US4580219A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for reducing image artifacts due to projection measurement inconsistencies
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1983-05-02
•
Granted: 1986-04-01
•
Expires: 2003-05-02
Abstract
Abstract A method is provided for reducing streak artifacts in images reconstructed from projections having significant discrepancies between the first and last scan views due to subject motion or to scan geometry aberrations during a typical 360° scan such as that utilized in computerized tomography. The views taken at the beginning and end of the 360° scan are taken far apart in time, but in the image reconstruction process, they are treated as being adjacent. The method recognizes that in a 360° scan each ray in a projection is scanned twice so that the data set contains redundant information. To reduce the inconsistencies, weights less than the nominal weight are assigned to original projections at the beginning and end of the scan, and the views near the middle of the scan containing corresponding redundant data are compensated so that the combined weights of all ray pairs are constant. In this manner, the inconsistency between the first and last views is feathered out, and the resulting image exhibits significantly reduced sensitivity to errors caused by the discrepancies. The method is effective regardless of the modality (for example, ultrasound, emission nuclear tomography, computerized tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance) used to obtain the projection data.
Inventors
- 👤 Norbert J. Pelc
- 👤 Gary H. Glover
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 16:59
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T12/00; G06T12/10; A; A61; A61B; A61B6/00; A61B6/02; A61B6/03; A61B6/037; G06T2211/00; G06T2211/40; G06T2211/412; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S378/00; Y10S378/901
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 55
Claim 1
Independent Claim
218 words
A method of constructing images of an object slice which is useful with a plurality of modalities, said images being constructed from projection data measurements taken through the slice at a plurality of projection angles in the course of a scan of said object slice, said projection measurements being made up of individual ray measurements, said method being effective to reduce image artifacts due to inconsistencies in projection measurements in the beginning and end of said scan, wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) reducing the relative contribution of projection measurements in a first predetermined angular scan region extending over at least one of the beginning and end of said scan; (b) increasing the relative contribution of projection measurements in a second predetermined angular scan region near the middle of said scan, which measurements, in the absence of motion, contain similar information to that measured over said first predetermined angular scan region, said increase in relative contribution compensating for said reduced contribution assigned to projection measurements in step (a); and (c) constructing an image using said measurements in said first and second predetermined regions having modified contributions, and also using any remaining unmodified measurements which have not had their contributions reduced or increased, said image having reduced artifacts due to reduced contributions from said projection measurement inconsistencies.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
218 words
A method of constructing images of an object slice which is useful with a plurality of modalities, said images being constructed from projection data measurements taken through the slice at a plurality of projection angles in the course of a scan of said object slice, said projection measurements being made up of individual ray measurements, said method being effective to reduce image artifacts due to inconsistencies in projection measurements in the beginning and end of said scan, wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) reducing the relative contribution of projection measurements in a first predetermined angular scan region extending over at least one of the beginning and end of said scan; (b) increasing the relative contribution of projection measurements in a second predetermined angular scan region near the middle of said scan, which measurements, in the absence of motion, contain similar information to that measured over said first predetermined angular scan region, said increase in relative contribution compensating for said reduced contribution assigned to projection measurements in step (a); and (c) constructing an image using said measurements in said first and second predetermined regions having modified contributions, and also using any remaining unmodified measurements which have not had their contributions reduced or increased, said image having reduced artifacts due to reduced contributions from said projection measurement inconsistencies.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said first and second predetermined angular scan regions each comprise up to at least a 60° portion of said scan.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the respective sums of ray measurements in a projection having reduced contributions and the corresponding ray measurements in said second predetermined region containing measurement information similar thereto and having increased contributions are constant.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said ray measurements comprising said scan are organized into parallel-ray projections.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 4 where, in the course of a single scan of said object slice, projection measurements are taken over a scan region substantially greater than 180°, but not exceeding 360°.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of reducing comprises assigning weights to projection measurements, wherein said weights increase monotonically as a function of time over said first predetermined angular scan region in the beginning of said scan.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of reducing comprises assigning weights to projection measurements, wherein said weights decrease monotonically as a function of time over said first predetermined angular scan region at the end of said scan.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 6 or 7 wherein said relative contributions are selected to vary as cubic functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 6 or 7 wherein said relative contributions are selected to vary as linear functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 6 or 7 wherein said relative contributions are selected to vary as piecewise-constant functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the relative contributions of said ray measurements over said first predetermined angular region in a single projection are reduced by a constant amount, and wherein the relative contributions of corresponding ray measurements in a projection measured 180° away in said second predetermined angular scan region are each increased by a constant amount.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 11 wherein the sums of the relative contributions of the individual ray pair measurements in said first and second predetermined angular scan region which are situated 180° apart relative to one another are all equal to a constant.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said modality comprises transmission-computed tomography and wherein said step of constructing includes the step of preprocessing all of said projection measurements, said step of preprocessing further including at least one of the steps of gain calibration, reference normalization, logarithmic correction, and beam-hardening correction, said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions being applied following at least one of said steps of preprocessing.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 4 or 13 wherein said step of constructing includes the steps of filtering and then backprojecting said projection measurements including said projection measurements having reduced and increased contributions.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 14 wherein said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions follow said step of filtering and precede said step of backprojecting.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said ray measurements comprising said scan are organized into diverging fan-beam projections.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 16 where, in the course of a single scan of said object slice, projection measurements are taken over a scan region substantially greater than 180°, but not exceeding 360°.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 16 including at least one of the steps of reordering and rebinning so as to convert said projection measurements organized into divergent rays into projection measurements organized into parallel rays.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said step of reducing comprises assigning weights to said converted projection measurements, wherein said weights increase monotonically as a function of time over said first predetermined angular scan region in the beginning of said scan.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said step of reducing comprises assigning weights to said converted projection measurements, wherein said weights decrease monotonically as a function of time over said first predetermined angular scan region at the end of said scan.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 19 or 20 wherein said relative contributions are selected to vary as cubic functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 19 or 20 wherein said relative contributions are selected to vary as linear functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 19 or 20 wherein said relative contributions are selected to vary as piecewise-constant functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 18 wherein the relative contributions of said ray measurements over said first predetermined angular region in a single projection are reduced by a constant amount, and wherein the relative contributions of corresponding ray measurements in a projection measured 180° away in said second predetermined angular scan region are each increased by a constant amount.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 24 wherein the sums of the relative contributions of the individual reordered and rebinned ray pair measurements in said first and second predetermined angular scan region which are situated 180° apart relative to one another are all equal to a constant.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said modality comprises transmission-computed tomography and wherein said step of constructing includes the step of preprocessing all of said projection measurements, said step of preprocessing further including at least one of the steps of gain calibration, reference normalization, logarithmic correction, and beam-hardening correction, said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions being applied following at least one of said steps of preprocessing.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 18 or 26 wherein said step of constructing includes the steps of filtering and then backprojecting said projection measurements including said projection measurements having reduced and increased contributions.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 26 wherein said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions follow said step of filtering and precede said step of backprojecting.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of producing artificial fan-beam projection measurements to compensate for inconsistencies present in projection measurements in at least one of the beginning and end of said scan.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
77 words
The method of claim 29 wherein said step of producing artificial projections comprises the steps of producing a new set of fan-beam projection measurements for said first predetermined region using reflections of corresponding fan-beam projections situated in said second predetermined region; and combining said new fan-beam projections with existing fan-beam projections for said first predetermined region to produce a set of compensated fan-beam projections, which projections are then used to construct an image having reduced motion artifacts.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 30 wherein said first predetermined region is selected to be one of the beginning and the end of said scan.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 30 wherein said first predetermined region is selected to include projection measurements at the beginning and end of said scan, and wherein artificial projections are produced for each of beginning and end of said scan.
Claim 34
Independent Claim
42 words
The method of one of claims 30, 31, or 32 wherein in said step of combining said new fan-beam projections with said existing fan-beam projections the relative contributions of each are selected as monotonic functions of time over said first predetermined region.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 33 wherein the relative contributions of said new projections and said existing fan-beam projections are selected as cubic functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 33 wherein the relative contributions of said new projections and said existing fan-beam projections are selected as linear functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 33 wherein the relative contributions of said new projections and said existing fan-beam projections are selected as piecewise-constant functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 30 where in said step of combining said new fan-beam projections with said existing fan-beam projections the relative contributions thereof are selected such that the sum of respective pairs thereof is constant for ray measurements within each projection.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 30 where in said step of combining said new fan-beam projections with said existing fan-beam projections the relative contributions thereof are selected such that the sum of respective pairs thereof varies for ray measurement within each projection.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 29 wherein said modality comprises transmission-computed tomography and wherein said step of constructing includes the step of preprocessing all of said projection measurements, including said set of compensated projection measurements, said step of preprocessing further including at least one of gain calibration, reference normalization, logarithmic correction, and beam-hardening correction, said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions being applied following at least one of said steps of preprocessing.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 29 or 39 wherein said step of constructing includes the steps of filtering and then backprojecting said projection measurements including said projection measurements having reduced and increased contributions.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 40 wherein said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions follow said step of filtering and precede said step of backprojecting.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 40 wherein said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions follow said step of filtering and precede said step of backprojecting.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 16 wherein said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions, and constructing an image are performed without any of the steps of reordering, rebinning and reflecting said projection measurements.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 43 wherein said steps of reducing and increasing the relative contributions comprises weighting said projection measurements in said first and second predetermined regions with a weighting factor which is a function of the projection angle.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 44 wherein said weights are selected to be constant for divergent ray measurements within each projection within said first predetermined region.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 44 wherein said weights are selected to be variable for divergent ray measurements within each projection within said first predetermined region.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 44 wherein said weighting factors are selected to be lower in said first predetermined region, and higher in said second predetermined regions relative to one another.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 44 wherein said weighting factors are selected to increase monotonically as functions of time over said first predetermined region at the beginning of said scan.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 44 wherein said weighting factors are selected to decrease as monotonic functions of time over said first predetermined region at the end of said scan.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 48 or 49 wherein said weights are selected to be cubic functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 48 or 49 wherein said weights are selected to be linear functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 48 or 49 wherein said weights are selected to be piecewise-constant functions of projection angle over portions of said predetermined regions.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
66 words
The method of claim 43 wherein said modality comprises one of transmission-computed tomography and wherein said step of constructing includes the step of preprocessing all of said projection measurements, said step of preprocessing further including at least one of gain calibration, reference normalization, logarithmic correction, and beam-hardening correction, said steps of reducing and increasing relative contributions being applied following at least one of said preprocessing steps.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 43 or 53 wherein said step of constructing includes the steps of filtering and then backprojecting said projection measurements including said projection measurements having reduced and increased contributions.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3011057A
Cited
US4091416A
Cited
US4075492A
Cited
US4433380A
Cited
US4068306A
Cited
US4070707A
Cited
US4112303A
Cited
US4115695A
Cited
US4115696A
Cited
US4272820A
Cited
US4217641A
Cited
US4275444A
Cited
US4216381A
Cited
US4216381B1
Cited
US4280178A
Cited
US4418387A
Cited
US4272680A
Cited
US4482958A
Cited
US4463375A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-03-31 | 1989-09-30 | 1990-04-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-03-31 | 1993-09-30 | 1994-04-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-03-31 | 1997-09-30 | 1998-04-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |