first and second sensing circuits in a logic circuit for distinguishing between a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel skidding and a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel slipping; and producing sensorially distinguishable warning signals for eliciting different responses from the vehicle driver to the detection of wheel skidding and wheel slipping.
Claim 22
Independent Claim 118 words
A method of alerting a vehicle driver to different types of traction losses comprising the steps of: sensing vehicle operating conditions with a first sensing circuit for detecting a loss of adhesion by a vehicle wheel with respect to a relatively moving traction surface; sensing vehicle operating conditions with a second sensing circuit for detecting application of a vehicle brake; combining outputs of said first and second sensing circuits in a logic circuit for distinguishing between a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel skidding and a loss of wheel adhesion due to wheel slipping; and producing sensorially distinguishable warning signals for eliciting different responses from the vehicle driver to the detection of wheel skidding and wheel slipping.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 60 words
The method of claim 19 in which said step of combining outputs includes distinguishing wheel skidding by the detection of both the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel and the application of said vehicle brake and distinguishing wheel slipping by the detection of the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel but not the application of said vehicle brake.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method of claim 20 in which said step of producing warning signals includes producing warning signals that are sensorially distinguishable by the driver without changing a driver's line of sight away from the relatively moving traction surface.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 21 in which said step of producing warning signals includes producing warning signals that are suggestive of wheel skidding and wheel slipping.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 43 words
The method of claim 22 in which said step of producing warning signals includes producing one of the warning signals as a sound suggestive of a skidding wheel and the other of the warning signals as a sound suggestive of a slipping wheel.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 19 in which said step of sensing vehicle operating conditions with said first sensing circuit includes monitoring a vehicle drive line for the pronounced vibration.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 24 in which said step of sensing vehicle operating conditions with said first sensing circuit includes isolating a range of frequencies of the pronounced vibration.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 50 words
The method of claim 25 in which said step of sensing vehicle operating conditions with said first sensing circuit includes measuring an amplitude of the isolated frequency range and comparing the amplitude of the isolated frequency range with a threshold to detect the loss of adhesion by said vehicle wheel.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 20 in which said step of sensing vehicle operating conditions with said second sensing circuit includes monitoring a vehicle brake light circuit.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1996-06-14 1996-12-14 1997-06-15 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2000-06-14 2000-12-14 2001-06-15 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2004-06-14 2004-12-14 2005-06-15 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag