US4833914A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Pore pressure formation evaluation while drilling
Assignee: Anadrill Inc
•
Filing: 1988-04-29
•
Granted: 1989-05-30
•
Expires: 2008-04-29
Abstract
Abstract Formation strength and other measurement while drilling parameters are combined in a formation volumetric analysis which produces not only the traditional volumetric components of clay volume, mineral volume, total porosity, and water filled porosity, but also, in shaley formations, an excess or overpressure porosity. The overpressure porosity is then utilized to generate an indication of pore pressure which in turn is used in the drilling process as an aid in determining the lowest optimal drilling mud weight for most efficient drilling without incurring excessive risks of a blowout arising from an overpressured formation.
Inventors
- 👤 John Rasmus
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 17:56
CPC Classifications
E; E21; E21B; E21B21/00; E21B21/08; E21B47/00; E21B47/06; E21B49/00; E21B49/003
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
64 words
A method for investigating properties of subsurface formations traversed by a borehole, the method comprising the steps of: a. generating while drilling a plurality of signals indicative of formation properties derivable from measurements made while drilling; b. in response to said plurality of signals, generating a signal indicative of overpressure porosity; and c. in response to said overpressure porosity signal, optimizing the drilling process.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
64 words
A method for investigating properties of subsurface formations traversed by a borehole, the method comprising the steps of: a. generating while drilling a plurality of signals indicative of formation properties derivable from measurements made while drilling; b. in response to said plurality of signals, generating a signal indicative of overpressure porosity; and c. in response to said overpressure porosity signal, optimizing the drilling process.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of determining formation pore pressure from said overpressure porosity signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of determining optimum drilling mud weight from said overpressure porosity signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as recited in claim 1 wherein at least one of said derivable formation properties comprises a property representative of the mechanical process of drilling the borehole.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method as recited in claim 4 wherein said property representative of the mechanical process of drilling the borehole includes Formation Strength.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of deriving a volumetric analysis of the components of said formation including a clay volume, a non-clay mineral volume, and an effective porosity in addition to said overpressure porosity.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method as recited in claim 6 wherein said derivable properties include Formation Strength, the natural radioactivity of the formation and the resistivity of the formation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
73 words
The method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of determining a plurality of tool response equations which each relate a derivable formation property to a plurality of unknown formation properties selected from the group comprising: volume of wet clay, volume of a first mineral, volume of a second mineral, volume of effective porosity, volume of water in the effective porosity and volume of effective porosity attributable to overpressure in shales.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method as recited in claim 8 wherein one of said response equations comprises the following relationship: ##EQU7## where: FS meas =measured Formation Strength FS ma =Formation Strength of mineral of volume=1 V cl=clay volume V cl0 =clay volume when FS=0 φ ef =effective porosity φ ef0 =porosity where FS=0 φ op =volume of Phi ef due to the overpressure in shales φ op0 =volume of Phi ef where the FS=0.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method as recited in claim 5 wherein said Formation Strength is derived from measurements of downhole bit torque and downhole weight on bit.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as recited in claim 7 wherein said derivable properties further include properties selected from the group comprising neutron porosity, gamma density, sonic travel-time, and deep induction resistivity.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method as recited in claim 8 wherein one of said tool response equations includes a Formation Strength response equation which is a function of the difference between the formation pressure and the drilling fluid pressure at the location of the bit.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method as recited in claim 5 wherein Formation Strength is derived as a function of downhole weight on bit, rate of bit rotation, bit efficiency, gouging component of bit torque, rate of penetration and bit diameter.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method as recited in claim 12 in which the Formation Strength response equation is further a function of drilling mud weight.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of optimizing the drilling process includes the step of adjusting the weight of the drilling mud to produce a drilling mud hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the borehole being drilled which is maintained in accordance with formation pore pressures extant at the bottom of the borehole.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3517553A
Cited
US3620077A
Cited
US3785446A
Cited
US4064749A
Cited
US4187908A
Cited
US4338664A
Cited
US4685329A
Cited
US4627276A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-05-29 | 1992-11-28 | 1993-05-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-05-29 | 1996-11-28 | 1997-05-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-05-29 | 2000-11-28 | 2001-05-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |