Safety traffic controller

Claim 2

A vehicle traffic controller permitting traffic flow in a one-way direction while preventing traffic flow in an opposite wrong-way direction, and including: a support to be transversely installed on a pavement surface over which vehicular traffic is to pass and comprising, a pair of spaced rails secured to said pavement surface, there being an upwardly open channel between said secured rails; a slotted plate secured to and extending between the rails; a mounting shaft disposed transversely beneath said slotted plate; a plurality of barrier blades in a series along said mounting shaft and rotatively carried thereby, said barrier blades being normally retracted into the slots of the plate respectively; a plurality of levers and one for each barrier blade and rotatively carried along said mounting shaft, said levers being normally extended from the slots of the plate and rotatively depressible in both the one-way and wrong-way direction; spring means yieldingly urging the barrier blades and levers to their respective normal positions; and means responsive to wrong-way rotation of the levers to rotate the barrier blades therewith and upward from the slotted plate, when encountering a wrong-way vehicle tire to damage the same.

Claim 3

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 4

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 5

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are angularly displaced in their said normal positions respectively.

Claim 6

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are of substantially equal radius.

Claim 7

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are of substantially equal radius and angularly displaced in their said normal positions respectively.

Claim 8

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 9

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein the said point of each barrier blade is held angularly displaced from the blunted end of its complementary lever stopped by said spring means.

Claim 10

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein the said points of the barrier blades and blunted ends of the levers are held angularly displaced by said means responsive to wrong-way rotation when moving upward therewith.

Claim 11

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein the complementary barrier blades and levers are nominally of four inch radius from the center of rotation respectively and angularly displaced nominally 55° in their said normal positions and held thereat angularly displaced by said means responsive to wrong-way rotation.

Claim 12

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely acting springs, one yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 13

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely acting springs, one a substantially weak spring yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other a substantially strong spring yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 14

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of and yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of and yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 15

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 1, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one a substantially weak spring surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of and yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other a substantially strong spring surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of and yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 16

A below grade traffic controller permitting traffic flow in a one-way direction while preventing traffic flow in an opposite wrong-way direction, and including: a support to be installed on a pavement surface over a recess therein extending transversely thereof and over which vehicular traffic is to pass and comprising, a pair of spaced rails embracing said recess and secured to said pavement surface, there being an upwardly open channel defined by said rails and recess; a slotted plate secured to and extending between the rails; a mounting shaft disposed transversely beneath said slotted plate; a plurality of barrier blade and lever units integrally secured to individual sleeve members rotatively carried along said mounting shaft, said barrier blades being normally retracted into the slots of the plate respectively, and said levers being normally extended from the slots of the plates and rotatively depressible in both the one-way and wrong-way direction; and spring means yieldingly urging each blade and lever unit to said normal blade retraction and lever extention position; wrong-way rotation of the levers rotating the barrier blades upward therewith from the slotted plate, when encountering a wrong-way vehicle tire to damage the same.

Claim 17

A below grade traffic controller permitting traffic flow in a one-way direction while preventing traffic flow in an opposite wrong-way direction, and including: a support to be installed on a pavement surface over a recess therein extending transversely thereof and over which vehicular traffic is to pass and comprising, a pair of spaced rails embracing said recess and secured to said pavement surface, there being an upwardly open channel defined by said rails and recess; a slotted plate secured to and extending between the rails; a mounting shaft disposed transversely beneath said slotted plate; a plurality of barrier blade and lever units integrally secured to individual sleeve members rotatively carried along said mounting shaft, said barrier blades being normally retracted into the slots of the plate respectively, and said levers being normally extended from the slots of the plates and rotatively depressible in both the one-way and wrong-way direction; and spring means yieldingly urging each blade and lever unit to said normal blade retraction and lever extention position; wrong-way rotation of the levers rotating the barrier blades upward therewith from the slotted plate, when encountering a wrong-way vehicle tire to damage the same.

Claim 18

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 19

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 20

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are angularly displaced in their said normal positions respectively.

Claim 21

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are of substantially equal radius.

Claim 22

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are of substantially equal radius and angularly displaced in their said normal positions respectively.

Claim 23

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 24

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein the said points of the barrier blades are held angularly displaced from the blunted ends of their complementary levers by said sleeve members.

Claim 25

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein the said points of the barrier blades and blunted ends of the levers are held angularly displaced by said sleeve members respectively.

Claim 26

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the complementary barrier blades and levers are nominally of four inch radius from the center of rotation respectively and angularly displaced nominally 55° in their said normal positions and held thereat angularly displaced by said sleeve members respectively.

Claim 27

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely acting springs, one yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 28

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely acting springs, one a substantially weak spring yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other a substantially strong spring yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 29

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one surrounding the mounting shaft at one side of each blade and lever unit and yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other surrounding the mounting shaft at the other side of each blade and lever unit and yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 30

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one a substantially weak spring surrounding the mounting shaft at one side of each blade and lever unit and yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other a substantially strong spring surrounding the mounting shaft at the other side of each blade and lever unit and yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 31

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one with a hooked end engaged in a circumferential slot in the integral blade and lever and yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other with a normal end engaged in an opening in the integral blade and lever and yieldingly urging the blade to its normal position.

Claim 32

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 15, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one with a hooked end engaged and seated in opposition to one-way rotation in a circumferential slot in the integral blade and lever and yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other with a normal end engaged in an opening in the integral blade and lever in opposition to wrong-way rotation and yieldingly uring the blade to its normal position, the end of said other spring being circumferentially juxtaposed radially within the hooked end of the said one spring to lock the same in seated position in said slot.

Claim 33

An above grade traffic controller permitting traffic flow in a one-way direction while preventing traffic flow in an opposite wrong-way direction, and including: a low profile support to be transversely superimposed upon a pavement surface over which vehicular traffic is to pass and comprising, a pair of spaced rails secured to said pavement surface, there being an upwardly open channel between said secured rails; a slotted plate secured to and extending between the rails; a mounting shaft disposed transversely beneath said slotted plate; a plurality of complementary barrier blade and lever members secured to individually rotatable sleeves carried along said mounting shaft, said barrier blades being normally retracted into the slots of the plate respectively, and said levers being normally extended from the slots of the plates and rotatively depressible in both the one-way and wrong-way direction; spring means yieldingly urging the blade and lever members to said normal blade retraction and lever extention positions respectively; and coupling means responsive to wrong-way rotation of the levers to rotate the barrier blades therewith and upward from the slotted mounting plate, when encountering a wrong-way vehicle tire to damage the same.

Claim 34

An above grade traffic controller permitting traffic flow in a one-way direction while preventing traffic flow in an opposite wrong-way direction, and including: a low profile support to be transversely superimposed upon a pavement surface over which vehicular traffic is to pass and comprising, a pair of spaced rails secured to said pavement surface, there being an upwardly open channel between said secured rails; a slotted plate secured to and extending between the rails; a mounting shaft disposed transversely beneath said slotted plate; a plurality of complementary barrier blade and lever members secured to individually rotatable sleeves carried along said mounting shaft, said barrier blades being normally retracted into the slots of the plate respectively, and said levers being normally extended from the slots of the plates and rotatively depressible in both the one-way and wrong-way direction; spring means yieldingly urging the blade and lever members to said normal blade retraction and lever extention positions respectively; and coupling means responsive to wrong-way rotation of the levers to rotate the barrier blades therewith and upward from the slotted mounting plate, when encountering a wrong-way vehicle tire to damage the same.

Claim 35

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 36

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 37

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are angularly displaced in their said normal positions respectively.

Claim 38

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are of substantially equal radius.

Claim 39

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein complementary barrier blades and levers are of substantially equal radius and angularly displaced in their said normal positions respectively.

Claim 40

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates.

Claim 41

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein the said point of each barrier blade is held angularly displaced from the blunted end of its complementary lever stopped by said spring means.

Claim 42

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein each barrier blade has a point disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, wherein each lever has a blunted end disposed radially from said mounting shaft about which it rotates, and wherein the said points of the barrier blades and blunted ends of the levers are held angularly displaced by said means responsive to wrong-way rotation when moving upward therewith.

Claim 43

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein the complementary barrier blades and levers are nominally of four inch radius from the center of rotation respectively and angularly displaced nominally 55° in their said normal positions and held thereat angularly displaced by said means responsive to wrong-way rotation.

Claim 44

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely acting springs, one yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 45

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely acting springs, one a substantially weak spring yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other a substantially strong spring yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 46

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of the yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of and yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.

Claim 47

The traffic controller as set forth in claim 31, wherein the said spring means comprises two oppositely wound torsion springs, one a substantially weak spring surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of the yieldingly urging the lever to its normal position, and the other a substantially strong spring surrounding the mounting shaft at the side of and yieldingly urging the barrier blade to its normal position.