Patent US4890239A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4890239A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Lithographic process analysis and control system

Assignee: Shipley Co Inc
•
Filing: 1987-10-20
•
Granted: 1989-12-26
•
Expires: 2007-10-20
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A lithographic process analysis and control system which provides a modeled verison of a lithographic process in the dimensions of feature width, focus and exposure. This system uses the model to quickly determine the range of focus and exposure limits for obtaining the desired feature width. The system has flexible graphic display capability for displaying graphic representations of the data as measured and modeled.

Inventors

  • 👤 Christopher P. Ausschnitt
  • 👤 Edward A. McFadden
  • 👤 Raul V. Tan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 09:49
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/7055; G03F7/70558; G03F7/70605; G03F7/70616; G03F7/70641; G03F7/708

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim 78 words
A lithographic process analysis system comprising: memory means for storing feature width, exposure and focus data; means for receiving feature width, exposure and focus data and for supplying said data to said memory means; processor means for determining the best fit of said data on a critical dimension model to identify a best fit model; means for displaying said best fit model of said data on a three dimensional graph whose axes are feature width, exposure and focus.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 78 words
A lithographic process analysis system comprising: memory means for storing feature width, exposure and focus data; means for receiving feature width, exposure and focus data and for supplying said data to said memory means; processor means for determining the best fit of said data on a critical dimension model to identify a best fit model; means for displaying said best fit model of said data on a three dimensional graph whose axes are feature width, exposure and focus.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 18 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said critical dimension model comprises the following equation: ##EQU9##
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 19 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said processor means includes means for performing linear regression analysis.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 40 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said displaying means further includes means for displaying a three dimensional graph whose axes are measured feature width, measured exposure and measured focus alongside said graph of said best fit model.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 42 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim I wherein said displaying means further includes means for displaying a three dimensional graph of the measured data in feature width, focus and exposure overlaid on the three dimensional graph of the best fit model.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 27 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said processor means further includes means for determining a range of focus from a predetermined maximum exposure latitude.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 27 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said processor means further includes means for determining a range of focus from a predetermined minimum sidewall angle.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 33 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said displaying means further includes means for displaying a two dimensional graph in any of the two dimensions used in said three dimensional graph.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 27 words
The lithographic process analysis system of claim 1 wherein said displaying means further includes means for displaying a two dimensional graph overlaid on a three dimensional graph.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 105 words
A lithographic analysis and control system comprising: processor means for determining a largest available window in focus and exposure by best fitting experimental focus, exposure and feature width data into a critical dimension model, said model including an equation defining exposure latitude; means for receiving feature width measurements from the lithographic process being controlled; said processor means further including means for identifying a shift in exposure from said feature width measurements and said exposure latitude equation, and means, responsive to said identifying means, for generating a correction signal; and an interface for transmitting said correction signal to a tool to correct the shift in exposure.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 105 words
A lithographic analysis and control system comprising: processor means for determining a largest available window in focus and exposure by best fitting experimental focus, exposure and feature width data into a critical dimension model, said model including an equation defining exposure latitude; means for receiving feature width measurements from the lithographic process being controlled; said processor means further including means for identifying a shift in exposure from said feature width measurements and said exposure latitude equation, and means, responsive to said identifying means, for generating a correction signal; and an interface for transmitting said correction signal to a tool to correct the shift in exposure.
Claim 13
Independent Claim 113 words
A method for controlling a lithographic process comprising: determining an optimal exposure setting and a largest available window in focus and exposure by best fitting experimental focus, exposure and feature width data onto a critical dimension model, said model including an equation defining exposure latitude; receiving feature width measurements from the lithographic process being controlled; determining the minimum and maximum feature widths received over a period of time; determining maximum and minimum effective exposures from said minimum and maximum feature widths and said exposure latitude equation; providing a correction signal to a lithographic tool to correct for a shift in the midpoint between maximum and minimum exposure away from said optimal exposure setting.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 113 words
A method for controlling a lithographic process comprising: determining an optimal exposure setting and a largest available window in focus and exposure by best fitting experimental focus, exposure and feature width data onto a critical dimension model, said model including an equation defining exposure latitude; receiving feature width measurements from the lithographic process being controlled; determining the minimum and maximum feature widths received over a period of time; determining maximum and minimum effective exposures from said minimum and maximum feature widths and said exposure latitude equation; providing a correction signal to a lithographic tool to correct for a shift in the midpoint between maximum and minimum exposure away from said optimal exposure setting.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 115 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said step of determining an optimal exposure setting and a largest available window includes the steps of: measuring feature width as a function of focus and exposure; best fitting the measurements of feature width, focus and exposure to a critical dimension model which inherently provides an optimum focus; determining the value of optimal exposure in the critical dimension model when focus equals the optimum focus and feature width equals a predetermined desired width; determining a range of focus by setting exposure latitude at the optimal exposure to a selected maximum; determining a range of exposure by dividing a predetermined range of feature width by said selected maximum exposure latitude.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4393312A Cited
US4430571A Cited
US4698509A Cited
US4785189A Cited
US4694178A Cited
US4718019A Cited
US4777369A Cited
US4812661A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1992-12-25 1993-06-26 1993-12-26 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1996-12-25 1997-06-26 1997-12-26 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2000-12-25 2001-06-26 2001-12-26 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag