Patent US5133019A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5133019A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Systems and methods for illuminating and evaluating surfaces
Assignee: IDENTIGRADE A PARTNERSHIP OF
•
Filing: 1990-02-01
•
Granted: 1992-07-21
•
Expires: 2010-02-01
Abstract
Abstract Systems and methods for illuminating an object surface with light at varying angles of incidence and for optically evaluating the object surface for features and defects, etc. are disclosed. In a specific implementation the systems and methods, the target object comprises a coin and the illumination and evaluation techniques are used to accurately objectively evaluate the numismatic quality of the coin and/or identify the coin. Central to the illumination and evaluation techniques is the ability to apply a uniform confined beam of light to the surface of the target object to be imaged. The confined angles of incidence of the beam of light includes a perpendicular component angle of incidence range and a parallel component angle of incidence range relative to the object surface. The component ranges are defined such a light beam illuminates the object surface from a well-defined direction. The direction and the extent of light beam illumination may be varied by redefining one or both of the component angle of incidence ranges. In addition to identifying features and defects of a coin surface, the illumination and evaluation techniques are capable of imaging the surface lustre of the coin.
Inventors
- 👤 Henry A. Merton
- 👤 James R. Diefenthal
- 👤 William D. Radigan
- 👤 Soumitra Sengupta
- 👤 Emmett J. Lenaz, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 04:35
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07D; G07D5/00; G07D5/005
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
230 words
A method for objectively optically evaluating the surface lustre of a metal object, said method comprising: (a) applying a beam of light to a surface of the object, said beam of light having angles of incidence relative to said surface, such that said angles of incidence include a perpendicular component angle of incidence range and a parallel component angle of incidence range relative to the object surface, said perpendicular and parallel component ranges being defined such that said light beam illuminates said object surface from a distinct direction relative to the object surface; (b) simultaneously optically imaging the light reflected from the surface of the target object; (c) redefining the parallel component range of the angles of light beam incidence relative to the object surface while maintaining the perpendicular component range of the angles of light beam incidence substantially constant such that the direction of light beam illumination relative to said object surface is rotated, and repeating step (b); (d) repeating step (c) until the direction of said light beam illumination has comprised approximately 360° about said surface; and (e) identifying areas of lustre on the object surface from the optical images produced in step (b) with rotation of the light beam illumination direction, said lustre areas comprising areas of varying light intensity on the object surface as the direction of light beam illumination is rotated about the object surface.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
230 words
A method for objectively optically evaluating the surface lustre of a metal object, said method comprising: (a) applying a beam of light to a surface of the object, said beam of light having angles of incidence relative to said surface, such that said angles of incidence include a perpendicular component angle of incidence range and a parallel component angle of incidence range relative to the object surface, said perpendicular and parallel component ranges being defined such that said light beam illuminates said object surface from a distinct direction relative to the object surface; (b) simultaneously optically imaging the light reflected from the surface of the target object; (c) redefining the parallel component range of the angles of light beam incidence relative to the object surface while maintaining the perpendicular component range of the angles of light beam incidence substantially constant such that the direction of light beam illumination relative to said object surface is rotated, and repeating step (b); (d) repeating step (c) until the direction of said light beam illumination has comprised approximately 360° about said surface; and (e) identifying areas of lustre on the object surface from the optical images produced in step (b) with rotation of the light beam illumination direction, said lustre areas comprising areas of varying light intensity on the object surface as the direction of light beam illumination is rotated about the object surface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 1, wherein said light beam applied in step (a) is uniformly applied to said object surface.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
56 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 2, wherein the object comprises a coin and said light measuring step (b) includes determining the intensity of each pixel of the coin image, and wherein said lustre area identifying step (e) includes comparing the intensity of corresponding pixels in successive coin images to identify said areas of varying intensity.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
36 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 3, further comprising the step of: (f) producing a lustre map of the surface of said object, said lustre map comprising a composite grey scale image of the object surface.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
47 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 4, wherein said lustre map producing step (e) includes determining the standard deviation in intensity of each pixel as said direction of light beam illumination is rotated about said surface, said standard deviation being proportional to the lustre of each pixel.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
110 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 5, wherein said standard deviation in pixel intensity is determined by: summing each pixel's intensity values produced as the direction of light beam illumination is rotated; producing a mean intensity value for each pixel by dividing said summed pixel intensities by the number of coin surface images produced, said number of coin surface images equaling the number of rotations of said direction of light beam illumination; and subtracting the mean intensity of each pixel from each pixel's corresponding intensity values produced as said direction of light beam illumination is rotated, and summing said differences to ascertain said standard deviation in intensity of said pixel.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
94 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 4, further comprising the steps of: generating a pair of grey scale images of the coin surface, said pair of images comprising an image of the lowest intensity of each pixel as said direction of light beam illumination is rotated and an image of the highest intensity of each pixel as said direction of light beam illumination is rotated; and subtracting the image of the lowest pixel intensities from the image of highest pixel intensities to produce a lustre map of the pixels of the coin surface image.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
29 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 2, wherein said object comprises a coin and said method further comprises the step of repeating steps (a)-(e) for the second coin surface.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
The lustre evaluating method of claim 4, further comprising the step of providing a grade of the lustre of each coin surface from said lustre map produced in said step (f).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
213 words
Method for objectively evaluating a surface of a target object for defects, said method comprising the steps of: (a) applying a substantially uniform beam of light to the surface of the target object, said beam of light having angles of incidence relative to said surface, said angles of incidence including a perpendicular component angle of incidence range and a parallel component angle of incidence range relative to the object surface, said perpendicular and parallel component ranges being defined such that said light beam illuminates said object surface from a distinct direction relative to the object surface; (b) optically imaging the target object surface simultaneous with step (a); (c) modifying the parallel component range of the angles of light beam incidence relative to the object surface while maintaining the perpendicular component range of the angles of light beam incidence substantially constant such that the direction of light beam illumination relative to the object surface is rotated, and repeating step (b); (d) repeating step (c) until said direction of light beam illumination has covered approximately 360° about said surface; and (e) automatically identifying areas of lustre interruption marks and areas of high angle impact marks on the object surface from the optical images produced in step (b) with rotation of the light beam illumination direction.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
213 words
Method for objectively evaluating a surface of a target object for defects, said method comprising the steps of: (a) applying a substantially uniform beam of light to the surface of the target object, said beam of light having angles of incidence relative to said surface, said angles of incidence including a perpendicular component angle of incidence range and a parallel component angle of incidence range relative to the object surface, said perpendicular and parallel component ranges being defined such that said light beam illuminates said object surface from a distinct direction relative to the object surface; (b) optically imaging the target object surface simultaneous with step (a); (c) modifying the parallel component range of the angles of light beam incidence relative to the object surface while maintaining the perpendicular component range of the angles of light beam incidence substantially constant such that the direction of light beam illumination relative to the object surface is rotated, and repeating step (b); (d) repeating step (c) until said direction of light beam illumination has covered approximately 360° about said surface; and (e) automatically identifying areas of lustre interruption marks and areas of high angle impact marks on the object surface from the optical images produced in step (b) with rotation of the light beam illumination direction.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
37 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 7, further comprising creating a grey scale high angle impact mark map from said areas of said object surface having varying intensity as the direction of light beam lumination is rotated.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
49 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 11, wherein said high angle impact mark map creating step includes applying a filter to the areas of said object images having varying intensities as the light beam illumination direction is rotated to remove large areas of varying intensities representative of surface lustre.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
40 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 11, further comprising creating a grey scale lustre interruption mark map from said areas of said object surface images having substantially no light reflection as the direction of the light beam illumination is rotated.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 13, wherein the target object comprises a coin and said method further comprises the step of optically mapping the raised contour features on the surface of the coin.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
96 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 14, wherein said step of creating a raised contour features map includes: applying a confined substantially uniform beam of light to the surface of the coin, said light beam having a substantially 360° parallel component angle of light beam incidence range and a low perpendicular component angle of light beam incidence range relative to said coin surface; and simultaneously optically imaging the light reflected from the coin surface to identify areas of bright light reflection, said areas of bright light reflection being representative of raised contour features of the coin.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
44 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 15, wherein said high angle impact mark mapping step includes subtracting the areas imaged in the coin features map from the areas imaged in step (b) having varying intensity as the direction of light beam illumination is rotated.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
48 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 15, wherein said lustre interruption mark mapping step includes subtracting the areas imaged in the coin features map from the areas imaged in step (b) having substantially no light reflection as the direction of light beam illumination is rotated about said object.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
21 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 15, further comprising the step of mapping the lustre of the surface of said coin.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
43 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 18, wherein said lustre mapping step includes automatically identifying from said step (b) large coin surface areas having varying intensities as the direction of light beam illumination is rotated, said large areas comprising areas of surface lustre.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
20 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 19, further comprising the step of automatically quantifying the surface lustre of said coin.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
34 words
The objective evaluating method of claim 18, wherein said high angle impact mark map, said lustre interruption mark map and said lustre map are used to produce a numismatic grade of said coin surface.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3349612A
Cited
US3728795A
Cited
US4058820A
Cited
US4191492A
Cited
US4223986A
Cited
US4134209A
Cited
US4225923A
Cited
US4241392A
Cited
US4288844A
Cited
US4403294A
Cited
US4309111A
Cited
US4392182A
Cited
US4583861A
Cited
US4480895A
Cited
US4541011A
Cited
US4494868A
Cited
US4493411A
Cited
US4529316A
Cited
US4513441A
Cited
US4682040A
Cited
US4750140A
Cited
US4617619A
Cited
US4706168A
Cited
US4811040A
Cited
US4899392A
Cited
US5018867A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-07-21 | 1996-01-20 | 1996-07-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-07-21 | 2000-01-20 | 2000-07-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-07-21 | 2004-01-20 | 2004-07-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |