US4510438A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Coincidence correction in particle analysis system
Assignee: Beckman Coulter Inc
•
Filing: 1982-02-16
•
Granted: 1985-04-09
•
Expires: 2002-02-16
Abstract
Abstract Flat beam optical sensing performed transverse of a flow aperture, of the particles passing through the aperture, directly indicates the presence of individual particles in the aperture. The indication can be used to eliminate or otherwise modulate the coincidence errors resulting in particle measurements taken through the length of the aperture.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert Auer
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 11:51
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N15/00; G01N15/10; G01N15/14; G01N15/1429; G01N15/1425; G01N15/1427; G01N15/1456; G01N15/1459
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 37
Claim 1
Independent Claim
209 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of a measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the apparatus comprising: A. measurement means producing said parametric datum in response to a measurement made through the lenth of said aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said measurement means being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture; B. detection means producing a detection signal in response to sensing the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, the detection means sensing the presence of individual particles other than through the length of said aperture; and C. correction means for modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
209 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of a measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the apparatus comprising: A. measurement means producing said parametric datum in response to a measurement made through the lenth of said aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said measurement means being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture; B. detection means producing a detection signal in response to sensing the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, the detection means sensing the presence of individual particles other than through the length of said aperture; and C. correction means for modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
215 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the system including measurement means producing a parametric datum of said parametric data in response to a measurement made through the length of an aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said measurement means being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of said measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the apparatus comprising: A. detection means producing a detection signal in response to sensing the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, the detection means sensing the presence of individual particles other than through the length of said aperture; and B. correction means for modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
215 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the system including measurement means producing a parametric datum of said parametric data in response to a measurement made through the length of an aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said measurement means being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of said measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the apparatus comprising: A. detection means producing a detection signal in response to sensing the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, the detection means sensing the presence of individual particles other than through the length of said aperture; and B. correction means for modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
44 words
The apparatus as claimed in claims 1 or 2 in which said particles pass through said aperture in a first direction axial of said aperture and said detection means include a beam of radiant energy passing through said aperture transverse to said first direction.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
33 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 3 in which said beam is flat and further is dimensioned so that all of said particles passing through said aperture must pass through said flat beam.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
51 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 4 in which said aperture has a certain width, said particles have at least about one diameter and said flat beam has a height in said first direction of about said at least about one diameter and a width equal to about said certain width.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
63 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 3 in which said detection means include optical sensor means receiving the radiant energy from said beam of radiant energy passing through said aperture, said optical sensor means for producing said detection signal in response to a change in the distribution of radiant energy so received effected by said particles passing through said beam of radiant energy.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
70 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 6 in which said particles passing through said beam effect a first order beam comprising radiant energy dispersed from said beam and a zero order beam comprising the remainder of the radiant energy of said beam, and said optical sensor means include a beam stop receiving substantially all of said zero order beam and a face receiving substantially all of said first order beam.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
26 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 6 in which said detection signal includes pulses produced in response to particles passing through said beam of radiant energy.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
42 words
The apparatus as claimed in claims 1 or 2 in which said correction means include gating means for gating each datum of said parametric data in response to said detection signal to pass a corrected parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
91 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 9 in which said detection signal includes pulses representing individual sensed particles, and said correction circuit means include sense and hold means for sensing and holding the value of each parametric datum, and counting means for counting the number of detection signal pulses occurring during each parametric datum, said gating means for gating each parametric datum from said sense and hold means in response to the number of detection signal pulses which are counted by said counting means during the production of that parametric datum.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
38 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 10 in which said gating means pass each parametric datum from said sense and hold means in response to one detection signal pulse being counted during the production of that parametric datum.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
211 words
A method for correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the system producing a parametric datum of said parametric data in response to a measurement made through the length of an aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said producing said parametric datum being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of said measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the apparatus comprising: A. detecting the presence of individual particles in said aperture other than through the length of said aperture, B. producing a detection signal in response to detecting the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, and C. modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
211 words
A method for correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the system producing a parametric datum of said parametric data in response to a measurement made through the length of an aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said producing said parametric datum being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of said measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the apparatus comprising: A. detecting the presence of individual particles in said aperture other than through the length of said aperture, B. producing a detection signal in response to detecting the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, and C. modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
206 words
A method of correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of a measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the method comprising: A. producing said parametric datum in response to a measurement made through the length of said aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said producing said parametric datum being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture; B. detecting the presence of individual particles in said aperture other than through the length of said aperture, C. producing a detection signal in response to detecting the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, and D. modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
206 words
A method of correcting coincidence error occurring in parametric data obtained from a particle analysis system producing parametric data from particles, the correction being effected substantially at the time that the coincidence error occurs in a parametric datum of said data, the parametric datum representing at least one particle analysis parameter and the error being introduced into the datum at the time of measurement and resulting from coincidence of at least two particles in the length of a measurement aperture as said particles pass through the aperture, the method comprising: A. producing said parametric datum in response to a measurement made through the length of said aperture as at least one particle passes through the length of the aperture, said producing said parametric datum being incapable of distinguishing between coincidence and non-coincidence of particles in the aperture; B. detecting the presence of individual particles in said aperture other than through the length of said aperture, C. producing a detection signal in response to detecting the presence of an individual particle in said aperture, and D. modulating said parametric datum in response to said detection signal after the production of said parametric datum and said detection signal to obtain corrected parametric data free of said coincidence error.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method as claimed in claim 12 or 13 in which said particles pass through said aperture in a first direction axial of said aperture and detecting said particles includes passing a beam of radiant energy through said aperture transverse to said first direction.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method as claimed in claim 14 in which passing a beam of radiant energy through said aperture includes dimensioning said beam to be flat and so that all of said particles passing through said aperture must pass through said beam.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method as claimed in claim 15 in which said aperture has a certain width, said particles have at least about one diameter and dimensioning said beam includes providing it with a height in said first direction of about said at least about one diameter and a width equal to about said certain width.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method as claimed in claim 14 in which detecting said particles includes optically sensing the radiant energy received from said beam of radiant energy passing through said aperture, said optically sensing includes producing said detection signal in response to a change in the distribution of radiant energy so received effected by said particles passing through said beam of radiant energy.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method as claimed in claim 17 in which said particles passing through said beam effects a first order beam comprising radiant energy dispersed from said beam and a zero order beam comprising the remainder of the radiant energy of said beam, and said optically sensing includes providing a beam stop receiving substantially all of said zero order beam and a face receiving substantially all of said first order beam.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as claimed in claim 17 in which producing said detection signal includes producing pulses in response to particles passing through said beam of radiant energy.
Claim 24
Independent Claim
37 words
The method as claimed in claims 12 or 13 in which modulating said parametric data includes gating each parametric datum in response to said detection signal to pass a correct parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method as claimed in claim 20 in which said detection signal includes pulses representing individual sensed particles, and said modulating said parametric data includes sensing and holding the value of each parametric datum, and counting the number of detection signal pulses occurring during the production of each parametric datum, said gating including gating each sensed and held parametric datum in response to the number of detection signal pulses which are counted during the production of that parametric datum.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
40 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 10 in which said gating means pass each parametric datum from said sense and hold means in response to said counting means counting one detection signal pulse during the production of that parametric datum.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
166 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from a particle analysis system, the errors being effected by coincidence of the particles in an aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the apparatus comprising: A. measurement means for producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of said aperture as particles pass therethrough, there being one parametric datum produced for at least one particle passing through said aperture; B. detection means producing a detection signal in response to the detection, other than through the length of said aperture, of the presence of individual particles in said aperture; and C. correction circuit means for modulating said parametric data in response to said detection signals, said correction circuit means including gating means for gating each datum of said parametric data in response to said detection signal to pass a corrected parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
166 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from a particle analysis system, the errors being effected by coincidence of the particles in an aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the apparatus comprising: A. measurement means for producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of said aperture as particles pass therethrough, there being one parametric datum produced for at least one particle passing through said aperture; B. detection means producing a detection signal in response to the detection, other than through the length of said aperture, of the presence of individual particles in said aperture; and C. correction circuit means for modulating said parametric data in response to said detection signals, said correction circuit means including gating means for gating each datum of said parametric data in response to said detection signal to pass a corrected parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
154 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from a measurement means of a particle analysis system, the measurement means producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of an aperture as the particles pass therethrough, the errors being effected by coincidence of particles in the aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the apparatus comprising: A. detection means producing a detection signal in response to the detection, other than through the length of said aperture, of the presence of individual particles in said aperture; and B. correction circuit means for modulating said parametric data in response to said detection signals, said correction circuit means including gating means for gating each datum of said parametric data in response to said detection signal to pass a corrected parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
154 words
Apparatus for correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from a measurement means of a particle analysis system, the measurement means producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of an aperture as the particles pass therethrough, the errors being effected by coincidence of particles in the aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the apparatus comprising: A. detection means producing a detection signal in response to the detection, other than through the length of said aperture, of the presence of individual particles in said aperture; and B. correction circuit means for modulating said parametric data in response to said detection signals, said correction circuit means including gating means for gating each datum of said parametric data in response to said detection signal to pass a corrected parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
143 words
A method of correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from measurement means of a particle analysis system, the measurement means producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of the aperture as the particles pass therethrough, the errors being effected by coincidence of the particles in the aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the method comprising: A. detecting, other than through the length of said aperture, the presence of individual particles in said aperture; B. producing a detection signal for each particle so detected; and C. modulating said parametric data in response to said the detection signals, said modulating including gating each parametric datum in response to said detection signal to pass a correct parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 32
Independent Claim
143 words
A method of correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from measurement means of a particle analysis system, the measurement means producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of the aperture as the particles pass therethrough, the errors being effected by coincidence of the particles in the aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the method comprising: A. detecting, other than through the length of said aperture, the presence of individual particles in said aperture; B. producing a detection signal for each particle so detected; and C. modulating said parametric data in response to said the detection signals, said modulating including gating each parametric datum in response to said detection signal to pass a correct parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 33
Independent Claim
151 words
A method of correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from a particle analysis system, the errors being effected by coincidence of the particles in an aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the method comprising: A. producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of said aperture as particles pass therethrough, there being one parametric datum produced for at least one particle passing through said aperture; B. detecting, other than through the length of said aperture, the presence of individual particles in said aperture; C. producing a detection signal for each particle so detected; and D. modulating said parametric data in response to said detection signals, said modulating including gating each parametric datum in response to said detection signal to pass a correct parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 34
Independent Claim
151 words
A method of correcting coincidence errors occurring in parametric data representing at least one particle analysis parameter of a plurality of particles, and obtained from a particle analysis system, the errors being effected by coincidence of the particles in an aperture as said particles pass through the length thereof, the method comprising: A. producing said parametric data in response to measurements taken through the length of said aperture as particles pass therethrough, there being one parametric datum produced for at least one particle passing through said aperture; B. detecting, other than through the length of said aperture, the presence of individual particles in said aperture; C. producing a detection signal for each particle so detected; and D. modulating said parametric data in response to said detection signals, said modulating including gating each parametric datum in response to said detection signal to pass a correct parametric datum free of said coincidence errors.
Claim 35
Independent Claim
93 words
The apparatus as claimed in claims 23 or 24 in which said detection signal includes pulses representing individual sensed particles, and said correction circuit means include sense and hold means for sensing and holding the value of each parametric datum, and counting means for counting the number of detection signal pulses occurring during each parametric datum, said gating means for gating each parametric datum from said sense and hold means in response to the number of detection signal pulses which are counted by said counting means during the production of that parametric datum.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
38 words
The apparatus as claimed in claim 27 in which said gating means pass each parametric datum from said sense and hold means in response to one detection signal pulse being counted during the production of that parametric datum.
Claim 37
Independent Claim
81 words
The method as claimed in claims 25 or 26 in which said detection signal includes pulses representing individual sensed particles, and said modulating said parametric data includes sensing and holding the value of each parametric datum, and counting the number of detection signal pulses occurring during the production of each parametric datum, said gating including gating each sensed and held parametric datum in response to the number of detection signal pulses which are counted during the production of that parametric datum.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2775159A
Cited
US3497690A
Cited
US3657537A
Cited
US3733548A
Cited
US3786261A
Cited
US3710933A
Cited
US3949198A
Cited
US3949197A
Cited
US3893766A
Cited
US3936741A
Cited
US3936739A
Cited
US3910702A
Cited
US3940691A
Cited
US3968429A
Cited
US3938038A
Cited
US3987391A
Cited
US4021117A
Cited
US4140395A
Cited
US4161690A
Cited
US4298836A
Cited
US4348107A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1988-04-08 | 1988-10-08 | 1989-04-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1992-04-08 | 1992-10-08 | 1993-04-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1996-04-08 | 1996-10-08 | 1997-04-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |