Patent US4296326A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4296326A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Watermark detection
Assignee: De la Rue International Ltd
•
Filing: 1980-03-05
•
Granted: 1981-10-20
•
Expires: 2000-03-05
Abstract
Abstract In a method of detecting sheets which do not have a genuine watermark (i.e. watermarks which result from variations in fibre distribution introduced during manufacture) the absorption of ultra-violet radiation is measured for each sheet in the area in which the watermark is expected to be present, and the transmittance of light by this area of the sheet is also measured. Sheets for which the absorption measurement does not show a substantially constant value, and sheets for which the light-transmittance shows a substantially constant value over the said area, are rejected. The absorption measurement is preferably effected by measuring the reflectance of ultra-violet radiation by the sheet, but the transmittance of ultra-violet radiation or the fluorescence of the sheet in the presence of ultra-violet radiation can also be measured. The measured value for the area can be compared with a reference value obtained by a measurement of the same parameter outside the watermark area.
Inventors
- 👤 John M. Haslop
- 👤 Reginald G. Knapman
- 👤 Michael A. West
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 09:13
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07D; G07D7/00; G07D7/003; G07D7/0034; G07D7/06; G07D7/12
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
104 words
A method of rejecting sheets which do not have a mould watermark (as herein defined), comprising the steps of: measuring for each sheet, in an area in which a watermark is expected to be present, the absorption of ultraviolet radiation by the sheet; measuring for each sheet, in the area in which a watermark is expected to be present, the transmittance of visible light by the sheet; and rejecting sheets for which the said absorption measurement does not show a substantially constant value and also sheets for which the said transmittance measurement shows a substantially constant transmittance of visible light over the said area.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
104 words
A method of rejecting sheets which do not have a mould watermark (as herein defined), comprising the steps of: measuring for each sheet, in an area in which a watermark is expected to be present, the absorption of ultraviolet radiation by the sheet; measuring for each sheet, in the area in which a watermark is expected to be present, the transmittance of visible light by the sheet; and rejecting sheets for which the said absorption measurement does not show a substantially constant value and also sheets for which the said transmittance measurement shows a substantially constant transmittance of visible light over the said area.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method in accordance with claim 1, in which the measurement of the absorption of ultra-violet radiation is effected by measuring the reflectance of ultra-violet radiation by the sheet.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method in accordance with claim 1, in which the measurement of ultra-violet absorption is effected by measuring the transmittance of ultra-violet radiation by the sheet.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method in accordance with claim 1, in which the measurement of ultra-violet absorption is effected by measuring the fluorescence of the sheet in the presence of ultra-violet radiation.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
54 words
A method in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising measuring the fluorescence of the sheet material in the presence of ultra-violet radiation outside the area in which the watermark is expected to be present, and rejecting the sheet if the said fluorescence measurement is greater than a predetermined value.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
35 words
A method in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 4, in which the measurement of the transmittance of visible light is effected by at least two detectors scanning the sheet along parallel lines.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
56 words
A method in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 4, in which for each sheet reference values for the absorption of ultra-violet radiation and for the transmittance of light are obtained by measuring these characteristics of a portion of the sheet other than the area in which the watermark is expected to be found.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method in accordance with claim 2, in which two measurements of ultra-violet reflectance are made, one from each side of the sheet.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method in accordance with claim 4, in which two measurements of the fluorescence of the sheet induced by ultra-violet radiation are made, one from each side of the sheet.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
155 words
Apparatus for examining sheets passing along a flow line and generating a reject signal in response to the passage of a sheet which does not have a mould watermark (as herein defined), comprising a source of ultra-violet radiation arranged to direct such radiation into the path of each sheet, means for measuring the absorption of the ultra-violet radiation of each sheet in an area of the sheet in which a watermark is expected to be present, means for comparing the measured absorption value with a reference value, means for measuring the transmittance of the said area of each sheet to visible light, means for comparing the light-transmittance value with a reference value, and means for rejecting sheets for which the said absorption measurement does not have a substantially constant relationship to the said reference value and also sheets for which the said light transmittance measurement has a substantially constant relationship to the transmittance reference value.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
155 words
Apparatus for examining sheets passing along a flow line and generating a reject signal in response to the passage of a sheet which does not have a mould watermark (as herein defined), comprising a source of ultra-violet radiation arranged to direct such radiation into the path of each sheet, means for measuring the absorption of the ultra-violet radiation of each sheet in an area of the sheet in which a watermark is expected to be present, means for comparing the measured absorption value with a reference value, means for measuring the transmittance of the said area of each sheet to visible light, means for comparing the light-transmittance value with a reference value, and means for rejecting sheets for which the said absorption measurement does not have a substantially constant relationship to the said reference value and also sheets for which the said light transmittance measurement has a substantially constant relationship to the transmittance reference value.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
30 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 10, in which the means for measuring the absorption of ultra-violet radiation comprises means for measuring the reflectance of the ultra-violet radiation by the sheet.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
29 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 10, in which the means for measuring the absorption of ultra-violet radiation comprises means for measuring the transmittance of ultra-violet radiation by the sheet.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
31 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 10, in which the means for measuring the absorption of ultra-violet radiation comprises means for measuring the fluorescence of the sheet induced by the ultra-violet radiation.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
68 words
Apparatus in accordance with any one of claims 10 to 13, further comprising means for measuring the fluorescence of the sheet material outside the area in which the watermark is expected to be present in response to the ultra-violet radiation and means for comparing this fluorescence value with a preset reference value, the rejecting means further rejecting sheets for which this fluorescence value exceeds a preset reference value.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
45 words
Apparatus in accordance with any one of claims 10 to 13, in which the rejecting means comprises a diverter in the said flow path downstream of the measuring means, the rejecting means acting to operate the diverter to sort rejected sheets from the remaining sheets.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
84 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 10, further comprising signal generating means for detecting the presence of a predetermined point of each sheet at a given point in the flow line, delay means for rendering the absorption and transmittance measuring means operative to respond to the said area of each sheet in which the watermark is expected to be present, and timing means for maintaining the said measuring means operative for a period determined by the expected length of the watermark in the scanning direction.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
49 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 16, further including delay means for rendering the absorption and transmittance measuring means operative to respond to an area of each sheet other than that in which the watermark is expected to be present, to obtain reference absorption and transmittance values for the sheet.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
26 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 11, comprising two means for measuring the reflectance of ultra-violet radiation by each sheet, one on each side of the sheet.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
27 words
Apparatus in accordance with claim 13, comprising two means for measuring the fluorescence of each sheet induced by ultra-violet radiation, one on each side of the sheet.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3774046A
Cited
US3842281A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-10-19 | 1985-04-20 | 1985-10-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-10-19 | 1989-04-20 | 1989-10-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-10-19 | 1993-04-20 | 1993-10-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |