US4187908A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for ascertaining optimum location for well stimulation and/or perforation
Assignee: Dresser Industries Inc
•
Filing: 1978-09-29
•
Granted: 1980-02-12
•
Expires: 1998-09-29
Abstract
Abstract A method is disclosed for the in situ examination of earth formations penetrated by a borehole to ascertain the optimum location along the length thereof for instituting well stimulation operations or, where the well is cased, the optimum location for perforating the casing. The method utilizes natural gamma ray logging to determine the optimum locations with the natural gamma ray radiation of the earth formation surrounding the borehole measured and the total measurement then separated into potassium-40, uranium, and thorium energy-band signals. A differential value is derived by subtracting the energy-band signal for either potassium or thorium from the energy-band signal for uranium, with the differential thereafter compared to a energy-level standard having a preselected magnitude. The optimum locations for perforating and/or instituting well stimulation operations will be those zones in which the differential exceeds the preselected energy level standard.
Inventors
- 👤 Walter H. Fertl
- 👤 Donald B. Vaello
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 16:37
CPC Classifications
E; E21; E21B; E21B43/00; E21B43/11; E21B43/119; E21B47/00; G; G01; G01V; G01V5/00; G01V5/04; G01V5/06
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim
212 words
A method for determining the optimum location along the length of a borehole penetrating an earth formation for instituting well stimulation operations, comprising the steps of: transversing the borehole penetrating the earth formation with a logging instrument having a gamma ray detector; detecting natural gamma radiation occurring in the earth formation in the vicinity of the borehole and generating signal functionally and depth-point related to the energy and frequency of occurrence of such gamma radiation; separating said signals into at least three energy regions corresponding to gamma radiation produced by naturally occurring radioactive isotopes of potassium, uranium and thorium occurring in said earth formations at said related depth-point. processing said separated signals for producing individual count signals each representative of radiation occurring in each of said at least three energy regions at said relative depth-point; combining the count signals representative of at least one of such energy regions corresponding to gamma radiation produced by radioactive isotopes of potassium and thorium with said remaining energy region count signals corresponding to gamma radiation produced by radioactive isotopes of uranium for deriving a differential signal; and comparing said differential with a preselected reference signal for determining optimum stimulation locations and at said depth-point location as indicated by said differential signal exceeding said preselected reference signal.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
212 words
A method for determining the optimum location along the length of a borehole penetrating an earth formation for instituting well stimulation operations, comprising the steps of: transversing the borehole penetrating the earth formation with a logging instrument having a gamma ray detector; detecting natural gamma radiation occurring in the earth formation in the vicinity of the borehole and generating signal functionally and depth-point related to the energy and frequency of occurrence of such gamma radiation; separating said signals into at least three energy regions corresponding to gamma radiation produced by naturally occurring radioactive isotopes of potassium, uranium and thorium occurring in said earth formations at said related depth-point. processing said separated signals for producing individual count signals each representative of radiation occurring in each of said at least three energy regions at said relative depth-point; combining the count signals representative of at least one of such energy regions corresponding to gamma radiation produced by radioactive isotopes of potassium and thorium with said remaining energy region count signals corresponding to gamma radiation produced by radioactive isotopes of uranium for deriving a differential signal; and comparing said differential with a preselected reference signal for determining optimum stimulation locations and at said depth-point location as indicated by said differential signal exceeding said preselected reference signal.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 1, including repeating the steps therein through said step of comparing said differential signal with said reference signal for a plurality of depth-point locations in the borehole and recording all optimum locations for performing well stimulation operations as a function of borehole depth.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1, further including the step of traversing a cased borehole and perforating the casing at said locations where said differential signal exceeds preselected magnitude of said arbitrary signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of deriving said differential signal, comparing said differential signal with said reference signal and displaying, as a function of depth, those areas wherein said differential signal exceeds said reference signal is performed in a digital computer.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
87 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step by developing said optimum location for performing well stimulation operations includes the steps of: generating a log tape displaying the count signals of the measurement of the radioactive isotopes of potassium, uranium and thorium as a function of depth; generating a reference cutoff value positioned at a preselected location along said log tape comparing said count signals with said reference line on said log tape; and deriving depth related locations for performing said well stimulation operations from said comparison.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2358574A
Cited
US2309835A
Cited
US2352433A
Cited
US2935021A
Cited
US3016961A
Cited
US3105149A
Cited
US3336476A
Cited
US3817328A
Cited
US3976878A
Cited
US3940610A
Cited
US4071755A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-02-11 | 1983-08-13 | 1984-02-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-02-11 | 1987-08-13 | 1988-02-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-02-11 | 1991-08-13 | 1992-02-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |