US5023874A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Screening logic circuits for preferred states
Assignee: Texas Instruments Inc
•
Filing: 1989-02-23
•
Granted: 1991-06-11
•
Expires: 2009-02-23
Abstract
Abstract A test for screening integrated circuits with weak cells comprises storing a known pattern into the cells, interrupting the power to the cells, and comparing the data in the cells upon power-up with the data originally stored therein. The test may be repeated using the complement of the first pattern. Those devices which retain the stored pattern despite the power interruption may be classified as resistant to upset.
Inventors
- 👤 Theodore M. Houston
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 21:55
CPC Classifications
G; G11; G11C; G11C29/00; G11C29/04; G11C29/50; G11C29/50016; G11C11/00; G11C11/21; G11C11/34; G11C11/40; G11C11/41
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of testing a circuit having one or more memory cells, comprising the steps of: storing a logical state according to a selected pattern in each memory cell of said circuit under test; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; and comparing the logical state present in each cell with said stored logical state after power has been turned back on to said cells to determine if any of the cells have switched to another logical state.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of testing a circuit having one or more memory cells, comprising the steps of: storing a logical state according to a selected pattern in each memory cell of said circuit under test; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; and comparing the logical state present in each cell with said stored logical state after power has been turned back on to said cells to determine if any of the cells have switched to another logical state.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1 and further comprising the steps of repeating said storing, turning off the power, turning on the power, and comparing steps a predetermined number of times.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1 and further comprising the steps of storing, turning off the power, turning on the power, and comparing for a plurality of known time periods to categorize the storage device in different reliability classifications.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 1 and further comprising the step of repeating said steps of storing, turning off the power, turning on the power, and comparing for a plurality of voltage supply levels to the storage device to categorize the storage devices in different reliability classifications.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1 and further comprising the step of repeating said steps of storing, turning off the power, turning on the power, and comparing for a plurality of temperature levels to categorize the storage devices in different reliability classifications.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
12 words
A storage device tested for reliability by the process of claim 1.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
86 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: storing the complement of the logical state previously stored in each memory cell under test; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; and comparing the logical state present in each cell with said stored complement logical state after power has been turned back on to said cells to determine if any of the cells have switched to another logical state.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
90 words
The method of claim 1 and further comprising the steps of: storing selected logical states according to a different selected pattern in each memory cell of said circuitry under test; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; and comparing the logical state present in each cell with said different selected pattern after power has been turned back on to said cells to determine if any of the cells have switched to another logical state.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said selected time period is a benchmark time period and further comprising the steps of determining said benchmark time period.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
136 words
The method of claim 9 wherein said determining step comprises the steps of: storing a logical state according to a selected pattern and each memory cell of said benchmark memory device; turning off the power to each of said cells in said benchmark device; turning on the power to each of said cells in said benchmark device after a selected time period; comparing the logical state present in each cell of said benchmark device with said stored logical state after power has been turned back on to determine if any of the cells have switched to another logical state; and repeating said steps of storing, turning power off, turning power on, and comparing, until errors are detected for one or more of said cells said selected time period being increased for each repetition of said steps.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
161 words
A method of testing a storage device with one or more storage cells comprising the steps of: storing a logical state according to a selected pattern in each memory cell of said circuit under test; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; comparing the logical state present in each cell with said selected pattern after power has been turned back on to determine if any of the cells have switched to another state; storing the complement of the logical state in each memory cell from that previously stored; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; and comparing the logical state present in each cell with said stored complement logical state after power has been turned back on to determine if any of the cells have switched to another state.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
161 words
A method of testing a storage device with one or more storage cells comprising the steps of: storing a logical state according to a selected pattern in each memory cell of said circuit under test; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; comparing the logical state present in each cell with said selected pattern after power has been turned back on to determine if any of the cells have switched to another state; storing the complement of the logical state in each memory cell from that previously stored; turning off the power to each of the cells; turning on the power to each of the cells after a selected time period; and comparing the logical state present in each cell with said stored complement logical state after power has been turned back on to determine if any of the cells have switched to another state.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
12 words
A storage device tested for reliability by the process of claim 10.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3618030A
Cited
US3969618A
Cited
US4061908A
Cited
US4418403A
Cited
US4503538A
Cited
US4553225A
Cited
US4646307A
Cited
US4680762A
Cited
US4819237A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-06-10 | 1994-12-10 | 1995-06-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-06-10 | 1998-12-10 | 1999-06-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-06-10 | 2002-12-10 | 2003-06-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |